Alfa Romeo `65 Giulia TZ2 Bern - Market Street (3) by Xanthmann
Close
Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.
Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.
Description
Here is the rear of this beautiful race car. The beauty of this car does not translate to power though. Fully modified it still has far less than 300 horses. It's lack of performance on the track leaves one to ponder...why does the thing cost 10,000,000 credits? I still don't know what credits relate to as far as dollars or Euros. It boils down to beauty, age and rarity.
Another image from GT5 on the PS3. Thanks for the view and I pray you have a blessed day!
Comments (8)
stnaper
I liked all 3 posts of this ride-Great job!
Inspired_Art
Oye! Igotta get myself one of these game consoles.
Capoditutticapo
Drooling!!!
nitegrafix
Fantastic image!
claude19
wonderful and funny scene !!!
DennisReed
Stunning lines, but don't care for the Butt! ;)
Xanthmann
That would be the boot, lol.
hardwaretoad
A fine shot of what is known as a "Kamm" (Wiki or Google him) style rear end, it was designed to create downforce via negative air pressure, kind of like an airplane wing does only turned on it's side, so to speak ~ "form follows function". The rule of "supply and demand" applies to it's stratospheric costs not only in the real world but your game as well. I would think that would be a more than obvious reason. Horsepower doesn't necessarily relate to performance on track in all cases, the two are not mutually synonimous. Take Porsche's wonderful racers of the 50's and early 60's... the 356's, the Carerra's, the 550 Spyder's, all dominating cars in their respective classes in hillclimbs, etc. Probably not a one of them had much more than maybe 100 HP or so. One must take into account power-to-weight ratios for example. Effective transmission gearing to adequately utilize the motor's powerband, decent aerodynamics, etc. All fall into performance or lack there of. The RX7 you've posted pics and gif's of is a prime example of this in action. The 13B motor displaced 1.3 litres, hardly what one would call a massive displacement engine. Yet these cars did dominate their classes in IMSA for years on end... much to the chagrine of their competition.