cathedral three / switch by cbender

Photography • Architecture • posted on Jul 06, 2005

Open full image in new tab Zoom on image

Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.

Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.

Description

cathedral three / switch location: Regensburg, Germany well - due to some ideas and suggestions about my last posting cathedral three *lookingindirectionEgmont :D* i wanted to add this posting here - a kind of comparison of two shots i took from the same place simply went down a bit for the second shot... would be great to have your opinions which one works better... or further ideas about it... sorry - a big posting - but i guess it needs to be like that to really be able to compare - thanks a lot! the next in the serie of pics taken with my wide angle objective (17-35mm) all will be architecture shots - or details of buildings okay - i admit - sometimes there may be strange views... but well :)) i hope you enjoy :) the other shots: building T O W E R cathedral one cube one cathedral three cathedral three/switch house one cathedral four *** previous posting: yellow thanks for stopping by and watching :) and of course - critics, thoughts, whatever are welcome - the more useful the better... ;) so don't hesitate to point out things which could be done better... thank you! -christian picture taken with a Canon EOS 50e / 17-35mm Fuji 200 scanned negatives and postwork/framing in Xara X1/PSP9

Comments (16)

)

gunsan

5:16AM | Wed, 06 July 2005

If you ask me I think nr 2 works best for me. has a more exciting perspective!

)

Prinzessin

5:22AM | Wed, 06 July 2005

You know I do like both of them... :-) The right one seems to be a kind of stairway to heaven or something that way. Its easier to dip into this image, really to fall in there... The left one looks more architectural, more "standing", even I could say fixed... In the direct comparison its really amazing what a little change on POV can create... fascinating! I cannot say which one I like more ore most... they are too different in my eyes in this way. Different moods... And everyone will have his own opinion which one he/she likes more or most. I love it... uda :-) dzk fmad hugesthugs Excellent job!!! vote

)

statt2344

5:41AM | Wed, 06 July 2005

NUMBER TWO WORK'S FOR ME, THE ANGLE'S DRAW YOUR EYE UP THE PHOTO GIVING YOU THE IDEA IT IS A LARGE BUILDING. WHICH WE ALL KNOW CATHERADEL'S ARE LARGE BUILDING'S.

)

Tommy3D

8:52AM | Wed, 06 July 2005

I agree, Nunber two is my favorite...it is a much more open view...if that makes sense to you. However they are both beautiful Christian!!

lak

10:30AM | Wed, 06 July 2005

definitely the second pic looks better to me...everything looks sharper in it too~

camera2

10:51AM | Wed, 06 July 2005

Your putting me on the spot here Christian. Well I guess I deserve it after opening my big mouth. The second version is certainly more dramatic and brings into contrast the perspective of the building. We do lose the platform that I like in the first image as it shoots right at you at eye level. That is something that draws me to the first photograph. Both images are very different in the way they feel. On the second one, I like the fact that we see all the steps and the part where steps, cobblestone and the foundation all meet. That is what was missing in the first one. So which one would I choose over the other? The first image I felt needed the meeting of the steps, cobblestone and foundation which was cut off. The first one has something I like very, very much and that is you can see to surface of the platform that is level with the upper step. The second one has lost that very upper surface of the platform, but has gained the perspectives drama. Bottom line - the second one is stronger! Yet let me offer a challenge for you. Is it possible to get the upper surface as you have it in number 1, while also getting the perspective in 2? If your in the area again, let me know if I am crazy or just pushing the 'creative envelope' so to speak. Have a great day my friend and thank you for going the extra mile on tis one.

cynlee

3:39PM | Wed, 06 July 2005

without reading the other comments the 1st strikes me as being more solidly planted on the page while the 2nd is soaring off the top in a more dramatic way... now it would depend what you want... compositionally the 1st is classic, the 2nd is taking a chance & a bit unsettling... :]

)

Akinom

5:22PM | Wed, 06 July 2005

I still love the first one best! Cyn already explained it excellently. Thanks for the comparison, Christian! Wsch Dir einen angenehmen Tag morgen! hugz

logiloglu

5:49PM | Wed, 06 July 2005

ich wle von mir aus gesehn das linke Bild. es hat mehr Durchzeichnung in den Lichtern, das andere franst da schon etwas aus. die Serie geflt mir gut und ist wieder aurordendlich gut prentiert.excellent done,Christian. !!!!!!!!! #:O) !!!!!!!!!!

cureeeel

9:17PM | Wed, 06 July 2005

I think 2 works best for delivering the size of the subject. Fantastic shot!!

)