Sun, Nov 10, 4:29 PM CST

Renderosity Forums / Poser - OFFICIAL



Welcome to the Poser - OFFICIAL Forum

Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom

Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 10 4:26 pm)



Subject: HELP: Strange Firefly Render effect.


Tintifax ( ) posted Thu, 19 February 2004 at 4:21 PM · edited Sun, 10 November 2024 at 4:20 PM

file_99214.jpg

Made a hall, that renders fine in Poser4. But when I render in Firefly, I get these strange patterns on the wall. Settings are: Production Quality, Raytracing, Shadows, Polygons, Texture Filter. Pixel Sampling = 3, Filter = 1. I used 12 spotlights in this scene. This pattern does not come from the bump map. Could it be caused by the light settings, shadows or anything else. Input much appreciated! Thanks - Walter


OrcaDesignStudios ( ) posted Thu, 19 February 2004 at 4:45 PM

Attached Link: http://www.keindesign.de/stefan/poser/firefaq.html

Have you checked to make sure there were no "stray nodes" with things plugged in? I don't know how this kind of thing would happen in rendering if there isn't a node causing it, but you might be able to find an answer at the website attached. Unless this is an extension of the "smooth polygons" glitch...? Try rendering without the "smooth polygons" option checked and see what happens.


Mason ( ) posted Thu, 19 February 2004 at 5:53 PM

Have you tried setting smooth shading off for the geometry. This could be a smooth shading issue.


ynsaen ( ) posted Thu, 19 February 2004 at 8:06 PM

It's definitely a geometry issue of some sort, though it could be caused by smoothing, displacement, bump, or texture filtering. Can you post a wireframe of ONLY on of the affected areas, or perhaps a chunk of the areas in a new, close up render? I'd like to see the specifics of it. in general, that ballooning would be caused by smooth polygons, but shutting them off for the whole scen may not be necessary -- select that object, go to the properties tab of the dials thingy, and uncheck smoothing for that item to check. hth, ynsaen

thou and I, my friend, can, in the most flunkey world, make, each of us, one non-flunkey, one hero, if we like: that will be two heroes to begin with. (Carlyle)


biggert ( ) posted Thu, 19 February 2004 at 9:04 PM

first....very nice render...well minus the defect...but great render anyway...nice effects with light, texture, and displacement.... about the defects....i get a similar trouble with single sided plane primitives (especially the vertical plane) with spotlights....the problem is when i point a spotlight at a vertical plane primitive i end up with grey and black checkerboard patterns....turning off the smoothing doesnt help...the solution i discovered was to replace the plane with a resized square primitive....the checkerboard patterns disappear if i use anything other than a plane primitive...this pattern shows up on a plane whether textured or not as long as a spotlight is used.....i wonder why.... i thinks its probably what ynsaen said about the geometry.... anyway.....i thought id mention it.....its kinda like your problem.... i guess if its possible you could replace the affected areas in your scene with a resized square primitive? or export a poser square primitive and incorporate it in your original mesh... if all else fails you can always use photoshop to cover the defects....


visque ( ) posted Thu, 19 February 2004 at 9:28 PM

If I remember correctly there was a simular glitch that was a result of the texture filtering being on. Just a thought


Tintifax ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 1:18 AM

Thanks for the discussion. It's definitely not a stray node problem. I checked that. The geometry is a simple tiled plane made in C4D. It doesn't show any problems with Poser4 or Poser5 in other places. I didn't check the smooth polygon or texture filter thing yet. Have to try it. Looking at it only areas lighted by certain spotlights are affected. I also have to play with theses lights to see if this changes something. Thanks for your input, any other idea? - Walter


ynsaen ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 1:23 AM

Without further data, kinda hard -- you say a tiled plane, which makes me further wonder about the mesh, again. But then you also note it's a certain spotlight, so... lol

thou and I, my friend, can, in the most flunkey world, make, each of us, one non-flunkey, one hero, if we like: that will be two heroes to begin with. (Carlyle)


Tintifax ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 1:46 AM

file_99215.jpg

Hi ynsaen,

Here is the mesh of this wall tile (taken from UV Mapper). Can't show you more deatils at the moment, because I'm not at home, but my Poser5 is ;-). Will come up with more information later.

Thanks

  • Walter


diolma ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 5:39 AM

I've had similar problems with this effect in FireFly. I've found that it can sometimes be cured by adding a tiny amount of displacement to the affected parts. cheers, Diolma



ynsaen ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 10:16 AM

Diolma has it dead on, Walter. Firefly does not render single sided planes very well in certain circumstances, and also does not handle places where two flat planes slightly overlap as well. Maya had the same issue with a couple of rendering engines it was using a generation back or so. The secret is to take a math node, set it to Subtract, change the first value to 0.05, and plug it into the displacement channel, which is then set at something like 0.01 or so. This will usually make the issue go away. Hope this helps :)

thou and I, my friend, can, in the most flunkey world, make, each of us, one non-flunkey, one hero, if we like: that will be two heroes to begin with. (Carlyle)


Tintifax ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 1:31 PM

file_99216.jpg

I made a render from another position in the hall to better see what's happening. I switched on/off all options of the firefly render and found out that it only happens, when I turn the shadowmaps on. This render is done with quality 256 set on all spots.


Tintifax ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 1:33 PM

file_99217.jpg

This was rendered with setting the quality of all spots to 1024.


Tintifax ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 1:36 PM

file_99218.jpg

In the 3rd render I turned the shadowmaps off on all spots and I used raytraced shadows. The pattern is gone, instead I get some ugly black spots. By the way, setting a displacement according to ynsaen didn't help. No change was visible. Any further idea?


stewer ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 1:44 PM

Attached Link: http://www.keindesign.de/stefan/poser/firefaq.html#2

Try increasing the shadow map bias.


Tintifax ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 2:03 PM

Were can I do that? I have a German Poser Version.


stewer ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 2:22 PM

Hm...hab gerade leider keinen Deutschen Poser 5 zur Hand :-/ Wenn du in der Parameterpalette auf die Seite gehst wo du zwischen ray tracing und shadow maps wechseln kannst, gibt es dort zwei Raedchen. Eines davon zeigt Ganzzahlen an (damit wird die Weichheit des Schattens eingestellt) und eine mit 'ner Kommazahl, der Standard ist wenn ich mich recht erinnere die 0.8. Das ist der "shadow bias" Parameter, wenn du den hoeher stellst (versuch mal 1.5) sollten die Muster verschwinden.


Tintifax ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 3:10 PM

Aha, also 'Min. Schattenverzerrung'. Warum mues deutsche Softwareversionen geben? Herzlichen Dank, ich werde es gleich versuchen. - Walter


Tintifax ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 3:28 PM

Leider Nein. Bei Shadowmaps hilft es leider nicht. Ich habe noch immer das selbe Muster.


stewer ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 3:43 PM

You don't have atmospherics enabled by any chance, do you? Try really large values for the shadow bias, like 5 or 10. What could also work would be increasing the shadow blur - that other dial. And if you haven't done so yet, read Dr. Geeps tutorial about adjusting the shadow lite cams, that can also vastly improve the shadows. (wieder in Englisch damit die stumm mitlesenden auch was davon haben.)


Tintifax ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 3:45 PM

file_99219.jpg

Habe die Weichheit des Schattens auf 5 gestellt. Pattern ist jetzt schwher, aber immer noch da. Bias hatte keinen Effekt.


Tintifax ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 3:48 PM

OK, cross-posting. I try it with the high bias values. I have no atmospherics enabled.


Tintifax ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 4:09 PM

file_99220.jpg

Setting the Bias to 10 improves, but does not solve the problem. I'll try the Geep tutorials. What makes me a bit suspicious is, that only one of my lights seem to generate this effect. I have to check that too.


ynsaen ( ) posted Fri, 20 February 2004 at 5:42 PM

dang. I'm going to follow this thread a bit. I'm very interested in knowing what does that. And, since I was rude and forgot to say so before -- that is one awesome set!

thou and I, my friend, can, in the most flunkey world, make, each of us, one non-flunkey, one hero, if we like: that will be two heroes to begin with. (Carlyle)


Tintifax ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 2:28 AM

file_99221.jpg

I slept a bit and did the next render. It really seems that a single spot is causing all the troubles. The now famous spot number 9. I changed the end angle of the spot and guess what. The pattern changed.


Tintifax ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 2:29 AM

Forgot to say, changed it from 160 to 70. Thanks ynsaen for your kind words.


ynsaen ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 2:50 AM

Very, very interesting... Any chance you could send me the light set? I'd like to look at it.

thou and I, my friend, can, in the most flunkey world, make, each of us, one non-flunkey, one hero, if we like: that will be two heroes to begin with. (Carlyle)


stewer ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 3:38 AM

Is it the spot at a weird angle to the walls? What happens if you disable "cast shadows" on the walls with the weird patterns?


Tintifax ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 5:47 AM

Hi stewer, I think I'm gettin to the point. The spot is showing up (y-direction) and is thus placed in a 90 angle to this wall. It is meant to light a completely different part of the hall. It is more than 10 poser units away from the wall (x-direction). So this is just stray light. The pattern definitely comes from the shadow map and no displacement helps. Other spots show the same behavior, but not as obvious as this one. You have to look very close to see it. It also seems that moving this light closer to this wall the pattern gets smaller. I have to verify that. At the moment I assume that there is a bug in rendering the shadow maps. To get this effect you have to place a spot quite a distance away from a wall in an angle to the wall about 90 and a wide light angle (near 160) to get the "best" effect. I will give 'disabling "cast shadows" a try.


Tintifax ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 6:41 AM

file_99222.jpg

Ok, I disabled "cast shadow" on one wall tile (yeah, it was the left one in the back) and the pattern disappeared. Does this mean there is no shadow map calculated on this wall? What does this tell you?


Tintifax ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 6:45 AM

ynsaen, sure I can send you the lightset. Just let me know where I can send it (via IM)


stewer ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 6:45 AM

Looks to me like it's a self-shadowing effect. That's no bug in the shadow map implementation but a problem that any renderer using z-depth shadow maps has.


Tintifax ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 8:19 AM

Any known solution or workaround? I would like to know why this only happens in some places and why only the walls are affected.


Tintifax ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 8:20 AM

How does this z-depth shadow work? Is there an explanation somewhere?


Tintifax ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 8:24 AM

By the way, there is no such problem with Poser4.


Tintifax ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 9:35 AM

file_99223.jpg

Ok, seems that switching "cast shadow" off helps. Switched it off on all wall tiles and the result is excellent. As you may notice, I have to switch it off on the floor tiles as well. Seems to happen only on planes. Thanks for your help stewer. Isn't that something for your FAQ ;-).


stewer ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 10:07 AM

file_99224.jpg

*By the way, there is no such problem with Poser4.* Yes, there is. See the picture. Even worse, in Poser 4 you don't have the shadow bias parameter that can fix self-shadowing in most situations.


stewer ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 10:23 AM

file_99225.jpg

Here's the same artifact in Maya 5 PLE. It's a general problem with shadow maps flat angles.


Tintifax ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 10:41 AM

file_99226.jpg

So it's not my fault, but at least there are several options to deal with it. I post an additional render I did with Poser4 render in Poser5. I didn't see the pattern there.


ynsaen ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 10:55 AM

Well glad That at least the answer came about! I only wanted to see the light set so I could maybe come up with a workaround that keeps the basic lighting system for you and to analyze the issue more closely. If Stewer's points help out, then groovy!

thou and I, my friend, can, in the most flunkey world, make, each of us, one non-flunkey, one hero, if we like: that will be two heroes to begin with. (Carlyle)


Tintifax ( ) posted Sat, 21 February 2004 at 11:49 AM

Well, thanks anyway. Don't know how many are still following us. This was the last blocking point for my project. Just have to do the documentation and up to testing it goes. Thanks for all your help - Walter


Techware3D ( ) posted Thu, 13 April 2006 at 1:14 AM

Quote - Diolma has it dead on, Walter. Firefly does not render single sided planes very well in certain circumstances, and also does not handle places where two flat planes slightly overlap as well. Maya had the same issue with a couple of rendering engines it was using a generation back or so. The secret is to take a math node, set it to Subtract, change the first value to 0.05, and plug it into the displacement channel, which is then set at something like 0.01 or so. This will usually make the issue go away. Hope this helps :)

marked

JD Wohlever
Techware 3D


stonemason ( ) posted Thu, 13 April 2006 at 1:19 AM

pity there isn't a way to bookmark a thread without bringing it back to the top of the forum

Cg Society Portfolio


Techware3D ( ) posted Thu, 13 April 2006 at 1:43 AM

Actually, LOL I just found a way.. At bottom of message before the Reply body hit the SUBSCRIBE button... DOH!

JD Wohlever
Techware 3D


stonemason ( ) posted Thu, 13 April 2006 at 2:05 AM

thats good :)

..but  a shame too as I was curious about what other threads may be revived from the dead

 

I've found the best way for saving is to use the favourites folder in IE,I've got material threads saved in one folder,lights & cameras in another..etc,etc

this thread is over 2 years old & I doubt its still being replied to so subscribing isnt much use

 

Cheers

Stefan

Cg Society Portfolio


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.