Forum Moderators: TheBryster
Bryce F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Oct 30 3:44 am)
rolls eyes Thanks for those interesting yet coughanalcough remarks. Allow me to make a few of my own: 1. The challenge was never fully laid out or moderated as far as I'm concerned. It did not mention what exactly we would be modelling but generally stated the crystal palace and gave an obscure reference shot to it. While AS was mentioned as the moderator of the challenge, I don't recall him making any threads towards an acceptance of that fact. As far as I understood the challenge, the main idea was to model the crystal palace with Wings3D only while Bryster would do it with booleans. Initially, I did take it upon myself to model the ENTIRE thing. 2. To be an asshole, I was not perfectly happy with the idea of the challenge, since it was something potentially massive that would ultimately come down to who had the bigger, better computer. I'm not sure if you've really followed it, but the three people that have done it, myself, Bryster and brycetech had something around the lines of 300 (and 190 after), 300 and 700mb respectively in terms of scene sizes. Granted, brycetech did go ahead and modelled the whole thing. What it came down to was creating a few start-up models and multi-replicating those ad-nauseam. Unless Bryster would model the Simbel statues with booleans, I don't see how those might be included in the challenge (as were the plants, which would obviously be imports for both of us). 3. To model the statues or the plants was therefore ridiculous. To expect someone to make a perfect replica with barely any reference material is also idiotic. To continue on a scene in Bryce of all programs (or any rendering program) when it reaches 300mb is idiotic. It might take mad skills in Bryce to boolean model a couple of farkin' hexagonal beams and that trancept or whatever you call it, but in Wings it's a piece of cake. Replicating them is not a challenge. As well, as I recall, Bryster did have quite a head start on me by having access to the original drawings and so on (he can correct me if I'm wrong) while my only points of reference where the two pictures I had from the abu simbel expo and the university thing which was devoid of any farkin' trees. My mistake. 4. In terms of the actual render I made, that was my decision, after the model had been taking up 300mb on my 30gig hard disk. I cut it down to 190 or whatever by losing the windows. Bryster was largely unavailable as he toiled on his version, and I had 100 more interesting ideas going through my head. So I made a render with a figure in the middle of it that I begged off someone since I don't have Poser. I enjoyed the challenge, ultimately, because it did pose some general problems in terms of organizing it in Bryce and scaling things properly and so on. But I was happy to end it like that since I knew that I had finished it in less than a week in terms of modelling. I'm sorry if the idea and the PS filters have attacked your sense of artistic taste, but my thought was to covey the greatness of that hall together with the age of the building. 5. You have absolutely ZERO right to imply that I am childish or for that matter criticize my art in any way, shape or form. Bryster did not let me know of the fact that he was posting that thread, or asked permission from me to use my work, and he did not use my latest piece in asking for votes. I don't specifically care about the first two points as much as the third. I'm not mad at him or anything, since I didn't even expect him to finish the piece given the huge scene size that I was fighting with and that he himself met. Since I didn't really care of who won or whatever at that point, I conceded to him, as you might have read in my last post on the matter. I felt that it didn't really matter in the end, since it was a friendly challenge between two people who loved what they did. To boot, I did think his was significantly better in terms of exactness. Then again he did have more reference material than myself. 6. "Bye now...................Dennis" ? WTF is that? You're accusing me of childishness and then perform a hit and run? Screw you and the connection you rode in on. When I'll need critique for my work I'll be sure not to ask a self-important and long-winded idiot with a Crystal Palace beam stuck up his ass. Mihnea
Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=536763&Start=1&Artist=Dennisld&ByArtist=Yes
Now if only you'd been smart enough, drac, you coulda just copied the attached, and been SURE of a) accuracy b) winning And give over with that 'fun' thing - this is a serious business ;^)there's a big nose, who knows, and trips you up and laughs when you fall
-The Smiths, Cemetary Gates..;) The collary is that somewhere on the net, there's going to be someone who knows more about any one thing than you do..I don't remember seeing your artistic license revoked any time recently, Drac..whether it's the accuracy or detail (there was that girder in section 3, where you popped a rivet..just zoom in x1000 times, you can see sunlight going through it clear down to the floor..;)it's more trouble than I was prepared to go to..;) we'll just have to agree to disagree..though sometimes, me boy, you do seem a magnet for controversy..;)
I wish I'd said that.. The Staircase Wit
anahl nathrak uth vas betude doth yel dyenvey..;)
If he was the judge and there was a $1 millon dollar prize, then let there be such analytical and nit-picking criticism. But the challenge was done just for the heck of it, and the only thing the winner could really claim at most is bragging rights. So what if it's not %100 perfect - who cares? It's still pretty amazing that they both got as far as they did.
Your friendly neighborhood Wings3D nut.
Also feel free to browse my freebies at ShareCG.
There might be something worth downloading.
Available on Amazon for the Kindle E-Reader
All the Woes of a World by Jonathan Icknield aka The Bryster
And in my final hours - I would cling rather to the tattooed hand of kindness - than the unblemished hand of hate...
Careful, Drac! You're in danger of becoming a diplomat! Hats off to ya! I'll post a heads-up when I've updated my site.
Available on Amazon for the Kindle E-Reader
All the Woes of a World by Jonathan Icknield aka The Bryster
And in my final hours - I would cling rather to the tattooed hand of kindness - than the unblemished hand of hate...
Beyond gratuitous spleen venting, I'm not sure what this thread was about, LOL. It seemed to have something to do with the Crystal Palace challenge, but exactly what, I don't know. Hope everyone feels better now. :^)
This is not my "second childhood". I'm not finished with the first one yet.
Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.
"I'd like to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather....not screaming in terror like the passengers on his bus." - Jack Handy
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Since it was my original post[http://www.renderosity.com/messages.ez?Form.ShowMessage=1893915 (19th. August 2004)] that started this at times, quite tedious 'challenge' I hope you don't mind if I personally make one or two observations. The photograph, part of a newly discovered two-book collection, which I originally posted, was of the Egyptian rooms in the Ninevah Room of the North Transept of the Crystal Palace circa 1853. The collection of photographs eventually sold at auction for 13,500, three times estimate. English Heritage and the Crystal Palace Foundation were the successful bidders, thank God for historians and philanthropic organisations. Draculaz has made a representative image of the North Transept of the 1851 build Crystal Palace at Hyde Park in London. In doing so he has all but ignored the 'master' photograph, which I posted with my original thread. Draculaz seems not to have read TheBrysters original challenge thread, 'Instead of you and me doing the September 'Mystery' challenge, we'll go head to head on a render of the Crystal Palace as posted.' Obviously the challenge referred to the Crystal Palace building as posted and not any old Crystal Palace building, albeit the original. Virginia University is obviously an esteemed place of learning but if you take as your reference point a building which was dismantled at least six years before the building in the 'posted' photograph you cannot expect too many brownie points for accuracy! You may wonder why the design was changed between the two builds. It was probably over the worry that the original building may have one day given way to resonance and collapsed. Doubts were raised early on about the stability and safety of the 1851 structure - doubts which could not be ignored, as they were expressed by Professor Airey, the Astronomer Royal, and by Richard Turner, who had constructed the Palm House at Kew Gardens. The amount of strain on the iron girders was calculated not to be a problem, as they were designed to take several times the expected weight. What was seen as a problem was resonance - the worrying idea that a large crowd, moving regularly inside the structure, could cause it to vibrate more and more until it collapsed. An experiment was set up, with a test construction, on which 300 workmen walked backwards and forwards, regularly, irregularly, and then jumping simultaneously in the air. Finally, to induce the most regular oscillations possible, the army sappers and miners corps were called in, and marched repeatedly in step across the structure. The maximum girder movement was 1/4 inch, and building work was continued. But resonance may still have nagged and the rebuilt Crystal Palace suffered design change under the watchful eye of Paxton, the original builder. Back to Draculaz's picture it is difficult to judge but the scale of the figure apropos the Transept cannot be accepted without further reference points. The Transept was 48-ft. wide at this juncture and 108-ft. high. And why the tint to the picture? Black and white photography was possible in the late 1850's, as demonstrated here by Philip Delamotte, his photographs being taken somewhere between 1858 and 1862. Mr.Delamotte, part of the second generation of British photographers also taught drawing to the Royal family. There is no need for an artificially ageing filtered tint as the structure is so obviously of a bygone era, if not the solitary figure, a sap to modernism in my humble opinion, and again not true to the original premise of the challenge or the building itself. A liberty in other words. It would have done better to introduce a near 100-ft elm tree beneath the arched roof, the reason why the Transept was added in the first place. To protect and preserve two elms (one at either end). Thank God for naturalists. It is also difficult to ignore the petulance demonstrated by some of Draculaz' remarks in wishing to redraw the rules, amend his image etc., etc., A juvenile attitude only compounded by words such as ' I admit Bryster's slightly better than mine'. Grudging praise indeed! TheBrysters picture is obviously the superior effort here although I would strongly recommend removing that horrible sky and replacing with a near single and unobtrusive colour alternative. In any event the picture is a much better one after desaturation even with the sky! Vote......TheBryster by the proverbial country mile. Bye now...................Dennis