Forum Moderators: wheatpenny
Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Feb 25 7:08 am)
Sheila,
The first 2 are really good (IMO). The branches and that little piece of the lakeshore lead my eyes right to the old fallen tree. There's more of a connection (they all fit together and are related in someway). I also like that the shadow casted allows us to see some of the lakebed under the water (added details).
The 3rd (postworked) one seems a bit to contrasty...vivid yet darker, water is too blue and the shadow is now completly obscuring the wonderful underwater details.
The other shots just seem "off"...too much empty space as was commented by others and the tree seems to be floating in space to me, no connection to the lakeshore (as in the first shot.) The land and branches at top these images are distracting as well. This pulls my eyes away from the main subject (the tree).
Hope this helps!
L8r
Joe!
Message edited on: 02/26/2005 19:21
Message edited on: 02/26/2005 19:21
Message edited on: 02/26/2005 19:22
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a24a/3a24a4884f2c116d8aeb3c389fb63c6fc6c9fd52" alt="file_191276.jpg"
i took 3 shots of this log. here's the first shot. the next two pics that follow show some postwork i've done. this is not finished by any means. i'm still playing around. in terms of compo, what do you think? you find those branches on the left distracting. i took a few other shots without the branches but not sure i like them. if i have time before work, i'll post those as well. let's see what i have time for... thanks guys! here's the original.