Sat, Jan 11, 4:48 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Carrara

All Forums

Welcome to the Carrara Forum

Forum Coordinators: Kalypso

Carrara F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Jan 10 10:15 am)

 

Visit the Carrara Gallery here.

Carrara Free Stuff here.

 
Visit the Renderosity MarketPlace - Your source for digital art content!
 

 

Subject: C4 depth of field question

tkane18 opened this issue on Mar 04, 2005 · 4 posts
Back to Forum Print
tkane18 ( ) posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 11:59 AM · edited Sat, 27 July 2024 at 10:59 PM

file_194386.jpg

I know when C4 was coming out, many of the users got excited with ray traced DOF. I have been playing with the latest demo and really can't tell the difference between normal and ray traced depth of field. I know one is done during the render and the other is done post but considering the render times for the ray traced version, why would I want to use that? Here are two examples. If there is a quality difference, it is very subtle.

MarkBremmer ( ) posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 12:53 PM

Raytraced DOF works through transparency and alpha masks/planes. Regular DOF does not and will keep everything "in focus" if it occurs behind something transparent. Mark





tkane18 ( ) posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 1:59 PM

I knew an excellent user would have an excellent answer for my question. Thanks.

ayodejiosokoya ( ) posted Sun, 06 March 2005 at 7:05 AM

I think the bluring looks more natural in the images I have seen using raytraced dof. Regular seems to create an odd halo effect and I cant really get good results from it.

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.