Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Jan 02 11:49 pm)
I'm in the camp of "whatever floats your tools", or however that goes. I honestly thing the TOS here and at DAZ is way overblown, but it is their site and they can do with it as they desire....and of course, we have a choice of being here or there or not...and if we stay, we must abide by their silly TOS. But then it comes full circle to the original post, which I think may hsve been misworded to convey the child porn thingy....if there is a TOS , it must be followed across the board by everyone...equally..no favoritism. The thing I doon't like is when people are trying to tell me what I can't see, can't read, can't do..that is none of their business....and then they try to make all kinds of rules and laws to comply with their sense of morality.
Humankind has not
woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it.
Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound
together.
All things connect......Chief Seattle,
1854
BOING...brainstorm... we should set up a committee of members...we could be our own judge and jury...to over-ride and keep watchdog on the rendo interpretations... we could call it the "equality and fairness panel" yes...... Well, enough of this..I'm going to watch some NCAA hoops..college basketball is a blast.
Humankind has not
woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it.
Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound
together.
All things connect......Chief Seattle,
1854
Hmmm... This is SO stupid on SO many levels. It's a character set. It takes a product that looks like a young teen girl and makes her look like a hot 20 something woman. Somehow I don't think the mesh is going to call Child Services. I don't think it's "parents" or other concerned meshes will either. Frankly, I don't think Child Services would take the case anyway, since it's a MESH, not a living person. It's gets worse. Think about it. Child pornographers WANT the figures in their pictures to look young and innocent. Wrynmaster's set makes the figure an ADULT. It's actually useless to the kiddy porn people, since it won't give them the results they want. Get a life people.
Ad Hoc committes already exist that keep watchdog on Rendo interpretions, but they are generally classed by the PTB as troublemakers, old guard (Jack and Ed supporters), Poser Forum ride-into-town Terrorists (big list there), mavericks, and general lunatics (I can think of at least one there).
The real question is in which category we put ourselves? ;0)
"No hair on their big toes!!!" giggles and points at Netherworks hairy toes
"It is good to see ourselves as
others see us. Try as we may, we are never
able to know ourselves fully as we
are, especially the evil side of us.
This we can do only if we are not
angry with our critics but will take in good
heart whatever they might have to
say." - Ghandi
Well there is a big difference between marketing and the finished render. Bottom line, every render is judged on what it looks like. Turn Vicky into a 14-year-old child and put her in a sexual situation and you are going to be turfed off this site and most others. So it does not matter a damm what people produce and make, it is how you use that product. That is where the responsibility lies. Misuse or abuse of a product to produce Child Porn is the responsibility of the artist. You can use the standard V3 Morphs to produce a waif-like kid and and then use scaling to turn that mesh into a 12-year-old look-alike. Should DAZ withdraw V3 as a consequence?
So, hang on. Is it really the case that some people think that a mesh (i.e., a collection of polygons, vertices, etc.), which is based on an .obj file (a text file, for pity's sake), is somehow an actual person with a real life age? bonni
"When a man gives his opinion, he's a man. When a woman gives her opinion, she's a bitch." - Bette Davis
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
"I think I'm going to see if my Mil horse can get it on with the mil cat."
Rnderotica has had some interesting discussions on that whole topic with reference to bestiality depictions.
I am curious as to what the TOS here states as regards Beast on Beast sexual/reproduction images.
I have a friend who is a vet, and we have discussed the possible use of Poser to create a visual reference manual for farmers in Ireland that are going back to Bull on Cow fertilisation.
Just in case anyone thinks I am Joking, I am not.
AI or Artificial Insemination has been used for years in Ireland, however, farmers are now going back to the "natural methods" after many years, thus the interest in a visual manual.
Anyone got thoughts on the issue?
There is probably a whole market out there for pet breeding manuals, not to mention Zoos and rare species. From Goldfish to Hippos.
Message edited on: 03/11/2005 19:12