Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Feb 01 9:10 pm)
Attached Link: http://www.runtimedna.com/photos/Graphic3338.jpg
Whoa what a ugly shadow in her right eye!! Oh my god it broke my glasses!! http://www.runtimedna.com/photos/Graphic3338.jpg"Color Temperature is a simplified way to characterize the spectral properties of a light source. While in reality the color of light is determined by how much each point on the spectral curve contributes to its output, the result can still be summarized on a linear scale."
See also Light and Vision
"Color Temperature is a simplified way to characterize the spectral properties of a light source.
My point all along has been that GWeb continually complains about the RENDERER. This statement clearly makes the point that color temperature relates to the LIGHT SOURCES. Not THE RENDERER. Case closed. Over and out.
Message edited on: 03/20/2005 09:35
Attached Link: http://www.runtimedna.com/photos/Graphic3338.jpg
Case opened. Not over and back in. Haha you have very bad point. Poser is 3D software with human characters and animation functions. It provided lights to create light sources for the renderer!! I as a rightful customer who may complaint about the renderer may say that Poser's renderer ARE BAD!!! The Shadow is not real world shadow, the way poser renderer is programmed are wrong!! The shadow are supposed to DECREASE COLOR TEMPATURE!! SHADOW ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE COLORED!! If you want to learn some more about black light there is one that sends out violet scale. sheeesh I have proved that colored shadow r UGLY!! Gentlements and ladies, beware if you have heart condition or sensitive to the image please do not go to the link I posted.SHADOW ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE COLORED!! Well then why are you complaining that Poser has a "coal paint render?" Coal doesn't have any color either. You are contradicting yourself so much it's not funny. You won't find me answering or responding to your posts any more, GWeb. As far as I am concerned you are trolling and it has gone beyond absurd. My only regret is that I didn't start ignoring you sooner.
Geez The way Renderer r programmed in shadow part is coloring the image, it did not interact with color tempature and light sources. I never said that coal is color. I said that the way renderer paints the image is like 'Coal Paint Render'. Please quit playing mind game, you are not gonna win because I do know the different between void light and color absorption, and black (voilet scale). Please accept the fact that I made the point!
GWeb, I can't quite figure out what you're trying to say. I've some knowledge of colour temperature, from the PoV of a photographer, and some idea of why what an instrument records can be very different from what the human visual system sees. I know about the difference between additive and subtractive colour mixing. But, looking at what you've written, and at the absence of any of your wonderful pictures, all I can say is that, for all I know, you're a nobody. I've posted Poser renders, I've posted photographs, people can see what I've done. But you?
I have cautious optimism about Poser 6, based on what people have said. But I don't plan to rush, and not entirely because of the reputation of the first release of Poser 5. It's going to need me to spend some scarce cash on my computer before I can run it. And, so far, people haven't said anything about the resources the needed. I'm waiting for some solid claims about the memory P6 needs to run well in the real world, not the (usually) optimistic claims of manufacturers. The stuff it promises to do looks very tempting. The reports are good, But, for me, net yet...
http://www.exploratorium.edu/snacks/colored_shadows.html While a simplification this link explains that shadows are not black and white, and why. If the argument is that colored shadows are ugly all I can say is that is an interpritation, not a proof, quite different. I thought VanGogh was ugly for the longest time, now I can appricate it. Software interpritations of real world lighting and rendering are getting better and better all the time. Maya's render engine is quite powerful, yet the MentalRay render engine is a more powerful renderer for Maya. Also the comment that Poser 6 is doing it wrong might just be the artist not the application, remember that all the promo pictures posted so far for Poser 6 are from Beta testers. If the software a chance to be shipped, try it and make your statement after you have used it, maybe others have a way to acheive what you are looking for in your renders. That is what this forum is all about. Just another tid bit, CL did not create the Poser 6 renderer. It is a licenced render engine, so the fault might not be CL or Poser.
Yes, but you seem to be the only one who harps on it for... checks ...25 posts in a 77-post thread. Most people seem to realize that it's both a very low-end program and that they can fix it in postwork. Why are you bothering with P6, anyways? If you have money to burn and can't find anything else to buy with it, I can always give you a list of charities who need help. ^_^
No you are very discouragous, you need to stop degrading Poser into flintstone. We need to encourage CL, beta testers to improve Poser's renderer engine. I can not deny that Poser is indeed a good investment for hobby and business. I very much want to see renderer get improved. Quit throwing rocks at me when I try to do something!!
You really don't get it, do you? You're alienating people who would ordinarily rally behind you if you had made your point in an intelligent, non-confrontational and NON-WHINING manner. As it is, you've come off as a spoiled brat who got the toy he demanded all winter, but didn't get this ONE ACCESSORY and now he's going to hold his breath 'til he turns BLUE. Hell, I would have backed you if you hadn't acted like a twit.
Mods,
This sort of harrassment looks like the work of a classic troll to me: smelly and offensive. All GWeb is doing is bitching for the sake of bitching, and he doesn't appear to have a sound leg to stand upon. I enjoy a good argument upon its merits, but there is no merit here. I'd suggest that if he is that totally obsessed with color temperature in shadows, that he go back to industrial CAD systems where such things are important and his views might even be marginally relevant. Yes, in producing steel, the color temperature is vital; but, no, in producing art it is totally absolutely positively unimportant. If I'm painting purple shadows in the snow that is because I'm seeing purple, not because I'm on my knees with a thermometer! It is not even a miniscule point.
It isn't fun. It isn't productive. It isn't helpful.
He can hop and down like Rumpelstiltskin and post every 10 minutes, and his fixation upon shadow temperature still will have nothing to do with any of the renderers or any of the possibilities inherent in this program.
If a THIRD of the posts in this thread are GWeb throwing rocks for the sake of exercising his typing fingers rather than his mind, I think it is time to lock this pup up. Me? I've got better things to do than feed trolls.
Carolly
Message edited on: 03/20/2005 19:21
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Well you should let it pass and you may get some rest for yourself.