Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 21 6:06 am)
My CPU with 4GigRam sits here, awatin'. AMD Athlon 64 3500+ Operating Frequency 2.2GHz FSB Integrated into Chip Cache Level 1 64KB+64KB; Level 2 512KB Socket 939 Even though this is a great chip, I am beginning to suspect, through interaction with other Poser power users, that the lack of 1024 L2 cache is a serious drag on an otherwise smokin' setup. But bring on XP 64! I'm ready. ::::: Opera :::::
LOL! We've Linux x86_64 on one of the work servers for years... 'bout time Microsoft caught up (evil grin.) In all seriousness though, they would have to re-compile Poser to take advantage of the new environment before it became of any real use, otherwise it ends up running in some sort of 32-bit compatibility mode. /P
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Just read at the Tech Report that the 64 bit version of windows is expected to assign 4 GB of usable memory (rather than the former 2 GB maximum) to 32 bit processes (e.g. like Poser 5/6 being run on Windows 64 bit edition). If this is true, and if Poser can use it, then it will effectively double the amount of memory that can be used without any need for a re-compiled version of Poser (or any other 32 bit app for that matter). Has anyone got a 64 bit PC with Windows for 64 bit (the latest beta release candidate) and 4GB or more of memory - and can you confirm this improvment does actually happen? Sadly I still only have a 32 bit PC, but I'd really like to know if an upgrade would be worth it. Regards and thanx, Jovial.