First a default V3 texture with default Poser lighting

Probably take me a couple of weeks to do the Python depending on how much time I can spend on it :-)

Holy COw!!!!!

This looks really cool.  In the last pic, I really like the "mottled" effect of the capillaries.  Can you try to add in a vein effect pattern? Thanks, -Starkdog

The last image is really looking great !

I'd really like to have a look at your shader setup.

Martin

i have no idea how python works and i see it you don't want feedback on anything but the skin in relation to the shade or light.

it looks great so far.

from the point of view of light it looks like a bit too much overhead. i have no idea how to solve it though.

billy

is it all shader nodes, or based on a texture?

Go talk to bagginsbill.  He's working on a python-based goodie called "matmatic" that may be a big help.  There's some threads on RDNA's forum that show's off some skin texturing he's done with Jesse.

It's a combination of the standard V3 texture map and then a lot of shader nodes to add fastscatter, tweak the specular settings, add some noise and texture (spots etc.)

Tweaking the lighting is fairly easy once the shaders are set up, though there is a large interaction between the correct specular settings in particular and the lighting set up - as I have it here, then yes, it is burned out a little from above. Here is another shot with subtly different lighting

Thanks for the suggestions re help with Python, but I shouldn't have a problem, I code software for a living - getting the shader set up right is more of an issue.

Here is an overview of my shader set up as is (without details, it's cluttered enough as is)

If you're a coder, tbird10, then I'm thinking you want to play with matmatic even more  It lets you write some pretty heinous shader set ups using Python functions.  Some of bagginsbill's example had 47(!) nodes.  I think you'll find it a lot easier to twiddle parameters from a script file rather than track the "clutter" in your Material room ;-)

If you don't mind me asking, is this for an eventual RMP product?  I was curious what parameters you were using, but I didn't know if you had them hidden for a reason.

No, initially it will be a freebie, then as it develops I may consider it for the marketplace if I ever think it offers enough for someone to pay for it.

I just couldn't get a reasonably sized screenshot with everything expanded :-)

I've had a quick look at the RDNA thread - I may drop him a line :-)

Heh, I thought matmatic might interest you (we programmers have to look out for each other ;-)  The python side's easy for me to grasp, but I'm still trying to get a handle on the "art" of procedural shading.   That's why I was asking about the parameters and if it's not too much a bother, I'd like to know what they are.

Here is a face close up - I've not worked on the eyes yet, a lighting set up that is good for skin is not so good for eyes.

Attached Link: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1558608486/keindesign-20?creative=327641&camp=14573&adid=00WA1ACA896NPH67CG58&link_code=as1

Not really related to skin shading, but "Texturing and Modeling - a procedural approach" is probably the book for procedurals in general, especially for us programming nerds. See the link.

Thanks for the rec, stewer.  I'd see it pop up on google searches, but wasn't sure it was worth the price of admission.

One of the main contributers to this book is Ken Musgrave aka Doc Mojo, author of MojoWorld. Some of the chapters could almost be labelled "how to write your own MojoWorld"...lots of info on procedural terrains, clouds or atmospheres (but not only that).

Cool.  I'm getting tired of watching bagginsbill whip out these crazy-cool textures and me wondering how the hell he did it.  ;-)

You guys keep making me laugh. :)

Tbird10 - That looks very good. I'm supposed to be working on some software for work, but now I'm going to study your shader for a while.

The render of her back is much better than of her face. The AO is distracting. It looks like she was sprayed with that graphite lubricant you use to get locks to work better.

You should try Matmatic and Parmatic - if you're good at Python, then you can turn out multiple variations of the shader on the same figure, so you can directly compare a few different settings in the same render. This saves a lot of time on the iterations.

Plus, exchanging shader trees with each other as scripts is much better than screenshots.

bagginsbill - We aim to please ;-)

stewer - Book's on order.  It was a real pain to find a used hardcover (tons of new "international" printings, if you don't mind paperbacks with black & white printing instead of color).  Looking forward to reading it.  (Watch out, bagginsbill!  I'll figure this stuff out yet! ;-)

Matt

Bagginsbill - Thanks, I've downloaded the matmatic beta and will give it a try and have a play.

IBL with AO can produce great results for 'body parts' but as you note, it isn't so good for the face. I need to have a play around with the lighting as well.

I'm still playing around with shader formation, I love the Poser node setup - it has the potential to be incredibly powerful.

Going to be busy the rest of this week, so no time to play until the weekend :-(

Happy to collaborate on shader settings/ideas

Tbird10 :-)

tbird - you might try selectively adding AO in the material room, rather than have it globally cast via lighting.  Face_off has an tutorial and RMP item for adding AO to specific objects, each with their own settings.

Matt

Tbird - I converted your shader to a matmatic script, which let me try thirty or so variations in a short time. You have a lot of nodes in there that aren't doing much, if anything.

Besides the color texture node itself, I've got it down to 4 nodes with no noticeable difference; one each of blender, fastscatter, skin, and spots.

I don't think you're using the fastscatter and skin in a way I've seen before. I'm experimenting with it, but I suspect it will have problems under diverse lighting conditions - it always does.

The shader tends to bloom a bit too much with IBL, but it's really interesting. I'll post more info as I get a better handle on it.

Tbird - very nice work! I will be watching your progress carefully - do keep us posted! Thanks.

Thanks for a really good thread.

Best Wishes,
Rªnce