Thu, Nov 28, 2:22 PM CST

Renderosity Forums / 3D Modeling



Welcome to the 3D Modeling Forum

Forum Moderators: Lobo3433

3D Modeling F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 24 8:50 pm)

Freeware 3D Modeling Software Links:
Blender | Trimble Sketchup | Wings 3D | Anim8or | Metasequoia | Clara IO (Browser-based 3d modeler)

Check out the
MarketPlace Wishing Well, as a content creator's resource for your next project.

"What 3D Program Should I buy?" Not one person here can really tell you what's best for you, as everyone has their own taste in workflow. Try the demo or learning edition of the program you're interested in, this is the only way to find out which programs you like.



Checkout the Renderosity MarketPlace - Your source for digital art content!



Subject: Indulging my inner Trekkie


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Sat, 04 November 2006 at 6:11 AM · edited Thu, 28 November 2024 at 2:18 PM

file_358478.jpg

In my quest to come up with a recognizably Star Trek ship that isn't just another rehash of the Enterprise, I've been futzing around with the following design. This is just a concept model, so it's extremely basic. Any comments or critiques are most welcome.

Guy


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Sat, 04 November 2006 at 6:11 AM

file_358479.jpg


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Sat, 04 November 2006 at 6:12 AM

file_358480.jpg


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Sat, 04 November 2006 at 6:12 AM

file_358481.jpg


Dann-O ( ) posted Sat, 04 November 2006 at 8:41 AM

Maybe do a new function for a trek ship. Like try a modular design with different shaped modules for different missions or a carrier. Good start.

The wit of a misplaced ex-patriot.
I cheated on my metaphysics exam by looking into the soul of the person next to me.


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Mon, 06 November 2006 at 4:56 AM · edited Mon, 06 November 2006 at 5:09 AM

file_358728.jpg

My latest progress. I think I like this version enough that I may start working on the details now. Let me know what you think.

My goal with this design was to come up with a design that fit somewhere between the NX-01 and the NCC-1701, without being yet another kitbash of either one.  I haven't seen any fan-designed ship that has the twin nacelles vertically aligned, nor with the two pylons per nacelle arrangement.

 I also wanted to follow, or at least not seriously break, Gene Roddenberry's rules on starship design. I moved the bridge unit forward; it's the only part of the ship that really defies Roddenberry's rules. (Well, the nacelles are slightly obstructed from the front view, but not completely.) I rationalize that the bridge sits in the center of the oil drum, if not the saucer itself.  Since this is a sort of experimental design from the early days of starship design, I figure the rules might not have been too well established.


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Mon, 06 November 2006 at 4:57 AM

file_358729.jpg


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Mon, 06 November 2006 at 4:57 AM · edited Mon, 06 November 2006 at 4:59 AM

file_358730.jpg

The little box at the back of the dark wedge shape is a placeholder for the shuttlecraft hangar.


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Mon, 06 November 2006 at 4:58 AM

file_358731.jpg


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Mon, 06 November 2006 at 5:04 AM

file_358733.jpg


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Mon, 06 November 2006 at 5:18 AM

Roddenberry's starship design rules, incidentally, are at http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/design.htm


TDO ( ) posted Tue, 07 November 2006 at 11:08 AM

It is starting to come togather :)

I like the nacell setup. 

Dyslexia: creatively misspelling won word at a time even with a spell checker.


Cyba_Storm ( ) posted Wed, 08 November 2006 at 5:17 AM · edited Wed, 08 November 2006 at 5:18 AM

Canon is for those lacking imagination. The star fleet engineers would still be building NX 01's if they were made up of people insisting on things being canon.

I love seeing something different. Keep up the good work.


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Wed, 08 November 2006 at 10:02 PM

Oh, I'm not even trying for anything canonical; I really just want something interesting-looking. Thanks for the compliment!

Guy


danamo ( ) posted Thu, 09 November 2006 at 11:56 PM

Looking really good! I like how you're refining the mesh and details. I agree with Cyba. In this case "Canon" could be a crutch for a person with lesser imagination. It definitely is "interesting looking".:)


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Fri, 10 November 2006 at 6:02 AM

I haven't had much time this week to work on it, but I should add some more refinements tonight, especially to the nacelles.


pearce ( ) posted Fri, 10 November 2006 at 6:23 AM

If those drive supporting members were slanted back they'd be better able to withstand and transmit acceleration forces when the drive is on.


Gog ( ) posted Fri, 10 November 2006 at 8:25 AM

A good point pearce, I think a V might look cool (one slanting forward one backward,)

----------

Toolset: Blender, GIMP, Indigo Render, LuxRender, TopMod, Knotplot, Ivy Gen, Plant Studio.


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Fri, 10 November 2006 at 12:58 PM

I considered that, but a couple of things made me go with the current shape: 1) I'm still pretty new at this, and the straight pylons were easier than the slanted pylons. 2) I'm sort of using the Christopher Pike-era as a starting point and working backwards from there; my current thought is that this ship predates the NCC-1701 by a couple of decades, so the straight pylons make more sense.  (Yeah, I know, the NX-01 and numerous fan-designed pre-TOS ships shoot a hole in that argument, but I'm following my muse here.)

When I have time to sit down and work on the pylons seriously, I'll try it out and see what I can do with the slanted pylons. Thanks for the suggestion!

Guy


pearce ( ) posted Fri, 10 November 2006 at 6:36 PM

Actually it always seemed to me that having the drives offset from the centreline of the ship would cause it to pitch downward under acceleration, and go in circles LOL.  But you can't get too bogged down in technical reality or you lose the fantasy element, so follow your muse by all means :)

They have all sorts of impossible stuff anyway.


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Fri, 10 November 2006 at 10:42 PM

file_359156.jpg

Been working on the nacelles.


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Fri, 10 November 2006 at 10:43 PM

file_359157.jpg


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Fri, 10 November 2006 at 10:43 PM

file_359158.jpg


Dann-O ( ) posted Fri, 10 November 2006 at 11:26 PM

Nice looking nacelles. starting to shape up there.

The wit of a misplaced ex-patriot.
I cheated on my metaphysics exam by looking into the soul of the person next to me.


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Sun, 12 November 2006 at 10:23 AM

file_359310.jpg

Very productive work late last night. I added or changed a number of things. The "outer saucer" now has a chunk of "pie" cut out and visible from the front, exposing the navigational deflector as well as the "inner saucer".

I added a horizontal central cylinder to house the navigational deflectors (fore) and the hangar (aft). 12 lights serve to guide approaching ships to the rectangular hangar door.

There are 3 single-mount phasers on the top of the "drum", and 3 more on the bottom. There are 2 more rear-mounted phasers above and below the hangar entrance, but that's just because I couldn't figure out a better placement at this time. Comments are welcome.

I don't have any photon torpedo launcers set up at this time, and I'm not sure where I want to place them. To port and starboard of the navigational deflector, maybe?

I wanted the impulse engines to look relatively antiquated (compared to the 1701), so I made them big and boxy, and gave them circular exhaust vents (as opposed to the standard square ones).

I played around with the nacelles a bit more, adding an illuminated cylinder for the blue "warp glow" effect. I know this wasn't a TOS feature, but heck, if the NX-01 has it, why not this ship, too?

Comments, as always, are appreciated.

Guy


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Sun, 12 November 2006 at 10:23 AM

file_359311.jpg


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Sun, 12 November 2006 at 10:24 AM

file_359312.jpg


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Sun, 12 November 2006 at 10:24 AM

file_359313.jpg


Digital_Assassin ( ) posted Sun, 12 November 2006 at 11:40 AM


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Sun, 12 November 2006 at 11:52 AM

file_359322.jpg

Now for some size comparisons with the NCC-1701.


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Sun, 12 November 2006 at 11:53 AM · edited Sun, 12 November 2006 at 11:55 AM

file_359323.jpg

I had to fiddle around with the scale a bit to get the size right. The impression I'm going for is that my ship is a bit antiquated next to the Connie.  How do you think it stacks up?


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Sun, 12 November 2006 at 12:40 PM · edited Sun, 12 November 2006 at 12:42 PM

file_359330.jpg

I scaled it up some more. This is amore what I had in mind.Guy


Dann-O ( ) posted Sun, 12 November 2006 at 5:43 PM

Startign to look really good. A bit more with teh textures and it will be set. Maybe ready for a fan film.

The wit of a misplaced ex-patriot.
I cheated on my metaphysics exam by looking into the soul of the person next to me.


Gog ( ) posted Mon, 13 November 2006 at 4:42 AM

Looking good. One thing that looks a liitle odd is the arc of the antenna dish, there's a huge difference between yours and the connie, makes it look alittle odd when side by side

----------

Toolset: Blender, GIMP, Indigo Render, LuxRender, TopMod, Knotplot, Ivy Gen, Plant Studio.


pauljs75 ( ) posted Sat, 09 December 2006 at 7:05 AM

Looks very ST-universe inspired regardless of what some people claim for conventions. Who says it can't be an "alien" adaptation of warp drive technology, then it doesn't have to abide by the Federation "conventions" of spaceship design. If I didn't know any better, I'd swear there was a Ferengi vessel in one STNG episode that almost looked like what you put together.


Barbequed Pixels?

Your friendly neighborhood Wings3D nut.
Also feel free to browse my freebies at ShareCG.
There might be something worth downloading.


ghoyle1 ( ) posted Sat, 09 December 2006 at 5:01 PM

Quote - Looking good. One thing that looks a liitle odd is the arc of the antenna dish, there's a huge difference between yours and the connie, makes it look alittle odd when side by side

 

Thanks! Of course, this is intended to be an older ship than the connie, so various details would be different.

Guy


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.