Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon
Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Jan 22 8:17 pm)
My standard lens is a Sigma 18-50 f:2.8.
But, depending on whether I go hunting landscapes or insects, I walk around with the Sigma 10-20 (nearly always at 10 and corrected in Bibble) or the Sigma 105 which comes to 1:1.
If I could start again, I'd prefer to change that last one into a Sigma 150 1:1. But, like James Brown sang: " The way I like it, that's the way it is." It'll do.
There are no Borg. All
resistance is fertile.
My everyday lens is the Olympus Zuiko 14-45mm 3.5-5.6 that came as a kit lens with my Oly E-500. Although I got two macro lenses and two telezooms for other occasions, that old kit lens holds up pretty well as a general walkabout lens and I haven't really felt the need to upgrade to a faster and more expensive one... :o)
I'm waiting for the Zuiko 9-18mm to come out though... would love to try that one.
We do
not see things as they are. ǝɹɐ ǝʍ sɐ sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝs
ǝʍ
When I bought my Canon EOS 350D, I didn't want the lense that went along with the body in the kit, so I only bought the body and added my Sigma DC 18-200mm lense separately. It's the only lense I've got and I'm totally happy with it as it also works for close-ups pretty well (200mm with a minimum distance of 45cm). Still thinking about buying a "real" macro-lense but until then my close-up lenses that can be screwed to the front of the big one (bought them at ebay for 18euros incl. postage) will just have to do...
My Sigma 10-20 is generally attached to the body most of the time. It really depends on where i am going and what i'll be taking photos of / my aim for the day. My "lite" pack (sling bag) at the moment is my 10-20, 8mm fish and my 70-200. 20-70 gap you say... i hardly take anything at that range it seems. Sometimes i swap the 8mm for my 50mm.
And i have heard similar rumblings about a 10-24mm tamron... might be good to have the extra range i suppose and it will be a "new" lens which hopefully means better than the last "generation"...
"In every colour, there's the light.
In every stone sleeps a crystal.
Remember the Shaman, when he used to say:
Man is the dream of the Dolphin"
Rich Meadows Photography
I tend to either go wide or long. So it's 16 - 35 or straight to 100 - 400 and sometimes longer with a 1.4x extension. last Thursday I got a 24 - 105 so I'm trying that out at the moment. All my lenses are now Canon L lenses yes expensive but they are worth it the quality is so much better.
ecurb - The Devil
Must admit I tend to use my Sigma 10 - 20 a lot. Then comes my 24 - 85 which I use quite often.
I also a 70 - 300 that I hardly ever use.
I was just wondering how many of you guys and gals always find like myself that when ever you want to do something in a rush you never have the right lens on the camera :-)
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Just wondering is all....
My everyday lens is an 18-250mm on my A700. Seems to cover the range I use most....more reach would be nice....but I have the 500mm for that.
Looking to get a wide angle lens next....Sigma 10-20 was on my list, but now I hear Tamron will release a 10-24 in Canon/Nikon Mount. Hopefully a Sony/Minolta version won't be too far behind.
J:woot:e