... and how badly do you want it?

5 - OMG YES!

4 - yes, definitely

3 - yes

2 - sure why not

1 - maybe

If you don't want it, then please don't reply. If you want to discuss it, rather go to this thread, or make another thread.

I'm just doing a little amateur research on all sites. I just wanna see what number I can get (or is there a way to do a poll?)

Please I beg of you, no fighting on this thread, I don't wanna get it closed.

And .. a dude has toast intergraded  .. then "we" need to model all them morphs in the pants to fit your intergrated toast ..

not gonna happen for sure ..

toast is only needed with nudes, and no other renders needs them  ..

So im my book Intergraded toast for Males is pointless   female does not matter that much ..

5

if  female  then  5  male  not

Agree with Sa_raneth. Females: Yes absolutely.

Males - in that case I prefer a detachable tackle. Much easier to clothe the guy.

In any case, the geintals should be present/available and be properly textured.

5

yes sorry

female!!

I'm working on one.

5

5!

And just for the record for males also - yes! But with the option to remove them (ouch!) for draping dyamic clothes. Or an "underpants morph" maybe?

For male Figures there need to be a "squeeze into pants" morph. ... ah ... of course just about female ... sorry.  did I say 5 allready?  ;-)

5

5

5       Thank you E!

3D figures should be complete.

But my vote is a 3, with a question mark.

If Poser and D/S will ever get in trouble or even banned from public sale, it will be because of the porn industry.

A warning and a caution are in order.

**               5**

and since a percentage majority of the cgi porn I've seen has come out of asian markets, not gonna worry too much. There has been too many legal precedents set regarding the 1st amendment and objectionable content. Sure, if someone were to create anatomically correct and meant to be mated 12 year old representative meshes, there would probably be a firestorm. No store I know of would touch that with a 10 kilometer pole dipped in bleach. I strongly doubt they could find a hosting site & give it away free. 

Being wary of fanatics is one thing. Living in fear of being a grownup who wants to play in grownup ideas is another.  

Hey....nudes ain't just for porn...lol.

As long as it doesn't get in the way of clothes, I'm all for it.

5

Laurie

No doubt, you got a 5.

Female - 3

Male - OH, HELL NO!   A male with permanently attached gens doesn't work in the fitting room.

thanks for your input guys! keep em coming

FYI guys, if anyone want to discuss details of this concept, I made a thread:

http://www.renderosity.com/mod/forumpro/showthread.php?thread_id=2871310

Sure, why not.  I'll try anything if the price is right.

Of course a 5, if a 3d model is supposed to look realistic why have it neutered.

P5 Judy was fully equipped bust she never gained much applause. A female with modeled genitalia and bones/morphs to depict natural variation and 'state changes' is one thing. Natural fold/unfold of the skin in the groins and natural reaction to leg motions is something else. If you can ensure the latter, with proper flattening of the butt when bending the legs: a 5!

Quote - ... Natural fold/unfold of the skin in the groins and natural reaction to leg motions is something else. If you can ensure the latter, with proper flattening of the butt when bending the legs: a 5!

something like this? (warning, contains explicit nudity)

5

Quote - And .. a dude has toast intergraded  .. then "we" need to model all them morphs in the pants to fit your intergrated toast ..

not gonna happen for sure ..

toast is only needed with nudes, and no other renders needs them  ..

So im my book Intergraded toast for Males is pointless   female does not matter that much ..

adMan has them; there are two versions in the package; one with and without his package.

I'd vote a 3+, as a good conforming figure can usually substitute...

5

Oh, and what the heck ever happened to using Poser's built-in ability to do geometry switching (genitalia on/off)? If creators were willing to go to the extra step of creating two hips and using this function, we wouldn't have this problem or debate. 

Quote - 5

 

Oh, and what the heck ever happened to using Poser's built-in ability to do geometry switching (genitalia on/off)? If creators were willing to go to the extra step of creating two hips and using this function, we wouldn't have this problem or debate. 

One problem with geometry switching (which is a very clever concept!) is that you need to do all (body) morphs twice because of the difference in vertex count.

Quote -   One problem with geometry switching (which is a very clever concept!) is that you need to do all (body) morphs twice because of the difference in vertex count.

should be doable with 'Copy Morphs From', right?

One problem with geometry switching (which is a very clever concept!) is that you need to do all (body) morphs twice because of the difference in vertex count.

And the problem is?

Actually, hip morphs (that are NOT related to genetalia) tend to be general shaping morphs rather than  "detail" morphs. It would take about 30 seconds to transfer those kind of hip morphs from one figure to the other using Dimension3D's "Morph Cloth" program.

5

** 6**!

Quote - ** 6**!

lol

I was going to say 69 just to be a smartass...

However, realistically 2  
While I prefer built-in genitals on a figure, it is a low priority item when choosing a figure to use or support with content.

2  i suppose  maybe 3

but I question the purpose of this poll without offering a 0 option.  

It would be the same as asking a workplace satisfaction survey and only giving the options of satisfied, very satisfied and extremely satisfied...  result: congratulations team!! our employees are 100% satisfied with their workplace

sorry if i'm not taking this 100% serious, I'm actually taken aback that we really have a need for yet another thread on this topic

Quote - but I question the purpose of this poll without offering a 0 option.  

No I just wanna see how many people here would want it. The score is not very important maybe, but does give a slight indication how much it is desired.

I didn't offer a 0 because there are many non-genital figures available. So those guys are covered, I would presume.

5

5-omg yes! I fail to see the reason for leaving them out. You make a figure that is suppose to be anatomically correct but leave vital part of her out? to me it doesnt make sense.

5

5

5 it is, especially for female figures. Males? Meh

Quote - if  female  then  5  male  not

Agreed.

cinco... (that´s five :p )

**5  **All the way 

5!

5 definitely... but don't make her like that Lali girl... we want to apply our own morphs for her face and other bits... with Lai... you get Lai and bloody hard work to remove the bits you don't want, like her eyes that roll back in her head.

Quote - 5 definitely... but don't make her like that Lali girl... we want to apply our own morphs for her face and other bits... with Lai... you get Lai and bloody hard work to remove the bits you don't want, like her eyes that roll back in her head.

Yeah I've learnt my lessons from lali, it would've been better to make everything modular, so that you could select that you wanted from Lali's Bits. 

Its part of the reason I wanna make a figure, so that the injection process and the channels are controlled by me instead of DAZ! Then it is easier to make smaller modular injection packages.

5   :b_smile:

What you've done so far on Project E totally rocks my socks. I cannot wait to buy the finished model.

5

5 for me 

also a high poly base mesh gets a 5 from me

great work btw 

Absolutely a 5! and yes the exclamation implies a factorial. The way [Insert deity or cosmological constant of your choice] intended.

Even though I'm probably going to cover them up, I'd still say 5.  I sometimes have my female figure doing un-ladylike things, such as flashing her 24 year old, eligible bachelor gardener and getting little or no response.  Methinks maybe I created him with a four inch wide stripe of yellow chicken feathers running down the middle of his back.

Doric.