Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Jan 24 1:08 pm)
I'd rather stay in my lane than lay in my stain!
I think it does well as an apology. He stated that he believed it was a great thing and as a customer wanted to tell everyone. He now sees some of the issues involved and instead of countering them simply says he is sorry. As far as it goes this is good, especially since we haven't seen the full outcome as yet.
Hey Steve- Without getting into the whole Amy thing, just wanted to say I've always admired you as an artist, and I'm sorry to see you and Trav and all get caught up in something like this. I hope this doesn't discourage you too much, your talent and enthusiasm have been an asset to the community. Take care! Regards- Lemurtek
I am so sorry this happened to you. I really am. As I said sometime's artists work on something so much they forget they borrow from other. On some level Tom may truly believe the hands were his after awhile. The good from it is Tom will learn to do hands at the very least. :) It happens. It isn't your fault and you were just trying to promote for your friends. I still think the rest of Amy is skinned off of a morphed and resized Posette or other figures. I am sure there are many areas that Tom built himself but finding where original stated and copying finished is impossible once someone has stolen mesh. I never meant to put you in a bad spot as it says in my post. I was so hoping that you were being lied to and not apart of this. I think you are awesome for saying what you have said here and I think alot of you for it, not that my opinion means anything. Bravo and I am sorry this happened, Anton
-Anton, creator of
ApolloMaximus: 32,000+ downloads
since 3-13-07
"Conviction without truth is denial; Denial in the
face of truth is concealment."
Attached Link: http://modelbank.viewpoint.com/java/mbShowForm?mb_productid=708&imgfile=tp29534
Heh, I have sad sad news for you SmallSpace, but that model you love so above, is one that I also bought. I bought it for 49.00 as a MEMBER of REM Infografica's Model Bank, membership of which cost me 450.00 a year. Right around 1996 or 1997 thereabouts. ALL of the REM Infografica Inventory is now owned by Viewpoint Datalabs. Sad sad day this is. PAMOLA AND TOM KNIGHTS, WHAT DO YOU AND YOUR COMPANY HAVE TO SAY?Attached Link: http://www.iw43d.com/IW_FutrH_Img05.htm
Oh Good Gad! I also bought a WONDERFUL science fiction female named Rachel from REM Infografica at the same time period that I bought the one above. I still have these archived to my tape drive... she cost me 49.00 with my membership, and is now owned by Viewpoint Datalabs since they bought out REM Infografica. Guys, do you have permission from ViewPoint to resell Rachel? http://www.iw43d.com/IW_FutrH_Img05.htmAttached Link: http://modelbank.viewpoint.com/java/mbShowForm?mb_productid=882&imgfile=tp30207
And here is Viewpoints Rachel... I think you can see where their Rachel comes from quite easily.Hi Mehndi, I really didn't want to add anything to this post, but I do have to clear up this last little bit. I know of the Infografica model bank. The complete truth is that Tom did, indeed create all those figures. Before they were on the model bank, they were sold directly from Viewpoint for several hundred dollars a piece under the Imagination Works lable. That's where I first saw them. That was around 94 or 95, I think. Eventually Tom marketed them through Infografica's model bank (that's where I also purchaced them - on an "any 5 models for a fixed price" special). The d'Espona split with Infografica, the model bank went in two directions...one went with d'Espona and the other stayed with Infografica who then sold it to Viewpoint. In any case, it's my understanding that Imagination Works still owns the rights to all those models and I don't think there is any wrong doing in that case. -Steve
I'd rather stay in my lane than lay in my stain!
Ah, then if he is the original modeller of it, instead of dEspona and the other modellers at REM, which I thought were all Spanish modellers, I do sincerely apologize. This is what I would like to know though... did he model these things or not. This is very confusing, when you see evidence that he has frankensteined parts of Posette, it leads one to begin to worry about the whole product line. And as of yet, though Pamola said she was addressing it, she did not address it at all, again, this leads one to begin to dig and look for answers. So if I am wrong, I am sincerely sorry for being wrong, but I am not sorry for looking for answers since none were provided yet.
Well, I don't knwo anything about the hands... but I do know this... Tom has been a highly respected name in the "big league" circles of 3D for a long time and has proven himself over and over as a good guy and a good modeler. I see no reason at this point to change my opinion of him that way. If there is a problem with Amy well, I think it is probably an isolated incedent.
One of the great ironies here is that all of this hoo-hah is over P4 Nude Woman, a figure that many folks here regularly dismiss as being primitive, useless and generally not worth paying any attention to since the arrival of Vicky, Steph and the others. I guess this all just proves that there's still some life in the old gal yet! (P.S. I still think the P4 Nude Woman is great -- especially for animation).
"I see no reason at this point to change my opinion of him that way. If there is a problem with Amy well, I think it is probably an isolated incident." I agree. Though I haven't been on the 3D scene long enough to know who's who, the man is a fantastic modeler. Even I can see that in the products I have, and he and Pamola were quick to respond to my requests and questions. That's why I found this all very surprising. I'll reserve making my judgements until I hear definitively about the Amy model. Personally, I've found that statements made in haste at times come back to bite you in the butt. "I will put up a formal post (ON A NEW THREAD) tomorrow morning, to clear up all of the madness. It should alleviate any fears you might have about us, and/or answer all of your questions." This was from Pamola...... in LA it's pretty much still last night.
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
E-mail
| Renderosity
Homepage | Renderosity
Store | RDNA
Store
Smallspace: You've got this whole apology thing wrong. What you need to do is look everyone in the eye and insist that everything you did was absloutely above reporoach. Insist that it is obvious that everything you said, that looks to be in error, was in fact correct. Have your significant other point out that this whole thing was brought up by evil right wing conservative modelers. State boldly and loudly that you absolutely did not have sex with that women ...Ms. Amy.. Oh wait... that approach only seems to work in Washington.. Seriously... if more people had the courage to admit they were wrong we'd all be a lot better off. Almost everyone can forgive an honest mistake, nobody likes to be lied to; so good luck in all this. (Sometimes it's hazardous to be the point man..)
lol, hey smallspace, im sorry 2..... i laffed at you.... i was truly under an impression, (and wrongfully so) that you were aware of this, and was part of a "plot"....... i apologize... im still amazed at all the drama involved w/ what i thought was a hobby.... now i apologize 2 "all rosity members" 4 not seeing that this is some of yalls "life and likehood"....
Well, as a purchaser of Amy because of your reccomendation, I accept the apology. Really I wasn't mad at you at all, I know that I am not the only person who can be misled. Poop happens, you know? I am just disappinted because I was Psyched about working on Amy this weekend. (Not because I don't love all the models I have already, but I like jumping from one to another, keep me interested.) Instead I will be working with the Millenium Kids this weekend, since I really haven't done enough with them yet to have moved on to something else. Cost of Amy - $50.00 Cost of sincere apology - Priceless. Thanks =) JDexter
smallspace, you did a respectable thing with this post. God bless you. In the end, it's still possible that Amy is 100% original. I stated in the earlier post that the body seems to be different, but the hands objection seems to have merit. I'm no expert, but I know this, that you did the right thing with this post. In the future, it may turn out to be different in conclusion, but for now, this was right. God bless, ben
Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/messages.ez?ForumID=12356&Form.ShowMessage=683662
FYI: Imagination Works has posted a response on the issue.I'd rather stay in my lane than lay in my stain!
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
I'd rather stay in my lane than lay in my stain!