I was just wondering if someone could post a torso length shot of one of the super eyes liike Cake1's next to the same shot with the normal eyesof Michael or Vickie or something. Was curious about them but don't have much need for them hyper close like most people show them but I would be interested in seeing if there is a huge difference from a little bit further back. Thanks

Here is Mike eyes. Torso shot. Original image 451 x 469 - head cut and pasted into one compositie image. Simple no frill render. Mike 2 head texture and blue eyes. Lynn

Rerendered closer to camera - head shot. Lynn

Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=163533&Start=13&Artist=queri&ByArtist=Yes

Awful eyes dont' show off too well in that close up here's another shot that ilustrates their potential-- however, since there are more textures for the Real Eyes, they might be the better bargain for you. I don't render without one or the other. All right, I did render Bliss and Morris's Angel without Real Eyes and it was ok, but Mike really suffers. Both sets of eyes interact with light beautifully. Emily

Thanks for the shots .. Will have to see about those. Thanks again

I use Aweful Eyes for everything, no matter how close or far away the shot is going to be. Even further away they seem more lifelike and real. I'm in the process of converting all of my eye tex's to Aweful Eyes actually. :) There is an image of a close up in my gallery. (The Girl Within, is the name of it) if you want to take a look. It has both the real and mecha eyes in it.

Pardon my old eyes, but I always want a *big* image if I want to see something. I only have the Real Eyes, so I can't give a comparison.

I have Real-Eyes only and can't give a comparison either but I know that they are the best purchase I've made yet...they make the regular eyes that come with poser seem...sub-standard now :)