Forum Moderators: Staff
Poser Technical F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 02 8:21 pm)
Welcome to the Poser Technical Forum.
Where computer nerds can Pull out their slide rules and not get laughed at. Pocket protectors are not required. ;-)
This is the place you come to ask questions and share new ideas about using the internal file structure of Poser to push the program past it's normal limits.
New users are encouraged to read the FAQ sections here and on the Poser forum before asking questions.
I only have a partial answer, but Win98 will only allow any one program to access 128 meg of RAM so the extra 64 meg of RAM you're getting on the slower machine is part of the difference.
View Ajax's Gallery - View
Ajax's Freestuff - View
Ajax's Store -
Send Ajax a message
Yep, it's the case alright. There's quite a lot of doco around on it, though I couldn't point you to any. One of the DAZ tech tips mentions it I think. It has something to do with the win9x kernel. I use a dual boot. I would just go to Win2k but I can't find the right drivers for my modem and soundcard (It would help a lot if I knew what modem and soundcard I actually have).
View Ajax's Gallery - View
Ajax's Freestuff - View
Ajax's Store -
Send Ajax a message
Nah, I have a custom built thing. I know they gave me the boxes for all of the parts when I got it made, but if I kept the boxes then I don't know where I put them. The shop could probably tell me what they used, but it was a year and a half ago so they may not remember. All the same, I should check it out sometime.
View Ajax's Gallery - View
Ajax's Freestuff - View
Ajax's Store -
Send Ajax a message
Hey all, Ryan from DAZ Tech here. Here's the quote from the techtips, plus it's been updated with a workaround for those that don't want to upgrade. Good ol' Windoze. A problem does arise for those users with Win 98 or ME. The kernel that these programs use will not allocate the needed memory in one block for poser to render. This is especially a problem with large files like high resolution maps and or high resolution geometries. So even if you have 512mb of RAM, if you are running on either of these operating systems it is like running on 128mb of RAM as far as Poser is concerned. Besides upgrading your system to an NT kernel such as Win2K,or XP, we are still looking for reliable fixes. One solution that has worked for our customers is a memory utility called Cacheman by Outer Technologies which will allow you to configure your machine. You can download Cacheman here, they ask for a $10 registration fee on the honor system. Be nice, support independent developers! http://www.outertech.com/product.php?product=3&PHPSESSID=1a926c8fdb8ab6745b23d1db28f9777b I run ME at home on 256Megs, I've been playing around with Cacheman this weekend and it seems to help a lot. Anywhoo, drop me a line if you've got any more questions. tech@daz3d.com
Hi Rayan, I have Cacheman too because i know this german guy thomas reiman . well i didn't install cacheman anymore because i didn't use poser at this time and nothing brought down my memory. I'm running win ME and I have 784 MB ram but if I use poser it goes down to 0 if i'm rendering. now the new version looks different and I guess there must be a better cache settings like the older version 3.80. did you figured out yet how i change this in the best way. I really appreciate you tech help :)) Thanks alot for this :)) Marcabros
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Hope someone can answer this...I have these 2 PC's, and one is faster than the other when working in Poser. WAAAY faster... Why is my Pentium II 350mhz (running Windows 2000) with only 192MB of RAM at least TWICE as fast as my AMD K6-2 500Mhz system (running Win98 SE) with 256MB of RAM? I don't get it... the AMD even has a faster system bus (200Mhz as opposed to the Pentium's 100Mhz). Is it the OS? That's the only thing I can think of. Both hard drives are 7200rpm and relatively clutter-free, and constantly defragged/optimized. This is bugging me to no end - especially since I paid for the AMD and got the 350 for free. Thanks for any clues to solving this mystery!