Fri, Nov 22, 6:43 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Poser - OFFICIAL

All Forums

Welcome to the Poser - OFFICIAL Forum

Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom

Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 21 6:06 am)

Poser Gallery - Poser Freestuff

Subject: A non-dragon post NOT about the Millennium dragon!

maclean opened this issue on Sep 08, 2002 · 13 posts
Back to Forum Print
maclean ( ) posted Sun, 08 September 2002 at 2:59 PM · edited Fri, 22 November 2024 at 6:41 AM

c1rcle ( ) posted Sun, 08 September 2002 at 3:17 PM

Dragon Smiles Maclean Runs munch munch lol no-one takes you seriously :) Rob

Little_Dragon ( ) posted Sun, 08 September 2002 at 3:25 PM

You misspelled o****m. And define "normal".


David_Amos ( ) posted Sun, 08 September 2002 at 4:42 PM

could be worse, we could be talking about the cricket David

Jackson ( ) posted Sun, 08 September 2002 at 7:30 PM

Dragons non-existent? Didn't they just have a big convention somewhere?

Khai-J-Bach ( ) posted Sun, 08 September 2002 at 7:32 PM

what back to semi naked vicky's everywhere? hell no.. gimme a more interesting challenge.. like getting a decent firebreath effect.... Kai


melanie ( ) posted Sun, 08 September 2002 at 9:03 PM

Attached Link: Real Dragons?

Believe it or not, dragons may really have existed. Or at least what the people of those times *thought* were dragons. Here's a link to an interesting essay about the possibility that pterosaurs may have lived as late as the 17th century. Dragons are mentioned in the article. Melanie

bikermouse ( ) posted Sun, 08 September 2002 at 10:49 PM

But Melanie Dragon exist now - Why else would Peter, Paul and Mary have sung about them?

bikermouse ( ) posted Sun, 08 September 2002 at 10:50 PM

oops Dragons not Dragon

Little_Dragon ( ) posted Mon, 09 September 2002 at 12:26 AM

Whew! I was worried that the essay might have mentioned that embarrassing incident in France. Had there been any cameras in the vicinity at the time, I would never have lived it down.


bikermouse ( ) posted Mon, 09 September 2002 at 12:37 AM

L.D., The Knights Templar have been keeping your secret safe. You need not worry. - TJ

Little_Dragon ( ) posted Mon, 09 September 2002 at 1:54 AM

Ah. That would explain why the Illustrated London News got most of the facts wrong. I'd always assumed they had merely downplayed the story to make it seem more plausible.


bikermouse ( ) posted Mon, 09 September 2002 at 2:03 AM

Sie Lung, That was more a lack of their knowledge of 'Jeet Kune Do' than anything else. The principles apply to newspaper reporting as well as to martial arts. - TJ

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.