bookmark

Attached Link: http://www.tigerdirect.com

I've decided that using the chamfer works good enough and dosn't add too many more polys... I had thought about grouping like kirwyn stated however I don't feel it would give me the flexability that I want. I hadn't thought about triple'ing the polys however after using the chamfer I like the output better anyway. Thanks to all, --Naylin

UV Mapper showed absolutely no problems with the mesh. I had thought about that before I even posted here. --Naylin

Ok, I don't know if this is an appropriate way to fix this problem, but I did fix it by applying a very tiny (.005) chamfer to the edges around the sole of the shoe. Would you guys think that this is a good fix, or should I have tried some other way? --Naylin

Taking that what your saying into account because that is exactly where the two groups come together (foot and toe) I messed with the groups a bit and I continue to have the same problem no matter where I place the group. No matter where the groups come together I get that funky problem on the conforming version. Tis weird! --Naylin

Several of the above AND what about an align function??? --Naylin

Ok, I see all your points, now another question... When does it become non-violent? What if the stabbed man were a skeleton with a sword sticking out of its gullet?

--Naylin

Message edited on: 05/24/2005 11:18

Thank you very much Karen. Your explaination definately helps. And thanks for the quick response. --Naylin

" Orio, all the works of art listed are in places such as museums or churches.

They are not in our homes unless via internet..." -Luminaa

Just as a quick comment to this:

http://www.talariaenterprises.com/product_lists/renaissance_2.html

Here you can purchase an 11" high duplicate of Donatello's David for $98 and an 18.5" version for $227... And I'm sure that there are many more places to find such works. Hmmm... how much did you pay for Poser? $98 doesn't seem all that unresonable to me to have a piece of art in my home. Oh, and this is not meant to be a personal slam of any kind. Just a correction.

BTW: Thanks for the clarification on shirtless boys and diapered babies.

--Naylin Edit: You can also get a life-sized version of Michelangelo's David for $2310. While this is a bit pricey for me, I'm sure someone has it in their home, or office!

Message edited on: 03/22/2005 14:48

All I can think of is what I would have thought when I was 14 mowing the lawn with no shirt on if my mother had come running out of the house screaming "Put a shirt on! Some pervert might be watching you!" OR: I was at the beach and was the only boy there that was made to wear a shirt! Just my 2 cents. --Naylin

Image on the left just plain white BG... On the right just dropped in a BG... No other work done at all. There is a slight halo on the hair a little bit, but not bad.

--Naylin