2 threads found!
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Reply |
---|---|---|---|---|
BrendaJa | 16 | 393 | ||
BrendaJa | 28 | 532 |
12 comments found!
Too late to edit my post, but in fact, the boxes on the right should be darker, at least if you see how I do.
I made my own White's illusion. It's the same as in the article, only squeezed down. Squeezing the boxes down exaggerates the effect (see if they still look the same to you), and stretching them bigger will decrease the effect of the illusion.
Thread: What's the big deal with gamma correction? | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Quote - > Quote -
If you are interested, take a look at this fascinating -certainly in the context of this discussion- article from a few years ago, the "White's Illusion" that plagues the human brain can also occur in "any system that tries to emulate human vision." (quote from the article, emphasis mine)
So what does it say about me that "White's Illusion" looks like two equally grey boxes to me. I have to really do some concentrating to get the one on the left to look darker.
The first paragraph says "Like most people, you should see one block of grey as darker than the other," it just means you're not like most people, as far as your vision goes, your vision is more accurate the the physical world than most people's. Everybody is different one way or another, and even people with very "correct" vision will sense colors slightly differently from each other.
Thread: What's the big deal with gamma correction? | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Quote - > Quote - Interesting. Are we trying to emulate the camera lens, or human vision? Would they be the same?
You cant Emulate human vision... its impossible.
Actually so called
photorealistic 3Drenderers are just Emulation what the scene would look like if a professional photographer took a picture and handed it to you
if you use a truly "highend"
render engine that used a "physicaly correct" workflow you can recognize this right away in your settings ( see pic)
but these of course are way more $$Expensive$$$ than poser
I think that is an interesting question that deserves a more accurate answer. Much of The Renaissance was about artists recreating what they actually saw on paper and canvas rather than caricatured and stereotypical shapes previous generations used.
Take a look a Durer's perspective device, the second image down. You can see how artists in the days of the old masters were taught perspective and foreshortening. This method is still used to teach art students today, though using clear plexiglass plates rather than a bulky table.
Actually, take a look at some old master paintings and how good they were at capturing realistic behaving light and shadow. They had many of the techniques of photorealism down centuries before photography was invented! In fact, to this day, photography owes more to painting (which is also the style of much 3D art) than vice versa.
If you are interested, take a look at this fascinating -certainly in the context of this discussion- article from a few years ago, the "White's Illusion" that plagues the human brain can also occur in "any system that tries to emulate human vision." (quote from the article, emphasis mine)
In fact the camera is a machine that emulates human vision.
But for the original question, no a camera and human vision are not the same. 3D software imitates a real world lens with many of the same controls, but not the human eye. Generally speaking artists try to capture a mix of what they see and imagine on their medium, and of course there are extremes in either direction.
Thread: Who Mourns Apollo? | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
I'm curious... I've read a fair amount about Apollo Maximus with a lot of people swearing by the figure. I've used it a bit but to me it doesn't seem any better than a lot of the other figures already out there. Is there something I'm missing that makes AM superior to other human poser models?
Thread: Blood elf animated in poser | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Thread: Who Mourns Apollo? | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Quote -
**
FREE** DAZ M3
FREE DAZ "Freak4"and the venerable Mike2
Not Free but was Selling for $70 USD
when Apollo was first released at $90 USD.
just setting the facts straight.Cheers
Actually, anyone interested can get Michael 2 here for free.
And the reduced resolution version is here, also for free.
Just setting the facts... even straighter! roflmao! :lol: :lol: :lol:
Thread: My first upload! | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Attached Link: Tea Party
Hey guys, I wanted to thank everybody for their comments, they've been very interesting, and encouraging!I would have replied sooner but I wanted to show you my next picture first. Its a redoing of my first upload, taking some of the comments I received into account.
Ok, I'll try not to be too much of an attention who - are (guilty as charged! roflmao) and spam up the forums every time I update my gallery, but I was excited to show this. :biggrin:
Thread: My first upload! | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Hmm, I seem to be getting mixed reactions here.
I wanted to do a longer series with these characters, like a short story, now I'm not so sure. :unsure:
Thread: My first upload! | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Hi guys! Thanks for all the comments and advice.
For you guys that think the bear looks weird you'll have to blame 3D Universe for that since they made the model. lol
I just threw him in the scene and pressed 'render.' roflmao
I think he just looks adorable! rofl :lol:
Thread: Hi Renderosity, its Brenda! | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Quote - Welcome Brenda
I also tried escaping for a few years- but I came back.
I also had a bit of an over budget with my Daz purchases- when I returned.
Look around and you will find some great free-stuff
And DPHoadley will tell you that all you need are the P4 Posette and the dude (known affectionately as the "Dork".)
You mean the models from old versions of poser? I don't think that there is a way to make them look like cartoon animals or little children, which is what I like to do. roflmao
Actually those older models look downright ugly compared to the newer ones. roflmao :lol:
Thread: Hi Renderosity, its Brenda! | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Quote - oh noooooooooooooooooooooo
a cutesy loverYou should go quickly over to RDNA and check all the cutesy stuff they have :)
Ohh you're right, they have a lot of good stuff, I just wishlisted a ton of things! rofl! :lol:
Too bad for rdna I already spent this month's hobby budget at Daz! lmao!
The rdna models look nice, but I really like the models that 3D Universe makes. I think 3D Universe is awesome IMVHO! roflmao! :lol:
Thread: Hi Renderosity, its Brenda! | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Wow! I feel so welcome! :biggrin:
I was going to reply to everyone individually but there were too many! lmao! I thought that I might only get a few replies! lol Well thanks everyone for your warm welcome.
I actually got the kids and some other adorable things they recently had at daz because I like cute things. lmao :lol:
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Thread: What's the big deal with gamma correction? | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL