Renderosity Forums
Search Results: Threads
47 threads found!
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| gammaRascal | 17 | 261 | ||
| gammaRascal | 4 | 320 | ||
| gammaRascal | 4 | 2003 | ||
| gammaRascal | 3 | 99 | ||
| gammaRascal | 0 | 70 |
(none)
|
|
| gammaRascal | 10 | 950 | ||
| gammaRascal | 10 | 231 | ||
| gammaRascal | 6 | 56 | ||
| gammaRascal | 7 | 44 | ||
| gammaRascal | 2 | 65 | ||
| gammaRascal | 3 | 76 | ||
| gammaRascal | 8 | 121 | ||
| gammaRascal | 5 | 97 | ||
| gammaRascal | 5 | 90 | ||
| gammaRascal | 3 | 126 |
Search Results: Comments
471 comments found!
I'd love to enter but there is no way in hell I'd hand over all rights to my work unless it was paid for. At least as far as the rules above are concerned.
So if nobody wins [which will likely be the case] they can still use any entry because they wrote the rules to basically allow them to do that.
It's no wonder the entries are lacking.
However, the rules on that actual page state: The copyright of all slogans will remain with their creators. However, the creator of the winning slogan and the runners-up grant worldwide royalty-free perpetual rights to WishFree.com to use their slogans in any desired way.
Which I'm not sure even applies as a Logo is not a Slogan and they aren't interchangeable terms.
And there is no deadline... is the contest running forever?
Thread: wow, this render in the gallery is inspiring, like poww | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=e0f7bbff88b8f07ce3d037ed6d6d3d353d8ac7f7.402748
All the fur and hair is postwork. Whether the fur is derived from another image or not, probably.
Thread: People Commenting About My Pictures Bring Too Dark | Forum: Bryce
I calibrate using this but I don't think this is a calibration issue. If ones monitor is too dark, one would over compensate for the highs and the final image could be viewed as being too bright with no dark tones while an image that is created on a monitor that is too bright might be seemingly too dark because the creator over compensated for the lows.
This is more about tonal range and lighting [like orbital suggests]. Of the images I would define as having very little tonal range [or dynamic range] they are the ones that are 'too dark'. It's not so much that they are 'too dark’ - more to the point - it's that they have no tonal range or key lights. They are seemingly stuck between the white point and black point making them very flat [erring closer to the black end]
Thread: User Name Change Request | Forum: Community Center
Thread: User Name Change Request | Forum: Community Center
Thread: User Name Change Request | Forum: Community Center
Thread: User Name Change Request | Forum: Community Center
Turns out, one has to buy a username change... ouch ):
http://www.renderosity.com/mod/bcs/member-username-change/51404
Thread: User Name Change Request | Forum: Community Center
Thread: User Name Change Request | Forum: Community Center
Well mainly because if you search for Twisted_Symmetry, you get nothing - if you search for gammaRascal, you get everything.
I'd like to connect this rendo profile with my online reputation so if/when someone searches my username, this profile would be included.
Thread: User Name Change Request | Forum: Community Center
lol
For me it's really just about my online reputation. I don't use Twisted_Symmetry anywhere else. I have a different username and I was hoping I could get this one changed to reflect as much.
Thread: Optimizing textures without noticeable quality loss? | Forum: Photoshop
For JPG, you can definitely get good quality results with Save for Web at around as far down as about 55%. You just have to keep an eye on the details you want to preserve and adjust accordingly.
As far as PNG's go, with or without transparency, it makes little difference. Since there is no quality slider for PNG in Save for Web you can use a third party PNG option like SuperPNG. While it will probably have little effect at 4k with lots of color data [again, the trans is irrelevant] it can shave off a few megs as compared to a direct [default] PNG save or Save for Web PNG save.
SuperPNG really only shines when you want to use a lot of PNG's and they are small - it's the cumulative effect - at least that's been my experience.
Thread: How-to Videos Available for FaceAge Photoshop plugin | Forum: Photoshop
Thread: "Painting" in PS? | Forum: Photoshop
Photoshop CS5 has some new painting features if you want to download the trial and check them out.
Thread: Need help to create a chipped corner effect for walls | Forum: Photoshop
Thread: Adding A Smile | Forum: Photoshop
Looks a little small'ish to me. Plus the smile is straight-on while the face is angled - you have to compensate for that by distorting/warping the smile.
You tweaked the nose, ya? I think you pulled too much from the tip making the nose look like a fat nose rather than just pulling the nostrils - to give the impression that the cheeks are pulling on the nostrils.
Maybe others would have a different opinion, but that's how I did mine (which is still subjectively good/bad)
Privacy Notice
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Thread: $200 Logo Design Contest | Forum: Photoshop