Sat, Nov 9, 11:59 PM CST

Renderosity Forums / Poser - OFFICIAL



Welcome to the Poser - OFFICIAL Forum

Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom

Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 09 11:21 pm)



Subject: THE GREAT Poser 5 CPU Test!!!


  • 1
  • 2
Jim Burton ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 1:02 PM · edited Sat, 09 November 2024 at 11:57 PM

Attached Link: http://digitaldreams.bbay.com/cputest_p5.zip

file_73416.jpg

O.K., here we go, download the Zip, read the instructions, open the PZ3 in Poser 5 and run it. Just stock P5 stuff in there (Judy and Don made the file too big, I had to use the Posette, BTW) NO CHEATING! The purpose of this is to compare various computer speeds in Poser 5, not to play one-ups-man-ship. Report your results to this thread, I'll tabulate every once in awile. To get it rolling: AMD 1.4Ghz 1GB RAM, Win2K 355 seconds


Jim Burton ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 1:04 PM

I don't jknow how slow BBay's server is going to get if 500 people hit download at the same time, if anybody wants to co-host the Zip fine, just post your link here.


kbennett ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 1:05 PM

You want me to put it in the back room? Kev.


Jim Burton ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 1:26 PM

Sure, only what is the back room? ;-)


Jim Burton ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 1:30 PM

file_73417.jpg

Here is what it actually looks like, BTW, with the Posette and the Dork, I did squeeze P5 hair in, though, file is about 600K.


steveshanks ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 1:35 PM

P4 2.8ghz -512mb ram -WinXPhome -253 secs......Steve


kbennett ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 1:36 PM

The Poser Backroom here at Rendie ;) (Link) Anyway, here's the link to the test file. :) Kev.


Jim Burton ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 1:36 PM

Thanks Kev, super!


notefinger ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 1:56 PM

How do you get the time? Does Poser give you the time to render?


steveshanks ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 2:05 PM

Just time it with your watch :o)...Ctrl-R till the render finishes...Steve


Tashar59 ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 2:23 PM

AMD 2.4Ghz 768Mb RAM WinXPhome 264 sec.


Farside ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 2:45 PM

Pentium 4 1.4 - 1GB RDRAM - WinXP - 160GB HD 396 seconds total P5 adding objects, preparing to render: 211 seconds actual render of picture: 185 seconds


compiler ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 2:58 PM

250 seconds. Poser 5 SR3. Pentium 4 at 2,4 GHz. Win XP Pro. 1 Gb RAM, 61.4 GB free on the HD Poser is installed on (120 GB in total on this HD which is not my system HD). It took quite some time to open the pz3, though...


Dagon ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 3:16 PM

P4 3.0 GHz. 2Gb RAM . XPhome. 211 seconds


Jim Burton ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 3:20 PM

I got my new computer fired up just for this, here is the first tabulation, it heads the list so far, Gee!: P4 2.8Ghz (3.09) - 1GB Ram Win2K 209 Sec. Pentium 4 2.4 GHz. 1GB Ram Win XP Pro 250 Sec P4 2.8ghz -512mb ram -WinXPhome -253 secs AMD 2.4Ghz 768Mb RAM WinXPhome 264 sec AMD 1.4Ghz 1GB RAM, Win2K 355 seconds P4 1.4 - 1GB RDRAM - WinXP 396 seconds Looks like AMD's aren't going to run away with this one, like they did with the Poser 4 version. Oh, make sure you have service pack 3 installed too, I neglected to mention that, but it puts everybody on an equal footing. Let's see some Mac results too, they just got Poser 5, right?


udgang99 ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 3:26 PM

AMD 1,67 Ghz - 256 Mb RAM - WinXP home - 600 sec (exactly 10 minuts!)


Jim Burton ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 3:36 PM

Yeah, it looks like we don't need a stopwatch with 1/10 seconds to keep track of the results, we could almost use a sundial!


amcgregor ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 3:37 PM

P4 2.4 Ghz - 1 GHz Ram - Win XP Home - 236 Seconds


bip77 ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 3:49 PM

AMD-XP 1,8 GHz 512 Mb RAM Win2K-Pro 308 sec


KarenJ ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 4:18 PM

Athlon XP 2.4ghz, 1gb DDR RAM, Win XP Home - 242 secs


"you are terrifying
and strange and beautiful
something not everyone knows how to love." - Warsan Shire


Caly ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 4:24 PM

Yes, Poser 5 just came out for the Mac... This Mac user has not bought Poser 5. I don't know that many have. You could try a crosspost to the Mac forum. :)

Calypso Dreams... My Art- http://www.calypso-dreams.com

Renderosity Gallery


kuroyume0161 ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 4:25 PM

Pentium Xeon 2x2.66GHz 2GB Ram WinXP Pro - 209 seconds (Obviously, one of the processors was idle during the render) :)

C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg off.

 -- Bjarne Stroustrup

Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone


JohnF1964 ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 5:31 PM

p4 2.4 gh, 1.5 gb ddr ram, win xp home, 258 seconds


wdupre ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 5:33 PM

P4 2.53 win xp home 1 gig ram 237sec (259 with IE and aim open) btw bumping the bucket size up to 128 shaves it down to 212 seconds



JVRenderer ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 5:47 PM

Here's what I got: I rendered 3 times on each system. System 1: (desktop) AMD XP2800+, 1 GB PC3200 DDR Mem, Windows 2000 Pro. test 1: 192 sec, test 2: 187 sec, test 3: 195 sec. System 2: (Notebook) Intel Pentium IV 3.06 GHz, 1 GB PC2700 DDR Mem, Windows 2000 Pro. test 1: 211 sec, test 2: 217 sec, test 3: 214 sec. other variables may affect the scores: - I allocated 64 MB of the memory on the AMD to the onboard video. - The video on the notebook has it's own 64 MB of memory. - The HD on the desktop(AMD) is a ATA 133 7200 RPM drive - The HD on the notebook(intel) is a ATA 100 5400 RPM drive I hope this is helpful. JV :D





Software: Daz Studio 4.15,  Photoshop CC, Zbrush 2022, Blender 3.3, Silo 2.3, Filter Forge 4. Marvelous Designer 7

Hardware: self built Intel Core i7 8086K, 64GB RAM,  RTX 3090 .

"If you spend too much time arguing about software, you're spending too little time creating art!" ~ SomeSmartAss

"A critic is a legless man who teaches running." ~ Channing Pollock


My Gallery  My Other Gallery 




DominiqueB ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 7:18 PM

rendered 3 times averaged out at 199 seconds Intel Pentium 4 3Ghz,800Mhz Front Side Bus , 512K on-die L2 cache. 2GB dual channel DDR SDRAM at 400MHz Windows XP professionnal

Dominique Digital Cats Media


randym77 ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 7:30 PM

Pentium 4, 2.8Ghz, 1.5 Gb DDR-SDRAM, XP Home, 218 seconds


rw2psr ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 7:37 PM

AMD 1.4 ghz, 1 GIG pc133 mem, win 2000 pro, 305 sec


Jim Burton ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 7:41 PM

P= Pentium NB= Notebook (time) = overclocked CPU speed, Poser 5 SR3 render times AMD XP2800+ 1 GB RAM Windows 2000 Pro 192 sec P4 3Ghz 2GB RAM WinXP Pro 199 Seconds P4 2.8Ghz (3.09) - 1GB Ram Win2K 209 Sec. P Xeon 2x2.66GHz 2GB Ram WinXP Pro - 209 seconds P4 NB 3.06 GHz 1 GB RAM Windows 2000 Pro 211 sec P4 2.8Ghz 1.5 Gb RAM XP Home 218 seconds AMD 1.4 ghz 1 gb win 2000 pro 234 sec P4 2.4 Ghz 1 GHz Ram Win XP Home 236 Seconds P4 2.53 Ghz 1 GB RAM win xp home 237sec Athlon XP 2.4ghz 1gb RAM Win XP Home 242 secs P4 2.4 GHz. 1GB Ram Win XP Pro 250 Sec P4 2.8ghz -512mb ram -WinXPhome -253 secs p4 2.4 gh, 1.5 gb ram win xp home 258 seconds AMD 2.4Ghz 768Mb RAM WinXPhome 264 sec AMD 1.4 ghz 1 GB Ram win 2000 pro 305 sec AMD-XP 1.8 GHz 512 Mb RAM Win2K-Pro 308 sec AMD 1.4Ghz 1GB RAM, Win2K 355 seconds P4 1.4 - 1GB RDRAM - WinXP 396 seconds AMD 1.67 Ghz 256 Mb RAM WinXP home 600 sec


dan whiteside ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 7:56 PM

Mac /G4 /1.4 GHz DP/1Gig RAM/OS10.2.6: 543 sec. Ouch! Thanks Jim, I was wondering how Mac P5 compared to the PC. Best; Dan


lalverson ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 8:10 PM

P4 2.20G 256 RAM WinXPHome 620 seconds


milamber42 ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 8:16 PM

Rearranging the stats so far by processor and memory: AMD 1.4 ghz 1 gb win 2000 pro 234 sec AMD 1.4 ghz 1 GB Ram win 2000 pro 305 sec AMD 1.4Ghz 1GB RAM, Win2K 355 seconds AMD 1.67 Ghz 256 Mb RAM WinXP home 600 sec AMD-XP 1.8 GHz 512 Mb RAM Win2K-Pro 308 sec AMD 2.4Ghz 768Mb RAM WinXPhome 264 sec Athlon XP 2.4ghz 1gb RAM Win XP Home 242 secs AMD XP2800+ 1 GB RAM Windows 2000 Pro 192 sec [??] P4 1.4 - 1GB RDRAM - WinXP 396 seconds P4 2.20G 256 RAM WinXPHome 620 seconds P4 2.4 GHz. 1GB Ram Win XP Pro 250 Sec P4 2.4 Ghz 1 GHz Ram Win XP Home 236 Seconds p4 2.4 gh, 1.5 gb ram win xp home 258 seconds P4 2.53 Ghz 1 GB RAM win xp home 237sec P4 2.8ghz -512mb ram -WinXPhome -253 secs P4 2.8Ghz 1.5 Gb RAM XP Home 218 seconds P4 NB 3.06 GHz 1 GB RAM Windows 2000 Pro 211 sec P4 3Ghz 2GB RAM WinXP Pro 199 Seconds P4 2.8Ghz (3.09) - 1GB Ram Win2K 209 Sec. P Xeon 2x2.66GHz 2GB Ram WinXP Pro - 209 seconds Take a look at the P2.4 Ghz stats. Looks like there are some other contributing factors besides memory and processor speed. Interesting and very timely Jim. It will help me decide what P4 processor to buy. :)


EricofSD ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 8:48 PM

I must be timing it wrong. I did not count the time for the setup, like loading texture maps, etc. I just timed it from when the image render box opened to when it closed. AMD 2.1g 1g ram (ddr) win2k sp4 193 seconds. If I include the time it takes to set it up, ie, the small render box that opens when you first hit ctr R, then its 266 seconds.


Little_Dragon ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 9:08 PM

Oh, bloody hell. The rest of you think you have it bad?

AMD Athlon XP 2000+, 512MB RAM, Win98FE -- 865 seconds

That's it, I'm installing WinXP ...

... although increasing the bucket size to 128 brought my time down to 210 seconds. I never realized before, but that also speeds up shadow-map calculations. Which makes sense when I think about what that involves.



Dave-So ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 9:16 PM

AMD XP 1800+(1.53ghz)/512meg Ram/WinXP Home---337seconds

Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it.
Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together.
All things connect......Chief Seattle, 1854



ringbearer ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 9:25 PM

Here's a real dog.... P3,733,512 ram,WIN98SE-1411 seconds (23 min 31 sec)ouch!!

There are a lot of things worse than dying, being afraid all the time would be one.

My Gallery


Netherworks ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 9:29 PM

Pentium 4 3.06GHz, 1 GB RAM, Windows 2000 Pro SP-4, 169 seconds This is an average done with 3 renderings.

.


hsimonse ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 9:57 PM

AMD XP2000 512 Mb RAM, Win 2Kpro --- 259 secs


shelly ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 10:08 PM

AMD 2.5 (Barton) 1gig Dual Channel nForce MB XP/Pro 241 sec


Kevschmev ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 10:12 PM

Possibly the lowest spec so far..... Pentium 3 500mhz 640mb ram Win2K 394 seconds Not bad really!


depakotez ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 10:28 PM

P4 1.9 Ghz 1.5 Gb Ram 310 Seconds.


Tashar59 ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 10:36 PM

So can someone explain bucket size to this computer layman. Maybe a new thread so as not to interfere with this one.


Jim Burton ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 10:40 PM

The time should be total, incidently, that is from when you click "Render" (or CTR-R) and until the "Rendering.." box goes away. Netherworks, is that how you did it? Your time seems pretty fast. ;-)


Netherworks ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 10:58 PM

Jim, that's the time from hitting Ctrl-R to the end - I explicitly followed your instructions in the readme ;) Marks: Render 1- 9:11:00 to 9:13:44 - 164 seconds Render 2- 9:21:00 to 9:23:52 - 172 seconds Render 3- 9:25:00 to 9:27:50 - 170 seconds Average, rounding up: 169 seconds doing it one more time to be absolutely sure: Render started 10:52:00 (hit ctrl-R). At 10:52:52, it finished shadow map calculations and so forth and actually starting the rendering. At 10:54:52 render completed and the progress box disappeared. That's 172 seconds.

.


Netherworks ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 11:16 PM

Attached Link: http://www.keindesign.de/stefan/poser/renderer.html

beryld, Stefan's site at the link posted explains all of the firefly options. A wealth of knowledge there.

.


nakamuram ( ) posted Tue, 26 August 2003 at 11:34 PM

Using your second "Mohawk" version, I get a render time of 192secs. Shadow maps and adding objects takes approx the first 60 secs -- consistent with Netherworks' observations. Increasing the bucket size to 256 decreases the render time to 163secs. System specs -- P4 2.8Ghz 800Mhz FSB, 1Gb RAM, Abit IS-7 Motherboard, WinXP Pro, no overclock.


layingback ( ) posted Wed, 27 August 2003 at 12:12 AM

AMD 1.1GHz 1GB Ram Win2K 366 seconds (bucket size left at default) It's a 1GHz overclocked to 1.1, 100 bus overclocked to 133, SDRAM. There is clearly variation on AMD Win2K systems too. I'm one of those who's abandoned Loser5 due to its speed (across the baord not just rendering which I'd expected would be slow). I'd conjected that memory bus speeds might be significant, after all Poser hammers the memory subsystem something wild. Do those people with slower times than others with same CPU/amount of memory/OS also have slower memory? BTW, milamber has the right idea splitting AMD and P4 out separately. Intel P4 GHz'ises are weaklings compared with those of PIII and AMD. Matrox has done much analysis for their new digital video line, and rate a P4 1.8GHz as equvalent to a PIII 1GHz for pure CPU rendering times. So a 1 = 1.5 ratio of P4 to AMD GHz #'s seems reasonable (note that's AMD GHz not to be confused with their chip numbers - don't you love Prod Mktg guys ... ;-) lb


igohigh ( ) posted Wed, 27 August 2003 at 1:43 AM

System: Dell Dimension XPS T600r CPU: PIII 850 RAM: 512 Meg Win98SE (all SPs) Time: 769 sec. No overclocking, nothing running in BG...well, an extrnal DVD player showing LOTR's Two Towers. we must go now, we must leave! we can hear my Precious calling! we have no friends here! Coming my Precioussss coming!!


Spanki ( ) posted Wed, 27 August 2003 at 1:57 AM

P3 500mhz clocked to 933mhz, 512mb ram, XPHome - 480 sec. (8 minutes) Bucket size increased to 128 - 405 sec. (6 min. 45 sec.) Sad. ;)

Cinema4D Plugins (Home of Riptide, Riptide Pro, Undertow, Morph Mill, KyamaSlide and I/Ogre plugins) Poser products Freelance Modelling, Poser Rigging, UV-mapping work for hire.


lucstef ( ) posted Wed, 27 August 2003 at 2:58 AM

AMD 1700+, its clock speed (no OC) is 1467 Mhz, 1 gig RAM, 278 sec with Opera and other tasks active.
When I have time I'll rerun it without other tasks active, no Zone Alarm, no internet connections and so on, and I'll repost my times (and I think we all have to do this).

Now some thoughts.

As far as I can see, the main speedup is the RAM, not the CPU (if you don't compare an AMD 1400 to a P4 3.06, obviusly...); from 2.0 Mhz up, rendertime with 1 or 2 gig RAM is consistent with minimal variations compared to the variations of the CPU speed.
Additionally, RDRAM isn't a greater speedup in respect to traditional DDR RAM, even if only one tester stated he had RDRAM (and he got one of the worst times in the 1.4 Mhz class...).
This means: if you can buy a P4 or a AMD 2.4 or 2.6 that costs 100 $, buy it against a P4 3.06 that costs 300+ $ (even 500 $ here, around 480 euro), you aren't going to lose so much speed in comparation to the much less money spent...same goes for RAM, don't buy the much more expensive RDRAM and chipset which support it, it's only a marketing issue :-)

And for the professionals who use highend 3D apps? Well, it's another story: 3DSMax and Lightwave, only to talk about these two, take great advantage from the fastest FSB of the new P4s, and if you can afford a dual CPU system go for it, according to what I've read these apps run almost 1.5-1.8 times faster than traditional single CPU systems...
Poser uses only 1 CPU though, so don't run to the next store if you are going to render a simple NVIATWAS :-DDD

The MACs, sorry to say that, are great for other jobs, but NEVER GOT A MAC FOR 3D RENDERING!!!
I have evidences that the biggest and powerful MAC is outraged by a simple 1.8 Mhz Intel CPU, you can see some threads at http://www.cgtalk.com (search for "Cinebench"): I'm speaking of triple or quadruple (and even greater) scores for a average Intel based CPU against a powerful MAC...check for yourself.
Apple is launching the next G5 generation of CPU, and the testers are stating it can outrun even the 3.06 P4; but the price tag is going to outrun the one of the highend P4 systems, too...
Please don't take this as a war flame Intel/MAC, I'm only reporting what I've read about.

Ciao, Luca


lucstef ( ) posted Wed, 27 August 2003 at 3:02 AM

Ehr...my system is under Win2000 Pro :-) Ciao, Luca


  • 1
  • 2

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.