Mon, Dec 23, 6:29 PM CST

Renderosity Forums / Carrara



Welcome to the Carrara Forum

Forum Coordinators: Kalypso

Carrara F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Dec 21 9:55 pm)

 

Visit the Carrara Gallery here.

Carrara Free Stuff here.

 
Visit the Renderosity MarketPlace - Your source for digital art content!
 

 



Subject: How dose Pixels 3D compare to Carrara?


Pinklet ( ) posted Thu, 14 November 2002 at 1:48 PM · edited Fri, 02 August 2024 at 8:16 PM

I just read a story in Mac Central about this App and I was just wondering if someone here had used it, and how dose it compare to Carrara. I have only used Ray Dram, Infini-D and Carrara for 3D but from the reviews I read on Pixels it seems to me that it might deserve a second look.


velarde ( ) posted Thu, 14 November 2002 at 5:00 PM

Good question..... I was wondering also, any comments? The down side is that its Mac only (not that it bothers me..) I guess if you are into Pro applications the new Cinema 4D is the way to go... Of course if you are mostly hobbies or don't need any of the pro features (and prices...) I'll stick with Carrara.


willf ( ) posted Thu, 14 November 2002 at 11:16 PM

Pixels.net was giving away the full version 3.6 (&maybe 3.7) awhile ago, they were in the "downloads" section. I played around with V3.6 on a G3(400mgz) for several hours & was quite impressed with the Nurbs modeler. It allows for much more control then does the Carrara Mesh or Spline room tools. Pixels also has a SculptBrush (ala Amorphium) and it has an interesting image "WarpMesh" that can be accomplished somewhat within Carrara with Erics' AnythingGrooves plug plug-in. The shaders appear to be on par with Carrara, although both can be so complex that it's hard to tell. The boolean operations also seem to work better in Pixels and there appears to be more control & options for animations (especially with the available plug-ins). I also like the UI better as it's more flexible & doesn't hog the desktop. That being said, Pixels 3.6 (don't know about V4.1) didn't like playing with larger obj files from Poser. Carrara is much better at manipulating existing models that can be found all across the net. Also, there is a larger user base & available resources for Carrara. Eovia has demonstrated that they are committed to OSX & the Mac OS (they don't play games like Metacreations did & CuriousLabs does). You also get the Amapi modeler with Carrara which many say is a very powerful modeler if you take the time to learn it. The other caveat is that you need to "purchase" additional add-ons for more powerful functionality (like ShaderMakerPro etc). These are only initial thoughts & I haven't really done too much with Pixels. I'd see if there were a demo available for the new version & take it for a long spin. P.S., I don't normally support programs that have copy-protection "schemes"


Pinklet ( ) posted Fri, 15 November 2002 at 9:54 AM

I am not sure but apparently they are including SaderMaker Pro with 4.1 but I could be mistaken. It looks from what you are saying that Pixels 3D does disserve a closer look although I am really comfortable in Carrara, but the price seems pretty good for what you get. Thanks for the info.


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.