Forum Moderators: Staff
Poser Technical F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Dec 04 2:47 am)
Welcome to the Poser Technical Forum.
Where computer nerds can Pull out their slide rules and not get laughed at. Pocket protectors are not required. ;-)
This is the place you come to ask questions and share new ideas about using the internal file structure of Poser to push the program past it's normal limits.
New users are encouraged to read the FAQ sections here and on the Poser forum before asking questions.
Yeah. Now I'm encountering problems with the gravity thing... wherein the JPs are acting really flaky with the point-at. I think I'm going to have to scratch the reversed polarity idea since this is done as a figure, not a floating prop. Instead I'll have to make an Anti-Gravity Well just the same but up in the sky at max distance. sigh
Or maybe not. I got one working but it's not making the Gravity Well visible in the menu, like you were having the problem with. The one I hacked out of a PZ3 is the one that's acting flaky, the one I hacked together first, though, seems to work fine. Except the fact that the gravity well is not visible anywhere at all even in the menu. I'm way confused.
Oh, weirdness. In the one where I didn't get it in the menu -- here's why... it wasn't there. I found the syntax error -- I closed the main block before I got to the doc{block which means it stopped reading. So the result was that it never loaded the Gravity Well. I was Pointing-At a nonexstient actor. But it was working. Som I'm a little bit weirded out by that...
Okay I just tried something really weird and it seems to be working... I removed the Gravity_Well prop entirely and it didn't work. That makes sense. Here's what doesn't... I then replaced the Gravity_Well declaration but didnt' add the prop at all. So the mostly empty declaration at the top was there (with only the geomResource and the storageOffset), and the other part where you set all the channels -- that isn't there. It's working, mostly. However, on y rotation of the handle at certain angles it forces the flame into an angle (and thus the two spotlights that are part of it). This is getting very strange. It's 'pointing-at' a prop that doesn't exist and has no parametres at all except what geometry to use and the storage offset. As a result, that prop that it's pointing at isn't there but it's pointing at it anyway. It's not only not there, but in not being there it's not able to be located in any place within the UNIVERSE either... but somehow the flame is pointing at it. I wonder if this would work just the same without the reversed endpoint and stuff (or better)
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.