Hi, I'm Andrea, and I'm interested in creatures and plants both wild and tamed, and people of all sorts. I only use a compact digital camera ,as I love being able to get it into a back pocket, and not have to cart heavy kit about. I carry a Panasonic Lumix TZ series, binoculars and a hand lens almost everywhere.Most of my outings are with the dogs so I only use point and shoot.
I am getting the hang of Photoshop, thanks to some very kind folk on RR!
I have a wildlife garden in Bournemouth, Dorset, in the UK, and spend a lot of time there . I retired from teaching art to teenagers a while ago.
I'm now getting some good results with my digi compacts; it took me a while to make the switch from my old film camera, an 1960 ish Pentax Spotmatic, but the mistakes are much cheaper!
I have 4 lodgers, 3 dogs and a parrot who, as at 2017, I have had 40 years.
I has so far had 19 dogs, mostly rescues.
Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Comments (16)
jayfar
Looks good to me !
Faemike55
I like the description Great capture
Adobe_One_Kenobi
Excellent I like that knited BG you used Andrea
kgb224
Superb capture Andrea. God bless.
emmecielle
Excellent shot! :)
jendellas
You have a lot of perfumes I have never heard of :o)
Katraz
An interesting shot,
goodoleboy
Great shot of the eau de toilet against that stellar patterned texture.
Mark-David-Rogers
You capture these perfume bottles so well, nicely presented and shot.
wysiwig
Two fantastic images but I prefer this one for its stripes on stripes design. I also love it when manufacturers give their products French names. Then they can charge twice as much for the product. Boeuf Bourguignon - $41 44 oz Beef Stew - $22 48 oz
jocko500
very good lighting on this
MrsRatbag
LOL! great description...I should think it would make it quite popular. Lovely work.
auntietk
I like the stripes you chose for this one, but prefer the light in the other. The description is great! :)
blondeblurr
I am always astounded to view another one from your fine collection, and one I have never seen before, that's quite a challenge on it's own ... but I prefer the 'flickr' version - because of the back-lighting, BB
anahata.c
You have two completely different treatments between here and flickr. The flickr has these standing proudly with beautiful nature behind it. It's proud and public, even though you've placed it in the shade...Here, it's all intimate and private, hugged by a fabric that echoes the stripes on the box. And it's enveloped, and you use filtering too, giving it grain and 'cells', etc. And this, here, shows more of your sensitivity to studio setup. I think most of the photographers here work outside studios, and probably do little of what you do, ie, placement, backdrop, lighting, combining with other objects, etc. People take that for granted until they finally do it: I've tried it many times---you've yet to see one result in my gallery---and I just can't get it. Which is why I so admire your work in those areas. Yours are always alive and attuned to the language of the objects you shoot. Painters could get around mediocre setups with infinite choices of hue, stroke, light, dark, etc. But the camera doesn't give that many options, so you really have to know what you're doing. This is very well set up and captured. And the cap stands in fine contrast to that bottle. And btw, a really descriptive description of the fragrance! I looked up Poison-Giorgio but didn't find anything I could recognize. And I love "a classic, slightly nonedescript, downmarket French chic...and comes in a pleasantly dowdy bottle". I can honestly say, "slightly nondescript downmarket French chic" is really creative description; and "a pleasantly dowdy bottle" is great. Not questioning that their description is accurate, just amazed at the literary fun they have in describing it.
danapommet
I would have to strongly go with the FlickR version. What a difference!