Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Feb 01 6:51 am)
Attached Link: http://www.myjanee.com/tuts/burn/burn.htm
What Paint program are you using??? It makes a difference. Here's a tutorial for Photoshop. In Paint Shop Pro (and probably Photoshop) there is a handy tool called "burn" that you can use on edges to give it more of the look you are looking forward. But having the shadows on the picture make it look as if the picture is in a frame that has been torn instead of the picture itself being burned (I'm referring to the top of the page.)Attached Link: http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Parc/6998/graphics/burnt.html
Here's one for Paint Shop Pro that may give you some ideas.Explore the wonderful world of masks. They can change that square into anything you want. :) Both Photoshop and Paint Shop Pro can handle quite complex masking technqiues...and you can get some extra special effects with them. Including fog or smoke if you apply the right kind of mask to a top layer and then adjust the transparency. :) I'm not familiar with Photoshop so I leave the field to someone who knows what they are talking about.
Attached Link: http://www.graffici.com/filtres/filter_attack.htm
There is a wonderful photoshop/psp filter called "Filter Attacks" that does a nice burn look. This is one of it's frames used with a smudge on the edges.Diane
Attached Link: http://www.atpm.com/4.04/page9.shtml
I don't see the white line but I guess that's because I don't view on a black ground. Here's a suggestion from another tutorial about getting rid of a border around the edge. Hope it helps. One suggestion I'd make is to use your tool to smudge and make your burn area less even in width. It looks just a little too regular to me.I'm not sure how you are starting your graphic but one idea would be to start off with a black background as a default, then put your photograph in as a layer on top of it. As you work with the photograph, there won't be white pixels because you have that black layer behind it, which you can always delete or merge. Many people work on a background that is close to the color that they are going to set the graphic on so that the blending of the graphic with the background is more seamless. Does that make any sense? I could, of course, be wrong in my approach. I tend to be simple minded when it comes to this stuff.
I took the liberty to redo your image and came up with this, notice the edges are very sharp.
To achieve it, this is the trick.
See result.
I hope that helped
JV
Software: Daz Studio 4.15, Photoshop CC, Zbrush 2022, Blender 3.3, Silo 2.3, Filter Forge 4. Marvelous Designer 7
Hardware: self built Intel Core i7 8086K, 64GB RAM, RTX 3090 .
"If you spend too much time arguing about software, you're spending too little time creating art!" ~ SomeSmartAss
"A critic is a legless man who teaches running." ~ Channing Pollock
for a burnt edge...here is the recepie I use (In photoshop) 1)use rectangular marque too and make a selection within the image you wish the burnt edges on 2)switch to quick mask mode 3)Filters-Pixilate-Crystalize to get a jagged edge 4)switch back out of the mask mode 5)copy and past this cut out into a new layer 6)re-select your previous crystalized selection 7)contract your selection by 5 pixels (or however many you want) 8)feather your selection by 5 pixels (or however many) 9) select inverse 10) adjust your brightness/darkness to darken the edge to give it a burned look ...and maybe tweek this with your burn tool to vary the depth of the burn If you want to save it for the web as a gif, make sure your background background colour is the same as the page you want it on.
Thanks for the advice everyone. I have the burn technique pretty well done but I'm obviously pretty dense about getting a transparent gif. If I could upload a psd file this wouldn't be a problem. So I've just decided to skip the whole burnt edges thing and just post the image in the gallery. It's there in case you still want to look at it.
As far as I know transparent GIFs allow only totally transparent or totally opaque pixels, so translucent pixels get driven to one extreme or the other. Your white edges are the result of that. Why do you need to use GIF? It isn't generally a good format for photographic or rendered images, so unless you need to put it on a website over a variable and unpredictable background you would do better to create a rectangular composite of your image over its intended background in PS and save that in a 24-bit format like PSD, Tif or (as a copy) JPG.
Attached Link: http://www.wolfhome.com/faq/transparency/
There are various tutorials on the web about how to get rid of the stray pixels around a transparent gif. RHaseltine is right, of course, but I think PapaBlueMartin was experimenting with the technique. It's fun to play sometimes.I agree with RHaseltine. AFAIK, when you generate a gif with transparency, you have to specify the color from the palette that will be transparent. Any anti-aliasing, as someone mentioned is going to screw up the effect. PNG also supports transparency but it is not supported correctly in all browsers i.e. IE for Windows).
"Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken
"Art images should be GIF or JPG format only. The full image should be between 100 x 100 and 4000 x 4000 pixels and be less than 512 KB in size. The thumbnail image (if supplied) should be between 50 x 50 and 200 x 200 pixels and be less than 15 kb in size." I wanted to use a psd but the gallery here doesn't support it. So if I want to use a non-square shape I have to use a gif file.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.