Wed, Nov 20, 9:01 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Poser - OFFICIAL



Welcome to the Poser - OFFICIAL Forum

Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom

Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 20 6:12 am)



Subject: new free character


  • 1
  • 2
xantor ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 8:32 AM

Devilchu5 click on the small picture with DSH003 on it and then click on http://www.marinenet.co.jp/z3d/free/DSH003_Win.zip ok? You could probably copy and paste the http:// line to just download the object from here.


Dale B ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 8:33 AM

Riddokun; Yah, the hips do need some work. And some breast morphs (angle and shape). Some more articulation in the feet would be nice as well (hey, I'm greedy. Once you play with Judy a bit, the ol' P4 shovel-foot leaps out at you even more). Of course if the genital morphs are an example of the kind of design quality the creator can do, I can't wait to see just what she does about the other morphs! That has got to be one of the best sets of built in naughty bits I've seen to date. Kaedeko is quite there yet, but there is some real potential in the offing....


Poppi ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 8:54 AM

thanks for the heads up. as for the nudity flag for folks who are surfing at work....the operative word is "work". perhaps working more and surfing less on your end might do wonders to placate those nasty bosses....just a thought, since i have recently seen this problem pop up frequently, of late. and, if there is ABSOLUTELY no work to be found to be done, why not try learning something that will benefit those who pay you? sheesh. do you realize how silly this issue of zero tolerance for nudity in the workplace sounds to those of us who sort of think to earn an honest dollar one should at least try and put in an honest day's work....surfing, nudes or not, just isn't working unless you are getting something for your job.


Ghastly ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 9:46 AM

My thoughts exactly, Poppi.


sea_x_arising ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 10:09 AM

Eye roll


---Gallego--- ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 10:34 AM

.............at work they pay me to WORK.....not to SURF......."sigh" i wish i could surf at work like other people.....


StolenHeart20 ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 10:36 AM

bunch of idiots need to grow up i cant believe how far this thread went.. before i click i thought all those replys was comments and i was like damn let me have a look and all i see is a bunch of hippies wasting peoples time talking hee-ha about if i can see her bare knees and elbows... geez


pakled ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 11:00 AM

well, considering all the things I have to support here, the fact that most of our documentation is now web-based, and being in IT, things don't steadily break, the key is balance. We don't spend 8 hours a day surfing, but maybe an hour is all I'll do here. They pay me to work as well, but with 8,000 people on campus, they can't watch them all..and they do watch. We have web parsers that search for profanity, etc., web logs, etc.
Our company understands that. They know a certain amount of surfing is going to happen regardless, and supervisors are within their rights to regulate the amount of it going on. I don't spend my entire day here, mainly just my lunch hour..;) sometimes late in the day (I work 'till 6 est), when nothing's going on.
I do have to take precautions when coming to the site; I delete all off-line content when going into the gallery (as much stuff as there is, it helps with system resources as well). I'm not going to go off the deep end; if the flag's been set on a thread, I'll check it out when I go home. If you've already created the picture, you've excersised your freedom as an artist. All the tag does is describe it. It draws some folks in, and puts others off...such is life. All we're saying is it would be a nice gesture to use the tag responsibly (and you know it makes the hit count go up, right?..;)

I wish I'd said that.. The Staircase Wit

anahl nathrak uth vas betude doth yel dyenvey..;)


Ratteler ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 3:03 PM

I wasn't planning to respond to the off topic comments here. I thought very hard to fight my instinct to "fire" back. Under philosophy that I would only be "adding fuel to the fire" I tried to hold my tongue. But I realized that it is SILENCE that is the goal of those who are so aggressively attacking people in this forum. Should I allow myself to be silenced, they would win by default. Courtesy is only courtesy if it NOT required. That is what makes it special. That is it is given. If it is demanded it is no longer courtesy, but at the very least regulation, if not tyranny and censorship. Respect is like courtesy in that it cannot be demanded, or it fails to be respect. Respect can only be requested and earned. It is earned by communicating with others and building a common ground where others can understand the negative feelings they are causing you. Then letting them chose NOT to do that. However tormenting people into following YOUR rules, while bringing a similar result, does not earn you respect. It only causes fear and with fear, comes resentment. What is really disturbing to me is that here, in an art community where freedom of expression and opinion is expected to be the norm, there is growing movement to impose a few peoples opinion by fear. Fear of conflict, fear of verbal assault, fear of reprisal, and fear of exile should you righteously fire back those attempting to silence you. I don't care if this is Politically Correct to say or not, but this tactic of scaring people into silence is wrong. It is EXACTLY the same type of philosophy that allowed the Black Shirts to take over Nazi Germany in the 30's and 40's. It is the same logic that allowed religious fanatics to come to the conclusion that it was THEIR RIGHT to fly planes into the World Trade Center on 9-11-01. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. What I find offensive is that it is becoming "OK" to berate and attempt to silence some one whose opinion you don't like. It is a deliberate personal attack to get their way not by convincing people of the validity of your opinion, but by scaring them into silence. WELL I WILL NOT BE SILENT. If you claim to be an adult, then you should be able to discuss WHY your opinion is more valid than mine. Simply proclaiming that "I" am some how bad or evil and I must restrict myself because "SOME ONE" finds it offensive is not a valid argument. THAT LOGIC is what won't wash. I will not be terrorized by people who think they can simply shove their opinion of right and wrong down my throat. I AM open to discussion. I will ALWAYS respond in some way to REASON. But if the "SHUT UP cause I don't like what you're saying" crowd is allowed to continue with the behavior they have shown here, this isn't a place I want to be. Don't let the fact that they use the words "courtesy", and "respect" fool you into thinking they have SHOWN those traits. Sooner or later the staff or Renderosity will be forced to choose a side. Are they going to allow fear rule this forum, or respect? Will we all get to decide how much courtesy we show, or will we regulated? It might as well be sooner. If they are going to side with those who are exercising a campaign of verbal terror on this community, then I have lost nothing by expelled from here by taking my stand. I'm sorry I had to add fuel to this fire. But maybe this way it will burn itself out quicker and we get back to normal forum life.


JoeyAristophanes ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 3:15 PM

It is EXACTLY the same type of philosophy that allowed the Black Shirts to take over Nazi Germany in the 30's and 40's Well, it took sixty posts, but we finally got the inevitable reference to Hitler and Nazism. I wondered when that was going to happen. Yeah, anytime someone gets asked to follow a few simple rules, it's NAZIS and CENSORSHIP and OPPRESSION. Get real.


TrekkieGrrrl ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 3:29 PM

Sorry but I too can't see how a polite request to use the nudity filter could in any way be seen as cencorship, let alone a nasty, despicable thing as nazism. Honestly it is none of your business whether or not I surf during my lunch break. If my company has allowed it UNDER CERTAIN GUIDELINES, it is not your business to tell me to work DURING MY BREAK. My company has allowed surfing during lunch break, but we're not supposed to watch porn. And if you look in a browser's cache and find a picture of a naked wonam, you can argue till hell freezes over that it's ART, becourse out of context, it a NUDE! Now I'm lucky, becourse I have my own office. I have my back to a wall, so NOONE but me can see what's on my screen, but if Pakled works a place where he does not have that luxury, while still allowed to surf in his breaks, WHY is it the necessary to make that a jeopardy for him just becourse you won't "cencor" your pictures by clicking the nudity button? It's not like he can't see them, if he chooses to - at his HOME! You could as well be at home with kids around you and you might not want to expose them to naked people. Personally I don't mind if my kids sees naked pixels, but some might. Both my kids (8 and 13) play with Poser, and the little one still gets the giggles over a character she once found with quite a DONG. It was sooooo funny and she still speaks of it. But some might indeed NOT want their kids to see the same picture online. It's their choice by clicking the nudity filter. YOU are the ones that are beraving them of THEIR FREE CHOISE by not using the button, thereby imposing YOUR views onto them. It's kinda like raping a nun, bluntly speaking. People that know my wievs also know that I personally is as liberal as can be in regards to nudity. After all, I live in "porn country" - Denmark if you're in doubt. but I think epople should have a right to choose what NOT to look at too.

FREEBIES! | My Gallery | My Store | My FB | Tumblr |
You just can't put the words "Poserites" and "happy" in the same sentence - didn't you know that? LaurieA
  Using Poser since 2002. Currently at Version 11.1 - Win 10.



bwldrd ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 3:47 PM

IF SHE'S NOT WEARING ANY CLOTHES, SHE'S NUDE... With what is shown, how do you know she doesnt have on the pasties from antons diamonds, and a clamshell?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consider me insane if you wish, but is your reality any better?


Lyrra ( ) posted Tue, 25 November 2003 at 4:32 PM

okay. I'm declaring this thread dead Sorry guys, y'all are getting a little too over excited Lyrra



  • 1
  • 2

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.