Renderosity Forums / Bryce
Welcome to the Bryce Forum
Forum Moderators: TheBryster
Bryce F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 12 7:03 am)
Subject: OK so are they fake or not
- 1
- 2
Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=979790&Start=1&Artist=acva&ByArtist=Yes
That compared to the two that followed, with the last i can't even find where the bryce part is, in the other one it is the little figure in the down right corner. But this is Acva we are talking about, he/she has done such things before, its by no doubts a bryce-artists, but there is a lot of work in the gallery that should not be called Bryce mainly for the simple reason that bryce is only a smal percentage of the total. Post-work can lift a work to higher grounds, but sometimes....Robert van der Veeke Basugasubasubasu Basugasubakuhaku Gasubakuhakuhaku!! "Better is the enemy of good enough." Dr. Mikoyan of the Mikoyan Gurevich Design Bureau.
Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=1115&Start=1&Sectionid=2&filter_genre_id=0&MostWante
we have to remember that the 4th most viewed Bryce image is a low quality jpeg with a water plane... http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=1115&Start=1&Sectionid=2&filter_genre_id=0&MostWanted=Yes
Yeah, you people are all FAR too Polite about it. This guy's a sham, and on top of that, a fucking liar. I hate liars. I have no problem calling him/her out, I don't know what you are all so afraid of. We all know what Bryce is capable of. And we all KNOW what a photograph looks like. I have NO idea why anyone would even take this guy seriously, and all those stupid comments just make all those idiots who posted, "good work!" look like a bunch of total morons. If you're too stupid to be able to tell the difference between a photo and a render, you have no business doing graphics in the first place. There's nothing fun, funny, or remotely cool about being a liar, and there's even LESS good done by supporting such people. This person should be banned from Renderosity, at the very least. Hell, I've been banned for less, myself. In the USA, we call this "Fraud".
Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=899903&Start=1&Artist=acva&ByArtist=Yes
Well, it seems that one of them FOR SURE cant tell the difference in this photo. Hes got skills, but now no need to lie bout your works. If its a photo, post it as photo. In the attached link, even one of em says "where U get the bird, I want it". Well if he/she really wants that bird, well I would say go outside and look for one, cause sure U aint gonna find one from online artists, cause is REAL. Its true and I agree, commeting on his lies just aint right. This reminds me of that guy with the 3D Studio Image, the one with the room setup, where u can see for sure that its a photo. People just dont know when to quit. Post the darn things in the right galleries. When people like these do this, then others expect the same results, which we all know aint gonna happen. Someone tell this guy to get a life or something.
I know that rock texture next to the poser figure, because I've got it and have used it. The rest is - as we have all identified a photo composite. Perhaps we need a new category for composites. I mean I don't mind it as a pic and all. My question is, why was it posted in the Bryce gallery and not the Poser Gallery.
<strong>bandolin</strong><br />
[Former 3DS Max forum coordinator]<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.renderosity.com/homepage.php">Homepage</a> ||
<a href="http://www.renderosity.com/mod/sitemail/">SiteMail</a> ||
<a href="http://excalibur.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/browse.php?user_id=70375">
Gallery</a> || <a href="http://www.renderosity.com/mod/freestuff/index.php?username=bandolin">
Freestuff</a>
<p><em>Caution: just a hobbyist</em></p>
All of the above!
Available on Amazon for the Kindle E-Reader
All the Woes of a World by Jonathan Icknield aka The Bryster
And in my final hours - I would cling rather to the tattooed hand of kindness - than the unblemished hand of hate...
Thats my two cents....
Mark
Seeing the pic above got me thinking that the tower above the 'church' is all wrong. I don't ever recall having seen a 'church' with this kind of tower/steeple. It should either be square in section with a pyramid type roof or not be there at all.....proof of 3d work perhaps?
Available on Amazon for the Kindle E-Reader
All the Woes of a World by Jonathan Icknield aka The Bryster
And in my final hours - I would cling rather to the tattooed hand of kindness - than the unblemished hand of hate...
Attached Link: http://sorry.vse.cz/~xdolm11/travelling/ireland/glendalough-church.jpg
oh.. you find those churches in Ireland And found it ^____^ Its Glendalough churchMessage edited on: 06/17/2005 10:20
Robert van der Veeke Basugasubasubasu Basugasubakuhaku Gasubakuhakuhaku!! "Better is the enemy of good enough." Dr. Mikoyan of the Mikoyan Gurevich Design Bureau.
Then you might check out this website as well http://www.atpm.com/10.11/ireland/images/thomastown-gardens.jpg http://www.atpm.com/10.11/ireland/images/glendalough-abbey.jpg http://www.atpm.com/10.11/ireland/ Questions?
Robert van der Veeke Basugasubasubasu Basugasubakuhaku Gasubakuhakuhaku!! "Better is the enemy of good enough." Dr. Mikoyan of the Mikoyan Gurevich Design Bureau.
ewwww that's disgusting ... what do they think, that the web is only for them to use? that we cannot find their sources if we want? ...
www.Bucketload3d.com - where cool
freebies are ~(==^..^)
Hmmm, what a laugh!!! Ignoring people like that is the best solution. Must say though, a lot of artist here use composing techniques, clouds for one. And how many people actually build their own models? I think its great to see a well thought out scene with other peoples models but, at the same time I think, hey! what the hell did you actually do in this scene to deserve some credit. This technique tends to squash the artist who try to build everything from scratch, spending days if not weeks busting their guts. One more thing before I go get some sleep, whats up with the poser models that are imported into Bryce then simply rendered and chucked in the Bryce gallery. Is it because the Bryce gallery gets so much attention, people think this is the only place to post to be seen. Bull shit If you ask me. Oh yeah! I think those renders are FAKE!!! It would be good to hear it from the sheeps mouth!
I never intended to make art.
They are definitely photographs. RobertJ put the link to the site where he got them in the comments. I have no problem with using a photograph for a background so long as the photograph isn't the main focus of the scene. I think that you should learn to make your own backgrounds, or at least take the photographs yourself, though (otherwise it's just a rank ameteur trying to get attention and/or learn the basic tools while not producing the same crap everyone else on his level is). "Summer" is pretty obviously computer generated. I don't know why the guy feels like he has to post other people's photographs if he can do that (unless, of course, "Summer" is also stolen from someone else). It's not Bryce I think... and the trees in the background are of course photographs. But that sky is very Brycean. And sans-- Couldn't agree more my friend. The point is to learn something, even if you use other people's stuff. But to add something, you only use other people's stuff with their express written permission and give the proper credit. Neither of which he did.
Sorry Erlik that U cant get one out there, as I cant find one here either lol. Maybe if we ask him, he can point us to the artist who created it and buy it from him/her. Wonder if he/she will sell the real one, hehehehehehe. As many said before, its best to just ignore those types of people. It just ticks me off when I see crap like that, and it takes some of us (me for one), days and even weeks to create something. Heck I work on some of the images for weeks in a row, and most of U do too, and to just see crap like this just degrates art itself, let alone the artist. But from what I understood, is that if U use another's photo or creation etc etc, U have to get permission, or am I wrong? Wonder if he/she did get that permission, probably not. Robertj, U THA MAN, them links are a great find. Wonder what he/she thinks bout it now. lgp692000, there was another guy like this one, where he created (so he says) a living room in 3D Studio, but it looked like a photo, well actually it was a photo. I dont remember who put that link here, but I guess U can search the forum for Fake, and probably will find it. Just ignore these types of people, but putting a link to the real photo under his/her gallery would really make it worthwhile, lol. Nice work Robert, very nice work.
I just did a search for the thread and found it. I know that photo because I saved it and used it for inspiration on one of my works "Penthouse in the City" http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=781971&Start=19&Artist=lgp692000&ByArtist=Yes As you can see, I did what a real creator would have. Only used the photo (and many others like it) to get a feel for what I wanted to design. You won't find my image in a google search unless you find my image. The backdrop outside the window is a photo, but I do not think there is a doubt about that. DOWN WITH THE POSERS (ummm, I mean wanna-be's)!!!
With his/her tail between legs I bet! Good work all, I think this forum should scare off any other no good two bit liars. Don't mess with the Bryce detective agency. Don't get me wrong on the comment about using clouds and whatever. Its cool as shinyary2 wrote, its cool so long as its not the main focus, hey I was tired too.
I never intended to make art.
Some of the works in the gallery appear to be genuine bryce renders. If you are doing a composite exercise, at least say so and if possible attribute the image you are working with. To claim otherwise IS both foolish and potentially actionable. The wolf images I have some serious questions about though. The proof wireframe does NOT match the image it purports to prove. The posing is wrong and the mountain terrain is wrong.
Pass no temptation lightly by, for one never knows when it may pass again!
RobertJ, ooo...errr just keepin' ya on your toes sir, glad to be of service to you.
Back to the subject of this post, IMHO I think the use of photographic material in a render is OK, as long as the author points out it's use in the render. I can understand peoples annoyance with this sort of thing, 'cos it really bug's me as well.
Theย wait can be horrific,ย butย the outcome can be worseย - pumeco 2006
Attached Link: http://www.artthatsnew.com/artwork/scripts/artofwolves/wolves-individual.cfm?ArtworkID=329
*Shakes head*___
Ockham's razor- It's that simple
Does anyone ever consider that these people don't realize they are making a mistake and that maybe gently pointing out to them that they should state what parts are not bryce in their gallery pieces would save them all this hassle. Ommission does not mean guilt, it may mean ignorance. I think next time you guys come across this sort of thing, instead of doing the lynch mob thing you might want to kindly explain to the person what the majority of us here know, and thats to state the non-bryce things below their picture. Then if the person chooses to ignore this, fine, have at him/her.
Ang is wise.
Available on Amazon for the Kindle E-Reader
All the Woes of a World by Jonathan Icknield aka The Bryster
And in my final hours - I would cling rather to the tattooed hand of kindness - than the unblemished hand of hate...
At first I did consider all factors of the situation. My original kneejerk reaction was to point out this thread was overly aggressive. I still somewhat feel that way and not how I would have approached it, yet that's my personal view . After exploring this persons gallery, inspecting each and every piece, reading each & every comment, the facts speak for themselves. There is even a mock up wireframe to dispell the question of validaty of the image that I posted a link to the original artwork. Knowingly posting someone elses artwork is wrong to say the least, and secifically illeagal. We all question our own practices each time we publish OUR art work. Deep down inside our conscience tells us if we are crossing those boundries. If this continues as a regular practice it could not only damage the credibility of the person posting these, but also the rest of this community. There is a responsiblitly for all members here. I suppose tact is just a matter of opinion. ICM (my 2 cents)
___
Ockham's razor- It's that simple
But what about the outright missapropriation of the wolf images (if they cannot prove they are the artist who painted them). The purported proof bryce wireframe is just NOT accurate to the image it is reputed to be. To me this implies knowlege and deception. A full explanation as to why along with proof of authorship is what is needed now. Another thing bugging me - the styles of the various paintings are too varied to typically belong to one artist as well. While this on its own is not definitive, combined with other actions/images, it does cause serious questions for me.
Pass no temptation lightly by, for one never knows when it may pass again!
I completely agree with you, as I stated, the facts are there. They knew it was fraud, my only apprehension is publically bitch slapping someone. This is why we have this system in place to allow fair treatment for everyone. If they have broken the community rules then the PTB must deal with this accordingly. Which in this case is removal of the images in question, & a befitting reprimand. ie: termed suspension.
___
Ockham's razor- It's that simple
- 1
- 2
Privacy Notice
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=980397&Start=55&Sectionid=2&filter_genre_id=0&WhatsN
I've looked at the artist's gallery and the skill to create these might be there, but while it may have surpassed fantastic ratings from most viewers, I remain a tad skeptical. As my nemesis clonex tends to say, shows me the wireframe!On the url, I think in addition to the rediculous texture detail, the white-out sky blending into the leaves is what gives it away. The artist may have done a fill on the sky and it gives us those purpleish smears.
Look also on cemetary (http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=980594&Start=-17&Artist=acva&ByArtist=Yes) and see if it looks a bit chewy to you.
MoonGoat
(Paranoid) EDIT: Worng Speling
Message edited on: 06/16/2005 22:06