Tue, Oct 22, 6:36 AM CDT

Renderosity Forums / Poser - OFFICIAL



Welcome to the Poser - OFFICIAL Forum

Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom

Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Oct 22 3:39 am)



Subject: OT - Survey - What screen size do you use? ... ;=] ...


kuroyume0161 ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 12:59 PM

Acadia said: I want the screen at the link above!!!!!!!!! My birthday is March 1st .... HINT!!!! hehe Wow, and eight grand is right within my superfluous gifting budget! ;0)

C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg off.

 -- Bjarne Stroustrup

Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone


billisfree ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 1:00 PM

1280x960 19" monitor


Foxseelady ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 1:05 PM

1024/768 and boy do I feel deprived now lol


Asciicodeplus ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 1:11 PM

1152x864


xantor ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 1:17 PM

800x600


Neyjour ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 1:40 PM

1024 x 768

"You don't know what we can see
Why don't you tell your dreams to me
Fantasy will set you free." - Steppenwolf


Robo2010 ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 1:41 PM

1280x1024 17 inch TFT monitor


anxcon ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 1:43 PM

drools huge @$$ monitor! i want :(


operaguy ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 1:45 PM

1920x1200 Dell 24" LCD. Even then, though, I STILL run out of real estate with my preview window set to 720x540 when all the animation tools are open. :: og ::


Hanz ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 2:01 PM

Hey there Dr., I use 1440 x 900 (17" widescreen) on my Fujitsu Siemens m3438 laptop...


Tyger_purr ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 2:18 PM

I just went from 1024x768 15" laptop to a 1280x800 15" laptop. I have and use black cds for music and data.

My Homepage - Free stuff and Galleries


richardson ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 2:32 PM

1600x1200


Jim Burton ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 2:37 PM

file_325752.jpg

2 x 21" monitors running 1280 x 960. Beware of non 4/3 resolutions! Isn't this a sweet setup? ;-)


geep ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 2:45 PM

file_325753.jpg

re: non-4/3 resolutions ... Good point Jim.

BTW - nice setup - what CPUs are you running?

cheers,
dr geep
;=]

Remember ... "With Poser, all things are possible, and poseable!"


cheers,

dr geep ... :o]

edited 10/5/2019



geep ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 2:49 PM

BTW - I run a non 4/3 resolution. It's 1280 x 1024 because I have a 19" TFT and that is what the mfgr recommends and, also, it provides the best display.

If I try to use a 4/3 resolution, things get "fuzzy." ;=[

cheers,
dr geep
;=]

Remember ... "With Poser, all things are possible, and poseable!"


cheers,

dr geep ... :o]

edited 10/5/2019



Nalif ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 3:36 PM

1680x1050 :) I'm running on a Dell 2005FPW. I'd be upgrading to the 24" widescreen Dell has right now if I could convince someone to take this one off my hands :)


operaguy ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 3:39 PM

what's wrong with non-4/3 screen size setups? 4:3 equates to 1.333 I am running 1920:1200 which equates to 1.6, but it's just for screen real estate. Please explain. ::::: Opera :::::


logansfury ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 4:13 PM

17" monitor at 800x600 Im in the freakin stone age. Poser 5 takes time to work around in for sure......


SamTherapy ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 4:24 PM

"what's wrong with non-4/3 screen size setups?" Because graphics apps are set for a 4:3 aspect ratio. Anything else and graphics will appear to be either somewhat squished or somewhat elongated.

Coppula eam se non posit acceptera jocularum.

My Store

My Gallery


svdl ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 4:32 PM

2560x1024 (2x 1280x1024) 19" TFTs on my primary Poser workstation 1600x1200 19" CRT on my primary Vue workstation. Those Dell UltraSharps 24" and 30" look nice, but they're a bit too pricey for my budget. When prices drop, I'll get one of those for sure. About that 4:3 setups: those are right for CRTs, they'll get you square pixels. TFTs often have other dimensions, a 5:4 setup (1280x1024) will get you square pixels. It's usually best to run a TFT at its native resolution. Other resolutions are often blurry. CRTs don't have this problem. But a TFT at its native resolution is sharper than any CRT.

The pen is mightier than the sword. But if you literally want to have some impact, use a typewriter

My gallery   My freestuff


kuroyume0161 ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 4:54 PM · edited Sat, 11 February 2006 at 4:56 PM

*"what's wrong with non-4/3 screen size setups?"

Because graphics apps are set for a 4:3 aspect ratio. Anything else and graphics will appear to be either somewhat squished or somewhat elongated.*

You know, you can fix that if you use another aspect ratio. There are these buttons on the monitor that let you adject horizontal/vertical position and size! ;) I'd like to add: Yes, I'm pedantic. I always set the colors to be equivalent and do some correction. I also literally measure the visible display on the monitor so that it matches the aspect of the resolution. Can't fail (well, unless you have an LCD without these controls...) Message edited on: 02/11/2006 16:56

C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg off.

 -- Bjarne Stroustrup

Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone


Porthos ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 5:05 PM

17" Screen @ 1024x768.8)

MS Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit SP1
Intel Core i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 12.0GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 7770

PoserPro 2012 (SR1) - Units: Metres , Corel PSP X4 and PSE 9


geep ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 5:19 PM

???????????? .8 ??????????????????? See, I do read all these posts. ;=]

Remember ... "With Poser, all things are possible, and poseable!"


cheers,

dr geep ... :o]

edited 10/5/2019



diolma ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 5:20 PM

1280x1024. 'Cos that's the max (at 4:3 ratio(?) ) that my monitor (which I believe is 17") can provide and still let me read the text.. Cheers, Diolma



Jim Burton ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 5:21 PM

file_325754.jpg

Yeah, you can adjust the monitor physical to match the pixel aspect ratio, but then your giving up screen size. If you rotate a circle 90 degress with a non 4/3 display it circle becomes an oval. ;-) I've got a 3.2 Pentium overclocked to 3.5 on my main system, I sometime fire up the other computer which is an old AMD 1.3, it is connected via a KVM switch and network cards. I sorta bought my house with how I was going to setup my computer room in mind, here is a panoramic pic of the whole deal, I couldn't get it into one picture! ;-)


geep ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 5:29 PM

That looks like a li'l peace [sic] of heaven! ;=]

Remember ... "With Poser, all things are possible, and poseable!"


cheers,

dr geep ... :o]

edited 10/5/2019



operaguy ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 5:30 PM

i am not following this conversation. For instance, "If you rotate a circle 90 degress with a non 4/3 display it circle becomes an oval" is not remotely true on my 16:10 monitor. I knew it was not, but tested it just now in my 2D app with a bit-mappped circle. Doesn't matter which way I turn it, it is/looks round. Do you mean "If you have a non-4:3 monitor, and set it to a 4:3 screen resolution like 1024x768, things will be distored?" If that's what you mean, then yes. But then, if you have a big 19" CRT, which is intended to be 4:3, but set the desktop resolution to be 1920x1200, which is not 4:3, you'd get a distored desktop also, right? But don't people with 'whatever' display size adjust their settings to the correct aspect ratio for the monitor, so everything is nice and normal? ::::: Opera :::::


operaguy ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 5:31 PM

now jim, admit it. You cleaned up the desktop before you took those pictures. VERY COOL SETUP!


operaguy ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 5:32 PM

what is a TFT, and how is it different than CRT and LCD?


bandolin ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 5:46 PM

I'm always amazed at the amount of responses a simple question like this gets.


<strong>bandolin</strong><br />
[Former 3DS Max forum coordinator]<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.renderosity.com/homepage.php">Homepage</a> ||
<a href="http://www.renderosity.com/mod/sitemail/">SiteMail</a> ||
<a href="http://excalibur.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/browse.php?user_id=70375">
Gallery</a> || <a href="http://www.renderosity.com/mod/freestuff/index.php?username=bandolin">
Freestuff</a>
<p><em>Caution: just a hobbyist</em></p>


diolma ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 6:06 PM

TFT: = "Terrifying Financial Threat" I suspect...:-)) Cheers, Diolma



Khai ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 6:12 PM · edited Sat, 11 February 2006 at 6:13 PM

" TFT: = "Terrifying Financial Threat"

I suspect...:-))"

naw.. thats upgrading system so it can run Vista, buying Vista..

just so you can play Halo 2 on your PC.

...cheaper to buy an XBOX...

Message edited on: 02/11/2006 18:13


svdl ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 6:27 PM

TFT=Thin Film Transistor. LCD=Liquid Crystal Display. Both are used for flatscreens. LCD is the older technology. LCD used to have a terrible response time. So if you moved your mouse, the display couldn't refresh fast enough to keep up with the movement. Tricks like mouse trails were needed to keep your mouse pointer visible. TFT had faster response times and better colors, but was far more expensive. That describes the situation of a couple of years ago. I'm not sure how things are right now. I should catch up on my tech reading...

The pen is mightier than the sword. But if you literally want to have some impact, use a typewriter

My gallery   My freestuff


Daio ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 6:41 PM

1152x870

"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer." -- Bruce Graham


kawecki ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 7:15 PM

1024x768 on a 14" monitor 800x600 on a 17" monitor!!!!!

Stupidity also evolves!


Jim Burton ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 10:12 PM

Operaguy- The pixel ratio has to match the monitor aspect ratio. 1920 x 1200 is a perfect match for a 16:10 monitor, most monitors are still 4:3, though. I started on 3D many years ago on a system that had a Targa 16 card with 512:486 resolution, the rotate the circle effect was VERY noticable on them! The old EGA cards were 640 x 350 too, also far from 4:3. I also remember Macs had this monitor you could rotate (physically) 90 degrees to get a full page display, tall and narrow, now that I think of it. Anyway, most "modern" display cards offer square ratios. I mostly mentioned this for the people who have a choice between 1280 x 1024 and 1280 x 960 modes, in this case more gives you less, perhaps. ;-)


tainted_heart ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 10:36 PM

1024 x 768 each on dual monitors.

It's all fun and games...
Until the flying monkeys attack!!! 


Wombat ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 10:47 PM

1 x AMD64 3 GHz 1 x AMD Athlon 1.8 GHz 1 x AMD K6/III 400 MHz for storywriting 1 x Intel Pentium III 800 MHz in Notebook


kuroyume0161 ( ) posted Sat, 11 February 2006 at 11:32 PM

CPUS: 2 x Intel Xeon 2.66GHz 2 x Intel PIII 1.0 GHz 1 x AMD64 3500+ 1 x 1.8GHz G5 PPC Eventually want to upgrade that AMD64 to a 4600+ or 4800+ dual core. :P

C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg off.

 -- Bjarne Stroustrup

Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone


operaguy ( ) posted Sun, 12 February 2006 at 12:48 AM

AMD 3500+ i am really hoping Poser 7 takes advantage of more than 1Gig Ram and is dual core and/or dual processor aware. That would be glorious. ::::: Opera :::::


vilian ( ) posted Sun, 12 February 2006 at 2:42 AM

Hiya Doc :-) I'm using 800x600 - you can't go any higher with 15" monitor without tiny icons/letters/everything trying to kill your poor weak eyes :( My Poser scene window is usually 380x380 or 480x360. It's small, but posing is still posible - by rotating camera and zooming in often.



Outdated gallery over at DeviantArt

Fics at FanFiction.net and Archive of Our Own (AO3)


Casette ( ) posted Sun, 12 February 2006 at 4:17 AM

1024 x 768


CASETTE
=======
"Poser isn't a SOFTWARE... it's a RELIGION!"


Jules53757 ( ) posted Sun, 12 February 2006 at 5:38 AM

1280 x 1024 on a 19 " CRT, but for surfing I switch to 1024 x 768.0 due to the small letters 8-)


Ulli


"Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience!"


Indoda ( ) posted Sun, 12 February 2006 at 7:19 AM

1024 x 768

The important thing is not to stop questioning.
- Albert Einstein

Indoda


Mike K ( ) posted Sun, 12 February 2006 at 7:42 AM
Online Now!

1280 x 960 on my 19" flat screen CRT at home, and 1280 x 1024 on twin 19" TFT panels at work. The Viewsonic TFTs at work are built to 5/4 ratio. Rhino circles look perfectly round. Mike K


stephaniebt ( ) posted Sun, 12 February 2006 at 8:27 AM

I'm glad I'm not the only one who uses 800 X 600, and that's on a 19" monitor.


radstorm ( ) posted Sun, 12 February 2006 at 10:14 AM

1024 x 768 on one.. 800 x 600 on da other :0)


Dave-So ( ) posted Sun, 12 February 2006 at 10:18 AM

1024x768 how many monitors can any one video card support that supports more than one? With those new pci-e cards, where folks plug in 2 vid cards, can you have 4 monitors hooked up ??? Can you remove the case of a CRT to make them appear closer together ? then mount in a home-made case? kinda like modding your PC ????? such ideas for an early Sunday morning

Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it.
Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together.
All things connect......Chief Seattle, 1854



Khai ( ) posted Sun, 12 February 2006 at 10:22 AM · edited Sun, 12 February 2006 at 10:24 AM

erm.. I've seen one setup posted online.. where the tester had put 6 PCI-E Vid cards in and had hooked up 12 monitors...

my Geforce will only support 2 monitors... :*( as to the ratio / circle debate.. in my modeler of choice when I do circles... I type the size I want in. and it's then a perfect circle ;) I trust the numbers in the program more lol (and I never do 2D circles freehand. use the Shift key in Photoshop ;))

Message edited on: 02/12/2006 10:24


Kendra ( ) posted Sun, 12 February 2006 at 12:35 PM

1680x1050

...... Kendra


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.