Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 29 7:57 am)
Her arm looks better in this render. Did you shift her a bit? If you do go back later, you might still try my suggestions, but this is a stunning image just the way it is. I admire your patience. We'll see if I have anough to ever do anything this complicated when I get Bryce (in the next couple of days I hope). Keep up the good work. You are getting better day by day! Diane G
Thanks all (and LOL at Coldrake's image). However, I checked out newc's point and the eagle should be about 30-31" tall so I've enlarged him, moved the cardinal, changed the perspective and when I have time, plan to repose the woman and reREPLACE her. (I also put the light back in, but when I duplicated the light near the eagle, I got 31 extra lights LOL--that took awhile to delete all those-could NOT figure out what the huge glare was in my nano picture in Bryce). Oh, and yes, Diane, I did shift her a bit when I deleted the first, grouped her with the wineglass and brought her back in. Diane (the other)
heyas; looking great! gee, it's 'final' status didnt last long. another picture thing, up in the corner above the cardinal might balance things out a bit. um, and the swan should have dark legs and an oranger bill. (unless you looked up the mute swans and found they had orange legs, i'm not 100% sure.) you can also check the swan species spec txt file, it had measurements for them, too. cant remember off the top of my head, but they might be 60" and some have up to 7' wingspan.
Yes, you're right-final didn't last long-but I won't post it for awhile (it was all relative anyhow VBG). I'm going to work on other things and come back to the one I've adjusted later. I will check out the swan. Gee, a 60" swan would be 5 feet tall-the ones I've been in contact with have been closer to big geese, but I'll check that one too (and the colorations-I admit I took some artists' liberties here). I considered pics or a sconce(s) for the wall on the left, but was afraid it would detract from the center of the image. However, making the eagle much bigger allowed me to change perspective reasonably and moved away from the left side so it might be irrelevant. We'll see. Since this is kinda' a learning image for me, I'll probably continue to just play with it for awhile-off and on, but its getting really old for me right now. Diane
You could also add a mirror to the wall over the cardinal. Of course, that will probably increase your render time dramatically. It took 19+ hours to render a scene in Bryce 4 I did recently for the USOC (now if I can convince them that they NEED it - 8-)). I used three very reflective materials, two cloud layers, and a ground plane, and made it render at 2880 x whatever. With all that reflective material, and plenty to reflect, I'm surprised my poor Pentium 233 didn't roast. lol I started it about 7-8 pm then let it finish rendering while I was asleep (turn monitor brightness down), and when I awoke it was done. It's a big@$$ image, but worth the wait. Newc
Joker that you are. Yes, I know what THAT would do for the renders and I just don't have that much patience. On one of the Bryce forums, several talked about 29 hour renders. I've been rendering overnight, but they have still only been several hour renders. Newc, I'm going to open this conversation over in the Bryce forum tonight when I have time to compose a reasonable question. I'm interested in how others deal with knowing/not knowing how it will turn out until its rendered-quick renders (w/o materials), partial renders, etc. BTW, I've been rendering to disk. Hopefully see you there and you can answer some of my questions?!? Diane
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.