Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon
Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2025 Feb 03 6:38 am)
Attached Link: Mac Pro
The new Mac Pro looks mighty sweet! I would if I were you. :)Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations
I use it every day. Its awesome! Some of my favorite features are.. Loupe, Stacks, Keywords, Locked masters, not worrying about accidentally deleting images etc... You need MAC OSX 10.4.8 to run aperture 1.5-- You also need the latest versions of iLife and iWork to take complete advantage of its import/export features. Buy it. You won't know how you survived without it.
Question the question. Answer the question. Question the
answer...
I wish I knew what I was gonna say :oP
One of the programmes us PC owners look on with envy it is a lot of money but worth it if you need to organise ones work.. I have been trying the trial version of Lightroom which I like but again in two minds re the cost
Danny O'Byrne http://www.digitalartzone.co.uk/
"All the technique in the world doesn't compensate for the inability to notice" Eliott Erwitt
It looks like Apple recently released Aperature 2.0, with the ability to use plug-ins. That might give it the edge over Lightroom, but time will tell. Perhaps it is time for me to upgrade and get that 24" iMac Dovid recommends. ;'] Dovid, how has your experience been? Have you upgraded to 2.0 yet? Another link: http://crave.cnet.com/8301-1_105-9870127-1.html
Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations
Nope, neither. I'm still working towards getting the latest and greatest iMac. I tried it (the 2.4GHz) out at my local Apple store and it was very fast compared to my current 2.0GHz17" ALS iMac. If you're gonna get an iMac then go for the 2.8 GHz one. The 2.4 uses a mobile processor while the 2.8 uses the powerful extreme one.
Question the question. Answer the question. Question the
answer...
I wish I knew what I was gonna say :oP
Quote - Nope, neither. I'm still working towards getting the latest and greatest iMac. I tried it (the 2.4GHz) out at my local Apple store and it was very fast compared to my current 2.0GHz17" ALS iMac. If you're gonna get an iMac then go for the 2.8 GHz one. The 2.4 uses a mobile processor while the 2.8 uses the powerful extreme one.
Mobile processor? Not quite up on my Mac stuff, can you elaborate? Still, you say the 2.4 was plenty fast, right? That 24" monitor is something else too, very classy.
Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations
Attached Link: http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#iMac
ooh, look what i just found. http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#iMac if you didn't ask the question i wouldn't have found it.Question the question. Answer the question. Question the
answer...
I wish I knew what I was gonna say :oP
Neat link, thanks. Still, not a bad time to pick one up. And I don't know if you'd notice much of a speed increase to warrant getting the 2.8.
Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations
Attached Link: 2.8GHz iMac review
image from - http://www.macworld.com/article/61031/2007/11/speedmark5tests.htmlQuestion the question. Answer the question. Question the
answer...
I wish I knew what I was gonna say :oP
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Attached Link: First Look
Still not sure whether to take the leap? Visit the link.Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations