Thank you, very nice image btw, will have to give it a try.

Might be able to fake wax with a base color and a material setting using glossy or fuzzy translusance material, maybe?

Silly noobie question time... I have recently become very fond of using dynamic clothing even though I only render stills, bearing in mind that I am new to clothing dynamics and to Pose2Lux, is there anything special in saving my pz3 and workflow that I need to know to get my dynamicly clothed figures into Lux?

Looks like I'll need to try the latest next, I really could have used a candle flame in that one.  :)

Just popping in to say a quick thank you to everyone for all the work on this.  I'm not very good. but I did get my first pic done.  Don't know about posting images here, so here is a link to it 

http://forum.daz3d.com/viewtopic.php?p=2843000#2843000

Much fun and again thanks to all.

I used this http://www.renderosity.com/mod/freestuff/details.php?item_id=16496
in this pic http://tessalynne.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d2x4wd9 .  Thank you.

Well, since that file is solved I guess I can quit looking, good luck with the others, losing a drive can be really painful.

Well, I have the Michael2M3 remap, bought it at CP this past December, but I don't buy their extended download service so I'll have to search my archives for the file but can help you with that one.  It kind of bites that they don't have a system in place that would allow vendors to download their own files.

Forgive perhaps a stupid question, is the M2 remap you are referring to your Michael2M3 remap or is there another?

Thank you, it was indeed fixed on my end.

"...Or they could be like Annie and others and not even see it."

I consider this to be the most likely culprit since the actual question is the only place that says this would be an additional option.

"So all of you who cannot see the question, are you able to answer the poll?  Would this be why there is so much negativity towards having an added file type to download, a new choice to make, that wont affect zip lovers at all because they can still have them?"

No, see AnnieD's screenshot a few posts back.  We can't see the question or participate in the poll, there isn't even anything in the page display that indicates anything is missing.  To us it looks as if the text of the article itself is the question and that the poll consists of giving our opinion on it as it is written there.

Well, I don't have enough tech savvy to absolutely say how this has happened, but can now provide further info as to what is happening...

When my hubby got home, I was telling him about this oddity, so being on the same lan he fired up his system, went to rendo to the poll and he could see the question, that told us it wasn't a local network problem, but he is using the exact same browser on windows xp,  so he pulled up the source code for the page on both his machine and on mine.  The entire .poll html section is missing from the source code under my Vista system but is there and displays under his xp system when viewed with both of us using FF3.6.8.

If it was only happening in FF, I might have thought it was a browser specific error, but since it affects IE as well, I wound up back at the OS.  Since my daughter's computer uses Win7, my husband went to check there and sure enough no poll, the same .poll section is missing when she views the page on that OS.

The only guess right now that makes sense is that the page coding is somehow not compliant with the current versions of .net framework.  As my husband, who doesn't do graphics, runs xp with .net framework 2, my daughter, who does some and has the newest OS is running .net framework 3.5 and my computer, is actually running all versions through .net framework 4.0 with all the attendant patches to accommodate the variety of graphics programs I use.

Short summary, for those of us not seeing it, the html code that puts it on the page is completely absent.

Since I am already here trying to sort out something else, I'll add my voice to support this feature, with it I might actually use the forums here more often, because logging out is usually easier than prolonged biting of ones tongue. 

As for the creation of cliques, all forums have cliques, including this one and it doesn't seem to have any relationship to the ability to ignore a user existing on the site.

I don't think it makes any difference...lol
but I have a 32 bit vista home premium...

I'm starting to feel like ppl are lookin' at me funny cause they can see and I can't....  lmao!
everytime I say I can't see it...someone else comes back and tells me everything they can see it in..

Yeah, I know what you mean, you can see by my post count that I almost never post in the forums here and all I can wonder is how many of the people who had the Not No, but hell NO opinion are in the same boat we are, they are not even seeing the only place it is even mentioned that this would be in addition to the current zip option and are basing their answers on the page they see.