Renderosity Forums
Search Results: Threads
22 threads found!
- 1
- 2
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| johnpenn | 3 | 165 | ||
| johnpenn | 20 | 242 | ||
| johnpenn | 4 | 116 | ||
| johnpenn | 8 | 198 | ||
| johnpenn | 4 | 140 | ||
| johnpenn | 2 | 84 | ||
| johnpenn | 2 | 56 | ||
| johnpenn | 12 | 171 | ||
| johnpenn | 3 | 88 | ||
| johnpenn | 10 | 192 | ||
| johnpenn | 11 | 241 | ||
| johnpenn | 7 | 463 | ||
| johnpenn | 8 | 150 | ||
| johnpenn | 6 | 145 | ||
| johnpenn | 2 | 109 |
- 1
- 2
Search Results: Comments
263 comments found!
Technically, this is wizardry. Your textures are super nice. But I'm dying to ask: why do the bolts have octagonal heads, and the nut is hexagonal?
Thread: Renderosity magazine CD- want to be seen? | Forum: Bryce
So, how is it that you are associated with the magazine? And is the magazine available on newsstands where I could pick up a copy?
Thread: Quick Question. | Forum: Bryce
TIFF is cross-platform. It's also loss-less. And, it it goes through professional RIPs quickly and painlessly when using the image in print. It also supports many channels. It's a great format al around. .bmp, though viewable on most Macs, is really a Windows specific format, and it doesn't play as nicely as TIFF. I don't know if .bmp is lossy or not, I don't think it is -- not sure, but TIFF is still a better format for the compatibility with OS's and print shops. .psd is Photoshop format. It's great for using in photoshop on platforms with photoshop, but that's about it . It's great in that it supports layers; but for professional printing, it still needs to be converted to TIFF. Most pro designers keep a working copy in .psd format, and a copy to present in TIFF or EPS. It's a pain, and hopefully psd (or other comparable substitute) will become standard and make designers' lives easier, but until then, we're stuck with the TIFF.
Thread: creating a helix | Forum: Bryce
Thread: Quick Question. | Forum: Bryce
TIFF (.tif for the Macintosh impaired ;) ) is a printing standard, and it is not compressed, so it loses no detail. Keep in mind that in print, you'll need to have around 150 pixels per inch for crisp prints from an ink jet, and 300 pppi for professional printing.
Thread: bryce render test... | Forum: Bryce
Well, I just made a similar scene to the test scene shown above, and B5 was faster than B4 by a few seconds in OS9. And, it was faster by a few more seconds on OS X. Maybe I'm imagining the slowness... I guess my scenes are just getting more complex to render. Unless there are certain elements/textures/maps that drag down B5. But, the render tests are proof for me. It's mysterious, but I can't complain.
Thread: bryce render test... | Forum: Bryce
Yup. Bryce 5.1 But to be fair, X is a drag on my machine. It's great for listening to music, surfing the web, and light duty word processing, but OS X brings my machine to a crawl when graphics work is involved. I'll try to render with B5 while booted into OS9.2. That might speed me right up. I hope it does, because I've all but abandoned B5 because it's so slow, but maybe OS9 will do it. I'll let you know.
Thread: bryce render test... | Forum: Bryce
My G4 450MP renders about twice as fast in Bryce4. Even when I am running Bryce4 in the Classic Layer it's still faster. I don't think Bryce supports AltiVec. Alleycat, are you running Bryce5 in OS9 or X?
Privacy Notice
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Thread: Just practicing | Forum: Bryce