Here is an example of why :)

ICM = 3 Zhann = 2 Eyecon = 1

I'll give it a try thanks platanum.

Thanks for the input, funny though how folks are thinking this is for the more "traditional" role for a woman. The intent is actually for a fry cook or even a butchers apron. I appreciate all the comments and will adjust as appropriate. Once the fry cook apron is complete I'll work on the "traditional" style of apron.

Plat

I used Wings 3D to make the apron and the touch up was done in PS. The waist is wide due to the clothes underneath, but I agree the clothes does nothing for her figure. The shoulder straps need work, I'll do something about the belt, thanks for the input.

Since I brought this up yesterday I'm working on getting the shades of skin and lighting down for Amerasia. Using the key features of Tina and Sheron yesterday I have modified Amerasia slightly to add their characteristics. I even looked more closely at Bill O'Reilly last night on Fox, goodness he is ugly to look at the shading of the skin under the TV lights. I much preferred the young lady (can't remember her name) that was covering for Sheppard Smith. Now looking more closely even at pictures of Nicole Kidman I'm seeing unique characteristics of her face that I have not noticed before.

Thanks for all the feedback, it's good to know that I'm not the only one. Now if I can take what I have seen and create a descent piece of art I will be satisfied.

I never need an excuse to admire a woman I just need to remember to glance not gawk.

Platanum.

I'll check out DAZ thanks.

Very nice looking pieces. I know that I will be interested in possibly using some of your products... and I like the Jatex-3D for your brand name.

look for a Platanum Creations character (based on Judy) soon.

Graviton... by no means was I calling anyone specific a Prude it was a generalization much like your original statement. I'm sitting bored at work between trouble issues and thought I would partake of this little foray, obviously unaware that this is an habitual topic. However seeing the replies from some, my more 'pervy' type creations will not be as frequent as my 'prudish' ;) endeavors, since all I have posted is my first render. Well enough of every one's time, I'm just adding to the number of posts that this receives. Platanum

agreed joey. 'nuff said by me. I'm just a newb here.

Joey, perhaps my perceptions of others replies is different than yours, I do not see any defensive denial however there is acknowledgement of 'perviness' just some of us prefer a more subtle label ;) This is after all a forum of artists each with their own likes and dislikes.

It is all in the eye of the beholder. I would agree though that some out here (at least me) have a healthy imagination and can be considered 'slightly pervy' better than be thought of as a prude.

Patrica - 3 A_ - 2 RNKarenER - 1