Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 14 12:36 pm)
I think that most of the issues are in the lighting .... right now her face is shadowed, which means that the brightest and therefor most interesting thing in the image is the guys neck and that image on the wall over there. SOmehow I don't think thats what you had in mind .... The lighting as it lies on the bkg is fine, very dramtic with nice lights and darks. I think that if you put a couple dim lights above and behind the camera you can bring this image out a little better. You might want to experiment wih a light right in front of her face, but that could be tricky.
The poses are great. So are the background, clothes and textures. The sky could be have more drama maybe. And you might want to add a tiny reflection to that sword. Like a little cross/star-type reflection. You could do that in post. I'd look at the lighting too. And I'd raise her clenched fist so it's a bit more visible. It's a dramatic gesture, but doesn't catch the eye at first, since it kind of blends into her arm. But... if it was my scene... what I'd try is a really wild camera angle. Like from somewhere down near his right hand, with a wide lens, like 15mm, so she's really jumping down onto him. Or anyway, somewhere from below. Thing is, you'd lose a lot of the guy's pose, but it could be a nice alternative. But that's me. I like dramatic stuff. mac
I agree with KyReb, the set is too small. If these people stand up, they wouldn't be able to walk through those arches. They'd have to bend over and squeeze through. I would suggest moving the structure back and scaling it larger. Other than that, there's something going on in this image, not just someone standing staring into the camera. There's some sort of story happening here. Melanie
Maclean's point about the kickers left arm position is well taken and while we're on the subject of her pose, the upper body is almost perfectly vertical. I would prefer her body to lean back a little, maybe 15-25 degrees or so. To me that would convey the action/dynamics/motion of a flying kick better than the almost static upright position. The kickees pose is quite well done by the way. All the other comments about the lighting and scale are also well taken... My 2 cents Walter
Ditto, the lighting as per Lyrra. Ditto, the left arm as per maclean. Try the "squint" test or blur the picture, something to reduce the detail down to the basic levels of value and see where your eye goes. The left fist values are so close to the arm as the arm is close in value to the wall behind that it all melts together. There's no rule that every picture should have eye popping contrast. It's all about Your choice and there's a lot of looks to choose from. I'm working on a very similar composition at this very moment, although our content is Very different. So your question has been very "in my face" for the past few days. Right or wrong, I've chosen to focus most of my lighting to the front on the attacker and to get the camera as low as possible. But that's just how I'm solving my problem. Oh, and I don't believe that the set is too small but it is competing with your central characters for focus. I'll post my endevour soon. Good luck with yours.
I like the scene but I also get that 'something not right' niggle. I don't think the set is too small, you can see the woman's shadow on a pillar and that gives an idea of the scale. After looking at this for a while I noticed that the background sky gets brighter as you go down- implying the sun is setting/rising, but the shadows imply the sun is behind us. Maybe, subconciously, that's what was bugging me.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Content Advisory! This message contains violence