Thu, Jan 9, 7:51 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Photography

All Forums

Welcome to the Photography Forum

Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon

Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Dec 31 10:42 am)




Subject: New Digital Cameras

Syyd opened this issue on Jan 07, 2001 · 12 posts
Back to Forum Print
Syyd ( ) posted Sun, 07 January 2001 at 5:08 PM · edited Thu, 09 January 2025 at 7:41 AM

Quite curious to know if anyone has a nay or say on a Nikon Coolpix 990, or any other camera in this price range...want a decent digital camera in the prosumer range. Syyd

CharlieBrown ( ) posted Thu, 11 January 2001 at 12:03 PM

Syyd, you might want to check out MaximumPC (www.maximumpc.com). They reviewed three of the newer digital cameras in the Feb. issue, and I THINK the Coolpix 990 was one of them (the issue is at home so I can't check right now).

Kurka ( ) posted Sat, 13 January 2001 at 9:52 PM

I bought the Kodak DC-4800 and I'm very pleased with it. Lots of control, good image quality.

wyrwulf ( ) posted Sat, 13 January 2001 at 10:23 PM

Make sure to try the camera out before you buy it. I jumped the gun a couple of years ago and bought a Kodak DC 260. It was top of the line, but I didn't try it at the store. It eats batteries, and is very slow in processing pictures. I can only take two shots in succession, then I have to wait about a minute for the camera to finish "processing pictures". I don't know if their newer ones are any better.

Kurka ( ) posted Sun, 14 January 2001 at 9:25 AM

The DC-4800's batteries last for about 250 shots if you don't use the LCD, about 80 to 100 using it all the time. and processes the pics in about 5 sec, but you can take pics in succession since it has a 16mb cache.

ARADTech ( ) posted Sun, 21 January 2001 at 10:17 AM

I suggest the Coolpix 950 myself it is what I use. I think the 990 has some low light issues that are not in the 950. I love my 950 and of course you cannot beat the Nikor len's they still make the best in the world. Peace and Creativity Chris

soapy ( ) posted Tue, 23 January 2001 at 6:23 PM

I would also check out the Canon G1 it likes like a really good little camera.

 Compact Soapy 

Spike ( ) posted Thu, 22 February 2001 at 5:26 PM

I have the olympus 3030 and love it, It is old now but I still think it does ok. What are the pixels of some of the ones listed here?

You can't call it work if you love it... Zen Tambour
 

agate88 ( ) posted Fri, 23 February 2001 at 10:17 AM

I guess I'd like to get a digital camera, because it can get the shots into the computer pronto, but I'm still using my good ole Canon T1 35mm and scanning in the stuff. Or rent a small format camera and scan in the transparency. Although I haven't had time to keep up with the advances in quality and speed. Could someone maybe post some examples of the cameras they like? Thanks!

Lisas_Botanicals ( ) posted Fri, 23 February 2001 at 12:10 PM

I just bought an HP C500 2 Megapixel. So far I'm pretty pleased with the photo quality, however I haven't shot much more than Lionel Trains that I'm selling for my dad on ebay. I bought it after seeing a review on ZDTV comparing five affordable/quality cameras. The top was the Olympus D490 but they said the photo quality of the HP was just as good.

Spike ( ) posted Fri, 23 February 2001 at 12:35 PM

I have found that anything less then 3.34 meg is to small for 8X10 prints.

You can't call it work if you love it... Zen Tambour
 

Kurka ( ) posted Fri, 23 February 2001 at 6:41 PM

Attached Link: http://www.charm.net/~mchaney/imaging/index.html

2 megapixels is fine. Use Qimage Pro. It's dirt cheap, has a 30 day demo, and does a wonderfull job of print interpolation.

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.