Forum Coordinators: RedPhantom
Poser - OFFICIAL F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 13 11:02 am)
Also uncheck visible in raytracing and casts shadows.
If an object is not visible in camera or raytracing (thus invisible to IDL, reflections, refractions) and cannot cast a shadow, then it has 0 impact on the render. It is only seen in pose room.
Note! Visible in camera is a recent addition to Poser. If you're one of those vendors living in a Poser 5 + Daz world, you're out of luck.
Renderosity forum reply notifications are wonky. If I read a follow-up in a thread, but I don't myself reply, then notifications no longer happen AT ALL on that thread. So if I seem to be ignoring a question, that's why. (Updated September 23, 2019)
Quote - Also uncheck visible in raytracing and casts shadows.
In earlier versions which lack the 'visible in camera' option, the steps above are sufficient as long as you always render using raytracing. I imagine most people do, but I have no data to support that - so you may not want to risk it for a commercial product.
I use one of the wireframe object display style modes, in such cases. Depending on context, that may or may not help make the object more evident in the workspace. :unsure:
===========================sigline======================================================
Cage can be an opinionated jerk who posts without thinking. He apologizes for this. He's honestly not trying to be a turkeyhead.
Cage had some freebies, compatible with Poser 11 and below. His Python scripts were saved at archive.org, along with the rest of the Morphography site, where they were hosted.
Thank you, everbody! You are all awesome, but PhilC is the most awesome this time, because that totally worked. Thanks, Phil!
I set visibleInRender to 0 for all occurences of it in my .cr2 file and now I see it in my preview, but not in the render. BTW, I did have to set casts shadows to false as well.
Also, I do have an older version of Poser (Pro 2012), so the 'visible in camera' mentioned above was not available to me.
Thanks again,
-digitani
Check out my website: http://www.digitani.com
Phil is always the most awesome. Even his facial hair is awesome. :D>
visibleInRender goes back at least to Poser 4 so should be available to anybody.
For Pythonheads: actor.SetVisibleInRender( 0 ) will achieve this. I leave it as an exercise for the reader to work out how to turn it back on again. ;)
what's wrong with just going into the parameters tab in poser and clicking on properties and making the prop invisible? did you try that? I know it is basic but maybe he doesn't know this method?
I aim to update it about once a month. Oh, and it's free!
Quote - what's wrong with just going into the parameters tab in poser and clicking on properties and making the prop invisible? did you try that? I know it is basic but maybe he doesn't know this method?
What's wrong is it would not be visible if you make it invisible. The stated requirement is that it be visible in the posing room.
Quote - I want the user to be able to see it when working in the posing room
The original question was basically asking how to make it invisible in the render only, because if you make it generally invisible, then it's invisible in the posing room, too, and that is not desirable.
Renderosity forum reply notifications are wonky. If I read a follow-up in a thread, but I don't myself reply, then notifications no longer happen AT ALL on that thread. So if I seem to be ignoring a question, that's why. (Updated September 23, 2019)
well wouldn't he then just make it invisible when he's finished posing and is ready to render?
I aim to update it about once a month. Oh, and it's free!
The OP is asking how to avoid what you're suggesting the user be forced to do.
It's like you go to the doctor and complain that it hurts to lift your arm, and the doctor says don't lift it, then.
Renderosity forum reply notifications are wonky. If I read a follow-up in a thread, but I don't myself reply, then notifications no longer happen AT ALL on that thread. So if I seem to be ignoring a question, that's why. (Updated September 23, 2019)
I just re read his original post and I have to say it is a little ambigous. He may be meaning exactly what you say because he doesn't know how easy it is to turn objects on and off.
But anyway he now has two methods he can use depending what he wants to do. And he could well be a beginner.
I aim to update it about once a month. Oh, and it's free!
Hey, estherau, thanks so much for your input, but Bagginsbill was right. I'm developing a tool that I want to distribute, and I want it to be as easy to use as possible, so I don't want to tell the users that they have to make the prop-based controls invisible manually before rendering. I still appreciate your help, though. :-)
EnglishBob, I am a pythonhead, so thanks for that little tidbit as well.
-digitani
Check out my website: http://www.digitani.com
oh okay. hope it works okay.
I aim to update it about once a month. Oh, and it's free!
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
I have a prop that is only there for interacting with my script, and I want the user to be able to see it when working in the posing room, but I don't want it to show in the render. Is there any way to do this?
I have tried applying a totally transparent material, and that does hide it in the render, but it is very hard to see it in the posing room.
Check out my website: http://www.digitani.com