Forum Moderators: Lobo3433
3D Modeling F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 10 9:34 pm)
Freeware 3D Modeling Software Links:
Blender | Trimble Sketchup | Wings 3D | Anim8or | Metasequoia | Clara IO (Browser-based 3d modeler)
Check out the MarketPlace Wishing Well, as a content creator's resource for your next project.
"What 3D Program Should I buy?" Not one person here can really tell you what's best for you, as everyone has their own taste in workflow. Try the demo or learning edition of the program you're interested in, this is the only way to find out which programs you like.
I believe Sculptris only works with tris. (You know... "sculpt-tris"?)
So unless your mesh is starting out as a triangulated one, you may have a doubling or so of polycount.
If you have a mesh made of tris, you should be able to skip to paint w/o having more polys added. (You can also modify a mesh without adding polys to some extent by having the detail slider set to 0 as well.)
Your friendly neighborhood Wings3D nut.
Also feel free to browse my freebies at ShareCG.
There might be something worth downloading.
Quote -
So unless your mesh is starting out as a triangulated one, you may have a doubling or so of polycount.
Actually this is wrong. You will get more faces, but tri-count stays the same, no matter if your mesh is quad or tri. Every mesh is made out of triangles, just most apps hide them because quads are easier to work with, but quads are still made out of 2 triangles. Thus converting mesh will not change anything
It's pretty obvious that the UV layout will change if you change from quads to tris. What he meant is that the poly count still stays the same. However, if you've already layed out the UV's (and even if you haven't) then the shells won't change shape (or shouldn't at least) just the look of them. Thus further enforcing the point that nothing really changes.
It's true that quads are pairs of tris and handled that way at some level. But in a lot of software, what happens when you split quads into tris, it still doubles the effective (as opposed to actual) polycount. It can also do things to vertex and edge order on an .obj, so any morphs and things of that nature end up broken, and that means starting all over from square one.
Your friendly neighborhood Wings3D nut.
Also feel free to browse my freebies at ShareCG.
There might be something worth downloading.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Looking to invest in 3D painting software, affordable software. Blacksmith uses an outdated form of cloning where in I'm looking for textured projection painting like Sculptris offers.
I wrote to 3D Coat about a week ago and no response so it's a bit of a red flag and decided to pry around elsewhere.
Blender's paint features are far too difficult to use properly.
So Sculptris pretty much does what I want but I'm afraid that any imported models in to Sculptris are going to become poly heavy which is the case if you're importing for sculpting.
What I'm wondering is that, if I skip the sculpting section and take the model directly to paint, will Sculptris still raise the meshes poly count?