11 threads found!
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Reply |
---|---|---|---|---|
ficticious | 10 | 198 | ||
ficticious | 2 | 79 | ||
ficticious | 11 | 177 | ||
ficticious | 21 | 501 | ||
ficticious | 4 | 98 | ||
ficticious | 12 | 215 | ||
ficticious | 22 | 332 | ||
ficticious | 5 | 94 | ||
ficticious | 3 | 55 | ||
ficticious | 2 | 88 | ||
ficticious | 2 | 61 |
267 comments found!
search "royalty free" on the net, and you should find a bunch. Places like gettyimages.com and whatnot. Problem is they're usually quite watermarked. Free stuff is hard to come by dude.
Thread: I changed my mind | Forum: Photoshop
well, in the end i care not either way cuz i don't check the galleries anyways, nevermind upload to'em. and work will still get "buried", just take another hour or two to do so is all.
Thread: I changed my mind | Forum: Photoshop
I'd like to say once again that a PS specific gallery is unwarranted in my opinion. There isn't any over crowding, especially compared to other galleries. At the moment, us non 3D users are a big cohesive happy family. Splitting it apart would be like splitting worldbuilder, terragen, mojoworld and Vue D'Esprit apart. There isn't a humoungous set of users for each program like there is for Bryce, and I always thought in terms of galleries, Terrain Generation would be better. You needn't know what program the work was done in to critique it, they are all similar in many ways, and the galleries would probably get more viewers if they were put together. If you split up photoshop and separate it from the rest, there wont be any reason for not making a PSP, Freehand, Illustrator, GIMP, etc galleries, and if that happened, you'll lose viewership, gauranteed. you will still have the same useless "Cool stuff" comments, you'll just get less of them. This is why we have indiividual forums, for proper discussion and critiquing of work, and its also program specific (to a large degree). I dont see any need for a specific gallery. If anytthing, you'll just get postworked Posertits in there anyways.
Thread: My turn for a vacation... (off-topic) | Forum: Photography
Thread: Time for a DazStudio forum? | Forum: Community Center
Thread: Last Post Ever From My "Point & Click" Digital! | Forum: Photography
speaking of getting laid, i hope you got yerself a nice loooong telephoto lens, have the best of both worlds that way... heh heh
Thread: Photoshop 7.0 to 7.01 | Forum: Photoshop
Thread: Photoshop 7.0 to 7.01 | Forum: Photoshop
Thread: Where can I find this | Forum: Photoshop
Thread: Saving a layer as an image and an alpha channel. | Forum: Photoshop
Thread: And a little more color | Forum: Photography
a few months ago, i found an old flash attachment in my dad's old dresser drawer. I remembered it not really working unless plugged into the wall, and also wondered bout what buttons did what. I finally figure out how to set the flash off by hand, so what do I do? I hold the flash right up against my eyes, a little closer to the left than the right, and pres the button. This blinding lflash of light hits me... the scary thing was the blinding flash didn't go away. Knowing this was a flash, i started to wonder why I couldn't f'in see a thing, everything complete,ly whited out, I mean I literally couldn't see a damn thing. 10 minutes later, my right eye starts giving in, and i can sorta see things, but its all in a washed out green tint, no other colours, the left eye is still blind, though not white anymore, kinda offwhite or greyish. 10 minutes after that I can almost see normally out of my right eye, and my left eye is somewhat better, I can see shapes and shadows. About 45 minutes later, my sight returned to normal entirely. I honestly could never say what I was thinking. I was reminded of this from your last sentence... ry
Thread: the fans | Forum: Photography
the last one (my fav of the 3) has this strange feel of 1970's style colour tones to it, kind of like the way tv shows and print work looked back then, though how i should know is byond me, born in '82... If I were to change something, I'd say in the last one, the green in the trees is the only thing that doesn't remind me of the 70's, it'd need to be lighter, and more muted, kinda like the green of US bills (i think, I'm canadian here, so Im trying to remember , and my memory paints the colour Im lookin for, like a summer grass green that's in a slight need of a watering. Not dead, just thirsty.... or something).
Thread: And a little more color | Forum: Photography
mainly the refraction of the yellow light in certain places as well, that's what makes it really tick.
Thread: And a little more color | Forum: Photography
the first has a strange apocalyptic feel to it, kind of like the bridge of a spaceship or something, and they're going into "CODE PURPLE!! CODE PURPLE!!!, or mayhaps CODE BLUE!!! I can't decide what the colour is, my eyes are having a little bit of a sissyfight over it... first is the stronger of the two for me. The second lacks the overall sharpness of the first, and is a lot more muted. Side by side I wouldn't put'em together. The contrast of the yellow lights with the blue in the first works verrrrry well though....
Thread: Second Dragon | Forum: Photography
the girl's jacket, the purple/magneta one, it takes all the attention in this one. The resto f the colours are somewhat muted in comparison to the jacket, and the purple "jumps off" before the yellow does (to me at least, yellow seems to be the colder of the two, the purple being the "warmer/hotter). the dragon is hella cool, but it also supports the eye going to the purple jacket girl, it completes the frame around her pretty much. I dunno, not my cup o tea this one, but that's just me.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Thread: photos for textures | Forum: Photography