Not sure if it's just me, but I bought something yesterday with $ 6.- instore credit (no further payment needed) and today with a $ 5.- Gift certificate, $ 1.17 Instore credit and a paypal payment of $ 0.58 No "$ 3.50 minimum" it seems?!?

Problem was solved - thanks :)

Thanks.. I'll try that :)

Well, it helps to make customers either buy more or less than they intended. They either add another product to the shopping cart or they don't buy the item they intended to buy... For me this situation happens a lot, with gift cards or the x% off coupons. And yes, it's an utterly stupid restriction...

Thursday now... 130 or so views... still no "official" answer?

I was told - with the ban message - that I should ask the censors before putting up a picture in the gallery if it would be "safe" or not. If it would also take a couple of days to get an answer, I don't think that would really be an option...

Torquinox posted at 5:24AM Wed, 24 April 2019 - #4350590

You're not supposed to go through the list. It was rhetorical. Droll humor lost in translation. Official response MIA. My unofficial answer is, avoid pointy or curved fruits and vegetables and don't get banned.

Ah, no... no humor was lost... except maybe in my answer, which was what I think of as "funny" ^^ And I guess I will not only avoinf pointy fruits and vegetables, but everything pointy, whatever material it may be and adding to that no licking at all. Not even for the utterly funny "I licked a lamppost in the freezing cold and my tongue got stuck" scene. As I wrote earlier... lots of fluffy bunnies, but without carrots... ^^

TheDarkerSideOfArt posted at 2:03PM Tue, 23 April 2019 - #4350546

Maybe their vegan? Didnt like the usage of the carrot? So removed it? Who knows

Well, "They" should know... and be able to explain the reason, instead of just removing it with a remark to the "Terms of Service" in which Carrots aren't even mentioned.

Torquinox posted at 2:03PM Tue, 23 April 2019 - #4350549

@T0mcat00: Maybe the carrot was too suggestive. It might be best to avoid pointy or curved fruits and vegetables. Are bananas, carrots, cucumbers, zucchinis and other related squash forbidden? No idea. Sorry that happened to you. Try not to get banned.

Yeah, carrots are totally suggestive... every time when I'm at the supermarket and go past the vegetables and I see a carrot I think "Oh my, doesn't that look exactly like a male reproduction organ?" And no, I will not go through the test of which vegetables are allowed to be licked by Rendo Censorship Rules... too risky... that's the reason why I made this post to get a definitive answer about what would be lickable within the rules (and other stuff.. see post #1)

Torquinox posted at 10:01AM Tue, 23 April 2019 - #4350534

I agree, it's a ridiculous situation. Banal pinup nudes are fine here. Anything more will be easier to show on a site with looser terms of service.

Well, a nude girl licking a carrot like it was an ice cream cone is - in my not so humble opinion - about as banal a pinup as can be.. still it got removed. I wonder what would have happened if I had her biting into a sausage... with some mustart squirting out of her mouth...

To me it seems, as if these censors have some severe problems, seeing dirty things where there aren't really any. "Oooooh... that carrot looks somehow like a male reproduction organ.. better censor it away before some helpless child sees it... doesn't matter that it's hidden behind a nudity tag." facepalm

Khai-J-Bach posted at 7:03AM Tue, 23 April 2019 - #4350529

Welcome to confusion central. Its all subjective to the reviewer to start off with. So while one would say it's fine, another will so no it's against the rules

So good luck.

(Remember we live in a society where you can watch someone being graphically torn apart (the saw movies), shot (lethal weapon anyone?) But to see a naked body, even when it does not exist , as in polygons, is a taboo and no no.

Yeah, I guess me being german and living in Germany is part of the problem. I also guess nothing what I have posted and what has been censored would raise an eyebrow around here. Fun fact: some bare boobs (or even full nudity, as long as male/female reproduction organs aren't visibly aroused) would be no reason for people to faint when on a magazine cover, even when they would be visible for kids. Stuff like that can be seen regular on TV even in the afternoon program. Saw movies though are regulated hard and get a "18 upwards" advisory or would be heavily edited.

Ah, thank You... didn't know that. As it's not so long 'til the first Wednesday Newsletter it's easy to be patient ?

No problem... Grab Bag is a gamble system and sometimes you don't win ;)

Small problem with my order #113188676

I received the Material ADDON for the Alion Suit (https://www.renderosity.com/mod/bcs/?ViewProduct=124155) through the Grab Bag. As I don't own the Alion Suit and also don't use G8F yet, this seems like a waste of a really great looking product to me. As it is a texture set for a G8F geoshell I'm not sure if I would be able to find a way to use it on a G3F geoshell or a G3F bodysuit... So would it be possible to exchange this product for any of https://www.renderosity.com/mod/bcs/to-dye-for---universal-iray-shaders/119858 or https://www.renderosity.com/mod/bcs/male-emotions-for-genesis-8/122873 or https://www.renderosity.com/mod/bcs/flirty-girl-poses-for-g3f-and-g8f/123037

Or if there is a way to use the addon's textures on a G3F, please give me a hint....

l.croft posted at 7:26PM Sun, 18 March 2018 - #4326284

Awesome entries so far! ? This render is supposed to be Lara just arriving home after an adventure and Winston has brought her some refreshments ?

Great picture... but... a hamburger??? Shouldn't that rather be a cucumber or roastbeef sandwich? ^^

Soon she will be the next Lara Croft.

Could you describe in more detail which effect you want to achieve? When aiming just for the skirt to be raised, I would go for the following:

1. Use timeline with 60 as upper value 1a. at 0 have the figure in a slightly modified bas position, with arms to the sides and the feet close to each other 1b. have the cylinder below of the feet
2. at 30 put the cylinder upwards a bit higher than the position needed to move the skirt up as far as you want 2a. don't change anything of the female's position - yet
3. at 60 move the cylinder down again and set the female's legs into the position you want them to be 3b. move the arms into the needed position after the simulation

I have not tried it (but I think I will...) but doing it this way those problematic "double collisions" should be avoided.

Another option would be doing the simulation with the figure staying in the basic position - with feet close to each other - and using only primitives as replacements for those parts of her body, that are supposed to interact with the skirt and moving her limbs into the correct positions after (!) the simulation. In my - limitied - experience, dForce works way better when only primitives are involved.