i dont hate all added functions just because they come from other programs,  not only that, when you upen up sculpt mode, it doesnt say zbrush emulator, or sharpconstruct, the feature is made for blender.  its not linking one program to another that i object to,  its using "morphing" abilities in blender designed for poser charachters.

i think there were two actualy. 

i noticed that the size of my picture was not correct. it was 500100 rather than 570100, here is an updated pic

ok, i like the rotating banner idea, but i still stand by my view that banners that are already the headers for people websites should not go on as a banner.

lets not get too fancy now.  btw, this time we have a thread, we should make it so that nobody's website's banner can be a submission,  the submissions should be original and for the purpose. 

i have uploaded something, my cornell box with the odd looking glasses, but i uploaded it before they changed how free stuff worked, and then the site i had used to host it closed down(i think, or they just dropped my file).  if you want it or any of my other free stuff you can go to my website.

modeling clothes is something completely different.  not only that, when you sell something, the tool that you use to create it becomes something slightly more proffesional.  this would not applicable to poser.  The babie doll is not a proffesional item,  the machinery to make its clothes is.  You would not use the machinery used to make its clothes to play with it would you? 

which is exactly why i do not like the idea of linking blender to poser.  allowing poser morphs in blender would just make it feel less profesional.  one of the things i happen to love about blender is it's feel of proffesionality, as well as the quality of the art or graphics being produced by it right now.  i just dont feel that by creating a poser script you will be encouraging a proffesional enviroment, especialy one that allows poser functionality to happen in blender.  i dont think it should be hard to make art, or that an artist should know everything about everything, infact most artists that i know dont, its just that poser is not an artistic program, its a doll house with dolls.

.obj! the blender .obj importer is one of it's best, i am pretty sure i got an indigo material scene into blender that was made in max using .obj

.obj importer and exporter that doesnt reorder verticies???? this could be so incredibly usefull!

your oppinion as a hobbyist should not be discounted, hobbiests practicaly rule the publicly viewable 3d world.  blender is a free program and thus most of its users are hobbyests,  poser, well i am pretty sure the vast majority of thoes users are hobbyists as well

odd, i have never seen them used.  maybe you could name a few commercials/tv shows

are you sure poser is not a daz clone???  i dont have as many objections to what is coming out of daz as to what is coming out of poser.

its more that the originality of art coming from poser is decreasing on such a high level and its very hard to create anything realy original in poser when you start out working with the same model everybody else uses, and use textures and clothes that other people have made. I thaught poser was 99 dollars.  i guess i was wrong.   When i paid for animation master 2 years ago, it was 250, and i have no commercial use for it.  when was the last thing you have seen on tv made with poser?  last commercial?  last movie? even a billboard.  all of them use maya, lightwave, 3ds max, cinema 4d, softimage xsi and houdini, and somewhat more increasingly, blender.  for more industrial uses there is autocad, 3ds max, and rino.  

cool script, but no offense or anything, but dont you  think its just more worth your while to program the script to act on models created nativly in blender, just as an easier way to do facial morphs?  say for example, you define a closed loop as the mouth and another for eyebrows and so on, you could program your script to act apon thoes.  i think that would be much more original and much cooler.  

personaly,  it is my oppinion that blender has a unique degree of creativity from its users.  in other applications, this has been corrupted due poser's almost plajoristic ease of use.  Due to poser, i am seeing fewer and fewer artists with knowledge of how to author desent materials, little knowlege of render process, and even less knoledge of modeling and topology.  Poser has virtualy no commercial use compared other applications.  I find that the most satisfying work of art is one created on one's own and when that work of art is guilt free.