12 threads found!
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Reply |
---|---|---|---|---|
Towal | 8 | 67 | ||
Towal | 4 | 128 | ||
Towal | 5 | 170 | ||
Towal | 17 | 403 | ||
Towal | 15 | 373 | ||
Towal | 7 | 168 | ||
Towal | 5 | 167 | ||
Towal | 5 | 118 | ||
Towal | 7 | 290 | ||
Towal | 10 | 163 | ||
Towal | 20 | 285 | ||
Towal | 14 | 236 |
120 comments found!
We do our best to apply these fairly and consistently.
That's the best laugh I have had in days :)
Thread: Everything but Poser in the Poser forum | Forum: Community Center
Thread: Everything but Poser in the Poser forum | Forum: Community Center
I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for her to answer why it's such a huge issue for her. I am beginning to think that the PTB just have their very own pet Troll.
I haven't been here as long as some of you, but in the time I have, I have seen enough occasions of starting threads purposely baiting folks (not to mention the number of OT posts Herself has made) or baiting in other threads only to get people worked up and then have her post "well I'm outta here". Of course, by then the thread has taken on a new life.
Thread: Attention all Poser forum members | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
ah well that makes more sense then. I didn't realize there was more than one version. I believe the book is called Sorcerer's Stone over here too. I haven't read any of them yet.
Thread: Attention all Poser forum members | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Attached Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0241527/
Well ok, but my copy of the movie is called Harry Potter and the Scorcer's Stone (see link) and they refer to it as the Sorcerer's stone in the movie as well /shrugThread: Attention all Poser forum members | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Voldemort is the "bad guy" in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. They refer to him as He Who Must Not Be Named.
Thread: How to legally post OT announcements | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
A new person would be hard pressed to figure out where the Poser information is hidden when there is so much bickering going on.
I'm fairly certain that anyone with an IQ slightly higher than a turnip can figure out what it related to Poser and what is OT (usually just from the post title, but even then from what I have seen here people are fairly good about marking OT as OT).
A lot of people do not visit the OT forum (I do not unless something gets moved). When someone wants their friends/colleagues to see something they will likely post where those people hang out.
Pretty soon we will be seeing "Please go see my OT post in the OT forum" so people can let the people they want to see their post know where they posted it.
Why is it any harder to skip on by OT than it is to skip by the Poser 5 stuff when you only have Poser 4. Not every thread is going to be of interest to every person reading the board period.
What is so hard about just skipping things that don't interest you (you being general here not directing this at any one person).
Thread: Attention all Poser forum members | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
ding ding ding...2 points to Caly. That is currently my favorite movie. I watch it at least once a day ;)
I'm unclear on something in the ToS post as well. Are all "violations" going to be treated in the same manner?
For example am I going to get a warning for posting something not directly related to poser in this thread?
On the upside if posting OT here now is indeed a warnable (is that a word) offense likely She Who Must Not Be Named will get 3 violations before most of the rest of us...unless of course she has immunity for all infractions from the PTB.
Thread: Attention all Poser forum members | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Xoconostle said: There is someone, no names please, who seriously needs to take a good look in the mirror and cut the pretentious self-righteous condescending. It's disgusting and hypocritical, laughably so, and more importantly, does nothing to help the situation that this certain person criticizes. Quite the opposite.
I have been watching this thread and biting my tongue. Thank you for stating what it appears I was not alone in thinking.
BTW, if you watch the other forums at all (like community center for example) you might notice that the ONE squeeky wheel seems to provide a lot of grease for things that happen in the poser forum.
I haven't been around for long so I don't know the history and dynamics of that, but it sure makes me go hmmmmmm.
OT doesn't bother me because I am capable of just skipping past the threads I do not wish to read. For example, I do not have poser 5 so I skip those threads as well. I certainly don't expect the poser forum to be split into P4, PPP, and P5 just because I'm incapable of skipping threads that do not pertain to something of interest to me.
If She Who Must Not Be Named (2 points if you can tell me what movie that is from) doesn't like the way things are run instead of dragging down the entire community perhaps she should start her own board and run it in any draconian way she sees fit and leave the rest of us adults to take care of ourselves here without all the unnecessary babysitting and hand slapping.
Thread: ~~~January Poser Forum Challenge.. VOTE HERE!~~~ | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Thread: Who let the dogs out? | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Thread: Who let the dogs out? | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Can someone confirm exactly what you need to buy to get all the stuff for the dog? Do I need the bundle pack and the starter pack or just the bundle or ? ? ?. I found the way they have it split up/described kinda confusing :(
Thread: BOYCOTT THEM | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Thread: BOYCOTT THEM | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Bruce,
Thank you again for hanging in there ;) I can't answer your question on what I might consider an extreme bondage pose because I haven't seen any here. I don't find bondage in and of itself disturbing as long as it's 2 (or more) consenting people. I suspect that a bondage scene might not have as much in the "grey" area as some of this other stuff simply because of the nature of the topic.
2 people being naked and near each other would give most people the illusion that something sexual is going to happen, just happened or might happen. Again, I don't care, but I think a little more direction on what is or is not ok would go a long way toward resolving this type of arguement.
If we look at it realistically people doing NVIATWAS are most likely doing it for the sexual aspect vs some great adoration of the human body. I do nudes/scantily clad women/provocative posed models etc, but I don't post them here because I want my non nude stuff to get a few viewings ;) Mostly I do them because I have fun dressing the models up...interactive Barbie of sorts. A learn a lot from doing that type of render that I can then apply to what I consider more "serious" work.
I'm not saying people who do nudes are not artists or are a lesser grade of artist. I have seen some beautiful nudes in the galleries (one of my favorite images is a nude waves at April). I am speaking for me personally that I don't consider my doing them serious. I do them for fun and to play around. That may change in the future after I have had the program for longer and am more experienced.
I am more than happy to simply skip images or threads that do not interest me. I do not want to only have images that I find appealing in the galleries..how boring that would be. That is a different issue than what I am trying to address with the TOS thing.
See you tomorrow (hopefully no one locks this in the meantime)
Towal
Thread: BOYCOTT THEM | Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL
Again from the TOS:
No Explicit sexual content [No manipulation of breasts/nipples/ no sexual situations/ no implied sexual acts/ no extreme or explicit S&M bondage situations/ no lewd or obscene sexual references]
I can tell you that as I said before I do not hang out with my female (or male) friends naked or scantily clad with them touching my breasts or rear and consider that a normal daily activity. You can't say that it's not a sexual situation to have 2 naked people touching each others "private" parts. Thomas said straight out that touching anothers "parts" was likely to get us right back here, yet when I posted several images showing exactly that instead of addressing what he said (when I even specifically asked) he locked the thread for being Off Topic.
You said "Sexual scenes in and of them selves are not against the TOS..." Ok great! Reading the TOS that honestly doesn't seem to be the case. Can you please give an example of a sexual scene that would be allowed aside from a picture in which the 2 or more models just happen to be naked? I know nudity is allowed, but that is different than a sexual scene, at least IMO.
I want to thank you again for responding to this thread in a rational manner and actually trying to resolve it and let us know that our opinions are actually being considered vs just swept away.
Towal
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Thread: Women in torture cages? - freestuff | Forum: Community Center