EldritchCellar posted at 6:28AM Sat, 25 April 2020 - #4386217

Logan's Run? Hey, remember that skimpy getup that Jenny Agutter was wearing in that?

Trivia note: she HATED that costume.

Many, many thanks. :-)

@ Raindroptheelf... look at my response directly above yours. To be searingly blunt, the profit margin around here for most vendors is pretty thin in the first place. This health crisis is going to make it worse, and we may lose a lot of them in the process. Our vendors have been damn good about keeping prices down for their customers. Now maybe it's time we returned the favour. If you have some other idea how that can be accomplished, put it out there.

Miss B posted at 11:50PM Thu, 02 April 2020 - #4385268

SeanMartin posted at 11:10PM Thu, 02 April 2020 - #4385253

It's a holdover from when LH was just a morph of LF. That roundness was originally filled with LF's breasts.

Actually, I've hated LF's rounded armholes from the get-go for the same reason. With her arms down, it never looks like her armholes are flattened as they are in real life, and my breasts are not in any way near/under my armpits, and I don't think LF's are either.

Remember, we're talking about Poser breasts here. They have a way of defying physics of all sorts. LOL

Miss B posted at 6:19PM Thu, 02 April 2020 - #4385235

Earl, that's not an error, or something wrong. It's how Gabe modeled La Femme and L'Homme.

That said, I don't like the obvious roundness of their armpits, and have yet to figure out how to adjust the dials to what I'm used to seeing. Whether or not they were modeled that way to make things easier for content creators to make blouses and dresses for La Femme, and shirts for L'Homme fit better, especially dynamic clothing, I can't say, but it's the only thing I can think of.

It's a holdover from when LH was just a morph of LF. That roundness was originally filled with LF's breasts.

Were these normal times, I would agree with you, but sadly they're not. We're going to lose a lot of vendors because their sales simply wont be enough to make it viable anymore. Yes, the exported product — whatever it might be — will be "inferior", but as long as the customer knows this in advance and is charged accordingly, I sense that most here would be willing to make the sacrifice to ensure that vendors such as yourself are still here when this is all over. I know I would have zero problems buying something that would be of lesser quality if it kept some of these good folk afloat — and that to me anyway should be the priority. When this is over, we can revisit some of them, if the market dictates as such, but for now, let's make sure you good ladies and gentlemen are still here to do it. :-)

ockham posted at 9:57AM Wed, 01 April 2020 - #4385094

But why do they need both Downloads AND Purchases? Downloads was an earlier version of the same nonsense. Now we have two unremovable nonsenses cluttering up the list.

No idea, but honestly, is it truly that big a deal?

Lotsa good stuff in the transportation content that you download separately. Kudos to the merchants for all this!

mmandala posted at 11:18PM Mon, 30 March 2020 - #4384899

I'm drawing a blank, but what's the method by which you re-link a runtime library? Installed the latest version (11.3 on a Mac) and I don't see any content libraries.

Open the Library window. At the top, you'll see a plus and a negative sign. Click the plus and direct it to the runtime you want to attach.

At the risk of being in the minority, I dont find them that big of a deal, honestly. I can click them closed easily enough. Face it: it's little things like this that ensure places like Rosity weather the coming financial crisis that's going to hit everyone pretty hard. In that regard, I have no issue with letting it go up so Rosity makes a bit off it, then closing it down so I dont have to see it.

I'm hoping they address the seemingly random crash when you try to access the Materials room.

Some postwork, of course, but not as much as you might think.

And the video link disappeared...

https://youtu.be/fwMLc1r-UxQ?t=1137

Many thanks!! Great work all around!

Just as an example of what's possible with these ancient meshes, my goto, as I noted above, is Kyle 1.5. It's another ten-year-old mesh — maybe more, actually. But if you work with it, just using what Redspark put in there, this is what you can get.

You just have to put in the work to find it. Not everything needs to be recreated from Square Zero when we havent really even examined what our current stuff is capable of.