Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon
Community Center F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Sep 28 10:18 am)
I've attached a screenshot of what I've been seeing with multiple images, unlike with PJF's script changes, the rest of the page doesn't resize to fit the larger image.
________________________________________________________________
If you're joking that's just cruel, but if you're being sarcastic, that's even worse.
Ah, it is related to Firefox, and it does happen in Firefox with my altered CSS.
Now I feel like a complete prat :-D. (see - it's still the real me, Ironbear)
(That reminds me, I must uninstall Firefox and start again with it. I made some 'speed-up' alterations to it suggested on a thread here somewhere and it's never worked properly since. That's why I've reverted to IE)
Aww, Nic.....Thank you!!!
I wasn't bothered a great deal by it because it does show the image behind it. And I could switch to IE, but my computer hates it for some reason. The few minutes it took me to check it in IE, my browser froze on me. LOL So it's really nice to know that it's getting fixed for Firefox. I love my Firefox! grin
Thank you again!!!
Janet
I am I am. very proud. And I still think you're a pod person. Just a pod person that's a complete prat. ;]p~
"I am a good person now and it feels... well, pretty much the same as I felt before (except that the headaches have gone away now that I'm not wearing control top pantyhose on my head anymore)"
Abuse! Ban him, somebody!
pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod
pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod
pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod
pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod
pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod-pod
I just looked at about 12 diffrerent images in bryce/cinema/vue galleries - it varies whether the image is full left or offset. The ones with offset seem to hyave the off set frame centered on the page as though it was going to be a 700px wide resample image displayed.
Pass no temptation lightly by, for one never knows when it may pass again!
Just meant to post my big "THANK YOU!" for the options provided!
I was following this issue and believed "options" would be the best solution, as many have asked for in the threads. So I'm really happy You did listen and completely kept up to our hopes and trust!
Excellent work!!!!!
Regards,
Stefano
Actually, the one anoying thing in the past was people uploading these 500kB images that could easily have been compressed to about 100MB, without sacrificing pixel size and pixel quality. There is no reason why a typical 600 x 800 pixel image should be more than 120kB, and still look good and sharp.
"An Example is worth Ten Thousand Words"
Quote - Actually, the one anoying thing in the past was people uploading these 500kB images that could easily have been compressed to about 100MB, without sacrificing pixel size and pixel quality. There is no reason why a typical 600 x 800 pixel image should be more than 120kB, and still look good and sharp.
It's a broadband thing. There's a tendency not to bother to be aware of dial-up delays anymore. An update to Parkinson's Law for the IT age could be, "Filesize expands to fill the bandwidth available for its download" (Bloater's Law?)
So although it's faster, it just as slow in the long run ;o)
**"Bloater's Law"...**I love it...will credit you when I steal it, heh heh heh....but you are quite right...I have a small computer and even with DSL it sometimes get's very cranky with huge images.
Once
in a while I look around,
I see
a sound
and
try to write it down
Sometimes
they come out very soft
Tinkling light sound
The Sun comes up again
Well this page was originally the page that had the "Todays most viewed, Todays most commented, etc on it and when there was so many thumbnails with lots of nudity, we hide those other sections and left just the Whats New. We are fixing this where you can click page two from that page and then keep going:)
Quote - Well this page was originally the page that had the "Todays most viewed, Todays most commented, etc on it and when there was so many thumbnails with lots of nudity, we hide those other sections and left just the Whats New. We are fixing this where you can click page two from that page and then keep going:)
Stacey,
Not sure what your meaning by "fix" but instead of wasting all that time to "fix" something, just delete the What's New page and let the Recent Uploads page be the opening page for the gallery.
Until BROADBAND is affordably available to everyone, noone should assume everyone has it.
As for NUDITY... those who think nudity is more dangerous than violence, death and gore should just be able to block all nude images from displaying in their browser with a simple button.
"An Example is worth Ten Thousand Words"
Quote - Until BROADBAND is affordably available to everyone, noone should assume everyone has it.
In many U.S. markets, dial-up is actually priced higher than DSL. Perhaps you meant to say "readily" available. According to Nielsen/NetRatings, nearly 75% of U.S. households now use some form of high-speed broadband, which is up from 57% just one year ago, likely due to introductory pricing. The remaining holdouts are those who are so remote as to not have broadband (and Satellite Internet install and the monthly fee is rather high) and people on AOL dial-up who have never even heard of broadband, but don't really require it because all they do is e-mail their kids twice a month. Not to say AOL users are idiots, I use them as the example as they do have the largest share of dial-up users. Of course, there are those on the low end of the tier where all they can afford is butchered 56k Internet at $9.95 a month. But honestly, I can't see these discount ISPs having much life left.
With 28% and dropping of users at only 56k, it is rather difficult to remember those at such speeds and this is why you see image sizes growing much larger. One tends to become spoiled rather quickly. A 512k image is nothing to a DSL, cable or FiOS user.
Regards,
Steve
Has it been addressed in this some of these pages how when I choose to look at the gallery images at their original large size - the words written by the artist under the picture jump to the left in a very narrow column.
I have always had my links column for renderosity in general on the right hand side of the screen. Does this have anything to do with how the words under the gallery images are appearing?
I am really pleased to find a way to view the pictures without having to click and resize and click to close. This is a great relief. Thank you very much! Now just to find a way to deal with how the words appear.
I do have my script set to show larger font sizes in the forum and gallery area because otherwise I cannot read it. That may be the other reason that the artist's words get scrunched up?
Oh and thank you also for having an option to turn off the silly balloon pop ups over the thumbnails. :-)
Life Requires Assembly and we all know how THAT goes!
Stacey, William, other Rosity folks,
A belated thanks for your elegant compromise on the resizing/thumbnail issue. I think your solution is quite good. Thanks for taking our concerns into account.
Best,
LinkDink
I know this is a bit late in the discussion but it seems to me that if someone comes to an art site, they should see the art the way the artist creating the art created it. Not resized or otherwise altered.
Just my two cents......................
P.S. I still hate just about everything with the new changeovers, so forgive me if I sound cynical, jaded, or miffed.
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" ~George Orwell
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
I am missing ebots for posts after:
PJF
Joined: 20 Feb 1999
Posts: 2676
Last Post: 21 Jun 06
[profile]
Posted Wed, Jun 21, 2006 2:55 am
through:
FlyByNight
Joined: 07 Jun 2000
Posts: 806
Last Post: 21 Jun 06
[profile]
Posted Wed, Jun 21, 2006 11:34 am
Any reason for this? Yes, I am subscribed. & Yes, this is an ongoing issue for me across a subscritions on all threads.
Thanks in advance for checking on this.
Viking Lady