Fri, Nov 8, 5:29 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Vue



Welcome to the Vue Forum

Forum Moderators: wheatpenny, TheBryster

Vue F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Oct 26 8:50 am)



Subject: Vue Realism Team (just and idea) Details inside


  • 1
  • 2
ibanezcollector ( ) posted Wed, 06 August 2003 at 10:30 PM · edited Fri, 08 November 2024 at 5:29 AM

Ok I want to get 3 or 4 people that are pretty fluent in Vue to try and assemble some sort of team to try different ideas to eventually make a tutorial on realism and proper lighting. Wow thats a long sentence. Any how I am really close and just tryed something with pretty decent results. But I dont have a high quality model. I dont have the extra cash to purchase a very high quality model so we will have to scavage the web to find one. When a model is found we will all use that model to expirement till realism is achieved. When it is then we will begin the tutorial part of how it was achieved... Whatcha think, Hope this makes sense? You can reach me on aol instant messenger by the name ibanezcollector or thru my email savage21@wideopenwest.com I think with the right people and some crazy ideas we can break thru vue's half decent lighting and achieve realism..


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Wed, 06 August 2003 at 11:19 PM

thats not what im saying at all.. Im saying find a free one somewhere.. I dont know every free model site on the web.. But we would need something very detailed. FREE is the key word.. Not have someone pay for it.. I never no where in that post implied or meant for it to sound like I was implying someone to buy a model.. Vue does not have the best lighting in the rendering world and all im saying is with a few creative people we might be able to come up with something.. Ever see a 3D Max HDRI render.. Thats lighting.. Vue of course isnt a $3600 dollar program but I think with some of the people here on the site we might be able to come up with something close on our own.. Then others can learn how to do it for themselves..


rds ( ) posted Wed, 06 August 2003 at 11:27 PM

I would have to stay stick to the program and spend as much time working with Vue as you are making up contests or what ever else. If you have a specific question or need help with a certain part of the program, by all means just ask. Photo realism can be achieved with not a whole lot of effort. Try new things, instead of the Vue can't do this or that. Perhaps try the approach in what ways can I do this with Vue. If you look at the galleries and find a photo realistic scene you like just ask the artist how he did it and more than like you will learn how. Vue is not a CRUSE LOL it is a blessing. BTW I think you should run any contest ideas by the moderator of this forum. That way you may get a more positive result and learn more. Just a thought. ~shoop PS you came pretty close with the cel phone I thought. Keep up the effort.


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Wed, 06 August 2003 at 11:43 PM

file_70444.jpg

see this is what im talking about this was rendered in 3D Studio Max.. How would you acheive this in vue? See I dont think its possible but with some creative minds we may be able to get close.. Buy making some sort of filters or doing something out of the ordinary.. We may some how be able to revolutionize(spelling) vue lighting instead of just saying its fine the way it is.. We as people need to evolve and so does software.. If vue wont do it for you then someone with the creativity and patience may be able to do it.. Im not trying to sound cocky, im not trying to be bullish as some one put it.. Im just trying to get a few people to work with me on a project to help other vue'ers. Didnt know this would cause a scene.. If so sorry i'll keep trying myself. Teamwork is just that a Team more than one..


rds ( ) posted Wed, 06 August 2003 at 11:54 PM

Well, honestly that can be done in Vue. Yes, I would just keep trying. Good luck.


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 12:04 AM

RDS how would you go about getting the details in the car like the trees etc etc on the roof and the wing in vue with out adding super reflections to the material. How would you achieve such a high amount of reflections with out over doing the material to the point its almost a mirror? How would you set it so its illumination isnt a spot light or point light(i.e. Global Illumination). See thats what I want to know and everyone says it can be done but no one can tell you how. This is what I want to change.


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 12:06 AM

let me rephrase the above.. How would one get those reflections with out making the whole car totally reflective.


rds ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 12:41 AM

Adjusting the reflective materials editor Click variable Reflectivity then play with the function editor. Next try a number of the different light gels that Vue offers. If that does not work delete the sun all together and start playing with lighting. Add different lights and experiment with results in small renders. In the Gel editor there are number of things you can do. See how that works and let me know. I think the main thing is to get in front of the program more and experiment. Hope this may be helpful and good luck. `shoop


gebe ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 3:19 AM

ibanezcollector, you can do a contest for it here at Renderosity. Just get some prices to offer, write an IM to Spike who can create you a contest page and then run the contest. :-)Guitta


SAMS3D ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 4:39 AM

file_70445.jpg

Oh I don't know, David did this one, looks really good and I did this the Mill, not bad as far as realism goes. Sharen


SAMS3D ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 4:40 AM

file_70446.jpg

.


SAMS3D ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 4:40 AM

All done in Vue, no postwork


rollmops ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 6:19 AM

Well,i think what ibanezcollector is missing is the capability of radiosity in Vue.But in fact it can be faked, like i`m faking it in Cinema 8.1 most of the time to avoid long rendertimes.Reflections can be set over 100% in vue,even highlights.The key to get more control over the materials of your scene is to seperate parts of an object. Therefore you need high detail models .I think the idea of making a sort of competition is quiete interresting:)

http://www.fredivoss.de 

...yippi ah yeah or something like that...


thomaskrahn ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 9:26 AM

Hmm.. I don't know.. Doesn't this looks photorealistic. I could be cheated if I was told it was a photo, I'm sure :) Well.. I've just created a new tutorial with "photorealism" as the theme. You might wanna take a look at it. It's in the tutorial-section. And I find the challenge thing exciting too! :) I'd love to sponsor a 3rd prize or something with my package "Small Trees 01" :)


thomaskrahn ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 9:29 AM

file_70447.jpg

woops! Forgot to attache the image :)


agiel ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 9:33 AM

Did you try playing with arrays of soft quadratic point lights ? I am on a business trip right now, so I can't give you an example in Vue but I will try to make one when I get back on friday.


rollmops ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 10:05 AM

file_70448.jpg

Well, let me show some examples first my latest vue image. only 3 lights (1 sunlight included).

http://www.fredivoss.de 

...yippi ah yeah or something like that...


rollmops ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 10:09 AM

file_70449.jpg

This one is not done in vue,it is a cinema image.But i used 3 lights here ,too.Very simple constellation.GI is not necessary all the time.

http://www.fredivoss.de 

...yippi ah yeah or something like that...


YL ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 10:31 AM

Awesome pics ! ;=) Yves


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 10:49 AM

file_70450.jpg

ok maybe I have a different opinion on what looks real.. All of the above look awesome but you can clearly tell there computer animated. My idea of realism is you can not tell it was done on a computer. Lets look at the suitcase for a moment. Its a beautiful scene and looks fairly real but it still looks fake. I love the textures and the lighting is good but it lacks realism. Here is some shots of the type of realsim Im talking about..


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 10:52 AM

file_70451.jpg

another


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 10:52 AM

file_70452.jpg

another


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 10:53 AM

file_70453.jpg

more


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 10:57 AM

See those look real.. Not kinda real cause you used some high quality textures. No disrespect meant to anyone. See thats photo realism in my eyes. Its all about the lighting. In real life lighting doesnt reflect or distribute like vue does. Thats its flaw. I again am not complaining cause I dont have the money to buy a 3700 dollar program. All I was saying is lets get a few of renderositys top vue image makers and set forth a mission to somehow create a way in vue to give others a tool to work with. I never wanted a contest, or thought of offering it.. I dont know where this keeps coming from. I just wanted to assemble a team of hard working, dedicated, vue creators to try and solve one of vues downfalls.


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 11:00 AM

file_70454.jpg

last one


rollmops ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 11:27 AM

I see,this is almost a kind of philosophical discussion now.Very interresting.You brought nice examples,althought the beetle does not look real at all to me.I think, the question is ,which kind of photorealism should be achived: the reality of a 18 by 24 inch Kamera or the reality of a 24 by 36 mm Kamera.Or should it be the reality of a human eye?All images shown here are more or less an interpretation of "photorealism",filtered through the eye of the artist. I think it is a good idea to push Vue to it's limits,like you're planning. Btw:my suitcase is not a finished scene.I took it as a detail from a complex scene as an example for modelling. Another thing:you don't have to spend 3700 bucks to get a high end programm,take a look at Cinema it's much cheaper if you get the XL-bundle (including HDRI and GI ):) But ok,we're in the Vue forum here...:) cheers rollmops.

http://www.fredivoss.de 

...yippi ah yeah or something like that...


tesign ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 11:37 AM

Thanks for sharing those presentation. How I wish Vue can do this straight from the box without too much messing. Again, great idea you have here!


Rokol ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 11:40 AM

file_70455.jpg

I have played around with faking radiosity and got something close. Used a luminous white block behind the model. It has the reflections showing up clearly to my mind!! There are a few others I posted last month in my gallery. Can give you some more details if you think it edges towards what you are yearning for. regards Rokol.


pmermino ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 12:01 PM

file_70456.jpg

Hmm ... what an interesting thread , what is photorealism.... is it what we see, or what we want to see.. So ibanezcollector , is the last pictures you have posted realistic pictures ??? No even if they look real... I take your pictures : 1. the airplane This is a very good meshe but most of the textures are photographic. The background is a photo, OK it seems to be real. But what's the difference with a full photo ?? 2. The beetle car. I heve never seen a car in such a situation. It stand in a plain gray 'room' and we can see reflection of buildings on it ??? 3. The guitar I have a friend who plays guitar. He owns a real stratocaster. It is much more dirty than the picture you have posted ... where is reality ?? 4. The candels How many candels have you seen in your life, ok it is like in a photographer studio.... This is not real.... even if it is photorealistic. ... it is a composition 5. The 'balls' Even in the most skilled photographer's dreams, such a picture would be really impossible... what fkond of perfect windows to create such reflections ??? Ok .... may be you misunderstand somethings.... what kind of picture do you want to create ??? and what kind of tool do you choose ... One thing more... in the pictures you have posted : no plants, no buildings, no characters .... and ... what kind of postworks where used .... ? If what you want to render is a sports car in a plain grey ground... try Lightwave or 3DSMax.... it is possible with Vue, but I agree with you, Vue is not the most suitable tool ... And yes it would be a great challenge to render a car on a plain gray ground with Vue ... Cheers Patrick


pmermino ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 12:08 PM

Oh .... I have posted a quick render of a car on a plain gray ground.... rendered with Vue.... the mesh is from the VUE4 CD. This is a low poly mesh... with plain textures and with few modifs.... I'm sure it is possible to do much more better.... they are some mistakes in the textures (the rear tyre, and so else)... I don't think that Vue is a 'half lighted' soft .... cheers.... Patrick


rds ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 1:21 PM

file_70457.jpg

What is realism? The dictionary definition is: Representing or viewing things as they are in reality. Being a human is reality. However, even though we are 99.999% the same genetically as humans we all are unique in our ideas and thinking. What one person see as reality another does not. What is true for a child no longer holds true when it becomes an adult. If this is a discussion of philosophy it could take forever and many books to come to any conclusions as a team. In general I would not go to the 3ds forum and convey the idea that 3ds is has realism defects in my eyes. Why would I do that? Everyone at that forum would wonder I am sure, what my view of reality really is. I have learned that many do not see things in the same perceptions as I. Some people have selective seeing only seeing fault or praise based on certain bias. Others may only hear what they want to hear based on personal desire. On and on it goes and has since the beginning I think. Vue is a fantastic program and what the degree of realism you as an artist can bend the program to attain is your personal victory over the math involved. Cost is not the issue IMHO, perception is. Now I perceive the attached image of 3 spheres very real. Others however, may not. Some may view me as a real pain in the neck others may not. The fans of Marilyn Monroe may think she should have used her real name Norma Jean to maintain more realism others really dont care and only where interested in there perceptions of her beauty. Why not a contest? That can be a very good way to test your theory and learn more as well. Once again good luck in your search for reality. `shoop


Kutter ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 1:24 PM

Yeah, I like this thread too... Ibanez, you have used some spectacular examples to show what you mean. I however am of the impression that no mater how good you are with Vue, the sort of look your attempting is not possible! Now let me put into perspective whats 'not possible' about it, before everyone starts disagreeing with me... Radiosity is a BIG issue with the sort of pic you want to make. Vue isn't capable, and therfore will NOT yeild the same result. Can it be faked? I dunno, I'm pretty impressed with Rokol's attempt at it, and sure i feel that Vue is capable of phenominal work, but that aside can this be done? I'm glad you bought this up, and I for one am willing to help, and challenge myself with it also. We may not get to where we want, but I think we will have fun trying. Count me in. Email: kutteruk@yahoo.co.uk Kutter. Oh by the way... The model can be anything! it doesn't have to be complicated... look at the balls and candles pics! I think we should throw some examples of models in here to see what we can find. Then all pick the same model and see what we can do with it :) One other thing... I'm real busy at the moment and can't throw a lot of time at it, but I come to the forum everyday, so keep me up to date...


Kutter ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 1:30 PM

Oooh Shoop :) You posted as I was typing... Great pic bud, the Red ball looks better than the other two, but its an excellent attempt. I agree with you about perception, and I think that something like this can and will bring people together. Ideas will clash, but ultimately I think we can all learn a lot. Lets not have a 'contest' so to speak, lets just have a common place where we can come, show and tell what we've been up to ... I want to learn, and Renderosity is the best place on the net. Lets pool our resources and get this thing going :) Just need a common model so we can all be working from the same spot :) Kutter


rds ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 1:41 PM

Sure sounds like you and Ibanez are on the same page. Give it a try and I disagree with the (no mater how good you are with Vue, the sort of look your attempting is not possible!)All things are possible, and if you throw enough time and effort towards anything desired results can be attained. Good luck.


nish ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 1:50 PM

Yves (YL) inspired me to learn more about lights, (as I'm learning now) so, I know I don't have proper authority to speak in this matter But I think Patrick is right. If you want to create HDRI, my personal opinon would be Vue is not the proper tool. But realism/photorealism, well that's up to the viewers. One person might be happy with the picture from a $50 camera, then may be the next person won't be happy with the same shot with a top notch SLR camera. So, it is up to you, how you want to create your realism. And quiet frankly how can you make up a team, when every team member will have a different definition of photorealism? Look at all the pictures posted, everyone (including you) clamed the pictures are photo realistic. Yet they are very different from each other. But, as I was typing Kutter joined your leage. :-) Good luck to you two. You wrote, "Ever see a 3Ds Max HDRI render.. Thats lighting.. " ... well, that's the first and formost thing ofcourse, but "that's" not all. It requires HIGH detailed meshes, shadows & highlights, then ofcourse gradient plays a role; post work requires tonemapping or may be gamma correction or may be something else! And after all this the end result would make someone applaud and someone turn their face otherway! :-) ... My humble opinion.


forester ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 2:32 PM

Count me in too! I'll help. Anything we do re lighting will be useful, and will probably help others. Lighting is the most critical element and the first rule is to never take it for granted. Re: Kutter's comments about a common place to work, ... I think I can make part of my web site available to all via Anon FTP. Will take me a day to work out how, but was wanting to figure this out anyhow. I have lots of space and my web site is sitting right on top on the eastern Level 1 Line for the US, so it can handle any bandwidth anyone might have. Will post a URL here tomorrow if I can get this up and running correctly tonite. If anyone needs FTP software let me know.



pmermino ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 3:49 PM

file_70458.jpg

About realism : 1


pmermino ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 3:50 PM

file_70459.jpg

About realism 2 :


pmermino ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 3:55 PM

Attached Link: http://www.gillesesnault.com

file_70460.jpg

About realism 3 : Yes all this pictures are oil paintings ...by my friend Gilles Esnault.... no software at all .... this could be a good example of what we are looking for ... No ???


thomaskrahn ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 4:04 PM

Hmm Patrick. THIS is photorealism. BUT : About the post you made before these ones : I totally disagree with you! "3. The guitar : I have a friend who plays guitar. He owns a real stratocaster. It is much more dirty than the picture you have posted ... where is reality ??" This image IS photorealistic :) You can't say that because it's not dirty is isn't realistic. I play guitar, I've seen plenty of stratocasters and the new ones, definately aren't dirty. They look JUST like the one ibaneze posted :) "4. The candels : How many candels have you seen in your life, ok it is like in a photographer studio.... This is not real.... even if it is photorealistic. ... it is a composition" So what your saying is that an image from uhmm.. the medieval-age for example, can't be photorealistic since it's impossible to travel back in time? :) - Thomas


YL ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 4:30 PM

My opinion is that it is not possible to obtain in Vue the realism of the pictures shown by ibanezcollector, done with C4D for instance. By realism we can say a picture looking like a photo, as some which were presented above. The reason is there is no GI and radiosity and hdri in Vue. Of course we can fake them, but in that case huge rendering times are necessary since we need high quality renders (I mean rendering times > 100h for a single sphere !). One important thing is also to model the environment surrounding the objects of a scene : the environment will reflect in the objects and add to realism as we can see on ibanezcollector pic of 3 balls; this pic could be done in Vue but it should be necessary to model all environment or to add a semi-sphere with a mapped picture on it : again huge rendering time with Vue which is limiting the possibilities ! An other point, the quality of models, tends to increase rendering times. Could be interesting to have a contest on that topic :=p One of the first time I see a thread concerning realism in Vue most of the time people only want to do landscapes with Vue ;=) Yves


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 4:37 PM

I think I may have found a way to sorta fake the hdri in the picture with the 3 spheres im going to render it on final real quick(lol) and then post it for opinions.. I really had to try some sill stuff but I may have it.. Be back in a few after the renders done..


erka ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 4:51 PM

Wow, this thread is getting more and more interesting :) Ibanez, i think you are working with the wrong program. Vue d'esprit, as was said here before me, cannot do this type of renders. You'll need a good global lighting solution, and a razor-sharp renderer. C4D, Lightwave, Softimage, Max. Well, the big guys. Vue was intended to be a simple, easy to use (and cheap!!) landscape program. You can do wonderful art with it, and this community is the proof, but those sparkly swooshy sleeky car renders were never its strong point. As Patrick said here, photorealism is pretty much in the eye of the beholder. One looks for the perfect reflective car paint gloss, while the other looks for dirt, grit and imperfection. Personaly i stopped saying wow over those perfect renders as they have become almost mundane in the world of 3D. I get much more excited seeing an image which conveys a feeling, a mood, an atmosphere, a story. However, this type of photorealism is very much appreciated in the professional 3D world, where it's realy needed for industrial design and visualisation. But then again, you'll have to work with a "high end" program.


pmermino ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 4:55 PM

Thomas, What I would to say is that this may be 'photo' but not 'realistic' ... may be this is mmh ... 'photoidealistic'...? I can see the skill of the guy... but something is missing... not necessary dirt :) Have a look at the shadows in the 'guitar' picture... The volume button shadow, the tone button shadow ... and the micro shadow.... they are all false. What I can say about this picture is : brilliant ... but false shadows ... sorry ... :-) But this could be a great challenge to try a real 'photorealistic' picture with Vue


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 5:28 PM

file_70461.jpg

Ok heres what I did.. I set up the picture then I deleted the ground and made a cube extremly thin and some what transparent. Since I couldnt get vue to shade half the so called ground I put 2 black boxes underneath the ground so it changed the color of the ground. Which produced the shade. I then added 3 lights and a alpha plane.. I then made the alpha plane somewhat transparent and made it so it reflects colored light. So basically when the light, which is really turned up hits the alpha plane it will project the image on to the spheres.. I then created two seperate pictures one with the alpha plane and one with out.. I then headed to photoshop to blend the two images.. Heres a screen shot of vue to show the lay out and the picture will follow in the next post.. I think if I mess with the materials and light more I may just found what I wanted..


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 5:37 PM

file_70462.jpg

ok scratch the whole photoshop idea.. Didnt work as I planned here the untouched picture with the light bursting thru the alpha plane..


ibanezcollector ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 5:42 PM

now if I lightly texture the ground, and mess with the materials to give it more of a pool ball feel versus the metallic feel it has now. I might be on to something.. The lighting which isnt my strong point needs reworked as well. But its a start..


rds ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 5:48 PM

Well with this thread of attention getting so long I will just finish with you came in saying it couldn't be done and in just a few hours now you claim it just maybe possible. Good job on that. Have fun with the program. BTW I play Guitar too and that is NOT how a Strat's screws look either. It was once said to duplicate the real world in reality is what a good digital camera was made for. This is art we are doing here I think? LOL.. :)


raven ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 6:47 PM
Online Now!

On the subject of the strat, the saddles would have to be taken apart to restring it. The cylinder part of the string is under the bridge. Is on mine, anyway.



rollmops ( ) posted Thu, 07 August 2003 at 11:19 PM

Wow,this is going to be one of the longest threats of the last time :)

http://www.fredivoss.de 

...yippi ah yeah or something like that...


tradivoro ( ) posted Fri, 08 August 2003 at 3:04 PM

Hi Patrick, your friend Gilles Esnault is absolutely brilliant... Great technique...


  • 1
  • 2

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.