Forum Moderators: wheatpenny, TheBryster
Vue F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Oct 26 8:50 am)
thats not what im saying at all.. Im saying find a free one somewhere.. I dont know every free model site on the web.. But we would need something very detailed. FREE is the key word.. Not have someone pay for it.. I never no where in that post implied or meant for it to sound like I was implying someone to buy a model.. Vue does not have the best lighting in the rendering world and all im saying is with a few creative people we might be able to come up with something.. Ever see a 3D Max HDRI render.. Thats lighting.. Vue of course isnt a $3600 dollar program but I think with some of the people here on the site we might be able to come up with something close on our own.. Then others can learn how to do it for themselves..
I would have to stay stick to the program and spend as much time working with Vue as you are making up contests or what ever else. If you have a specific question or need help with a certain part of the program, by all means just ask. Photo realism can be achieved with not a whole lot of effort. Try new things, instead of the Vue can't do this or that. Perhaps try the approach in what ways can I do this with Vue. If you look at the galleries and find a photo realistic scene you like just ask the artist how he did it and more than like you will learn how. Vue is not a CRUSE LOL it is a blessing. BTW I think you should run any contest ideas by the moderator of this forum. That way you may get a more positive result and learn more. Just a thought. ~shoop PS you came pretty close with the cel phone I thought. Keep up the effort.
RDS how would you go about getting the details in the car like the trees etc etc on the roof and the wing in vue with out adding super reflections to the material. How would you achieve such a high amount of reflections with out over doing the material to the point its almost a mirror? How would you set it so its illumination isnt a spot light or point light(i.e. Global Illumination). See thats what I want to know and everyone says it can be done but no one can tell you how. This is what I want to change.
Adjusting the reflective materials editor Click variable Reflectivity then play with the function editor. Next try a number of the different light gels that Vue offers. If that does not work delete the sun all together and start playing with lighting. Add different lights and experiment with results in small renders. In the Gel editor there are number of things you can do. See how that works and let me know. I think the main thing is to get in front of the program more and experiment. Hope this may be helpful and good luck. `shoop
Well,i think what ibanezcollector is missing is the capability of radiosity in Vue.But in fact it can be faked, like i`m faking it in Cinema 8.1 most of the time to avoid long rendertimes.Reflections can be set over 100% in vue,even highlights.The key to get more control over the materials of your scene is to seperate parts of an object. Therefore you need high detail models .I think the idea of making a sort of competition is quiete interresting:)
http://www.fredivoss.de
...yippi ah yeah or something like that...
Hmm.. I don't know.. Doesn't this looks photorealistic. I could be cheated if I was told it was a photo, I'm sure :) Well.. I've just created a new tutorial with "photorealism" as the theme. You might wanna take a look at it. It's in the tutorial-section. And I find the challenge thing exciting too! :) I'd love to sponsor a 3rd prize or something with my package "Small Trees 01" :)
Did you try playing with arrays of soft quadratic point lights ? I am on a business trip right now, so I can't give you an example in Vue but I will try to make one when I get back on friday.
http://www.fredivoss.de
...yippi ah yeah or something like that...
http://www.fredivoss.de
...yippi ah yeah or something like that...
See those look real.. Not kinda real cause you used some high quality textures. No disrespect meant to anyone. See thats photo realism in my eyes. Its all about the lighting. In real life lighting doesnt reflect or distribute like vue does. Thats its flaw. I again am not complaining cause I dont have the money to buy a 3700 dollar program. All I was saying is lets get a few of renderositys top vue image makers and set forth a mission to somehow create a way in vue to give others a tool to work with. I never wanted a contest, or thought of offering it.. I dont know where this keeps coming from. I just wanted to assemble a team of hard working, dedicated, vue creators to try and solve one of vues downfalls.
I see,this is almost a kind of philosophical discussion now.Very interresting.You brought nice examples,althought the beetle does not look real at all to me.I think, the question is ,which kind of photorealism should be achived: the reality of a 18 by 24 inch Kamera or the reality of a 24 by 36 mm Kamera.Or should it be the reality of a human eye?All images shown here are more or less an interpretation of "photorealism",filtered through the eye of the artist. I think it is a good idea to push Vue to it's limits,like you're planning. Btw:my suitcase is not a finished scene.I took it as a detail from a complex scene as an example for modelling. Another thing:you don't have to spend 3700 bucks to get a high end programm,take a look at Cinema it's much cheaper if you get the XL-bundle (including HDRI and GI ):) But ok,we're in the Vue forum here...:) cheers rollmops.
http://www.fredivoss.de
...yippi ah yeah or something like that...
Oh .... I have posted a quick render of a car on a plain gray ground.... rendered with Vue.... the mesh is from the VUE4 CD. This is a low poly mesh... with plain textures and with few modifs.... I'm sure it is possible to do much more better.... they are some mistakes in the textures (the rear tyre, and so else)... I don't think that Vue is a 'half lighted' soft .... cheers.... Patrick
Yeah, I like this thread too... Ibanez, you have used some spectacular examples to show what you mean. I however am of the impression that no mater how good you are with Vue, the sort of look your attempting is not possible! Now let me put into perspective whats 'not possible' about it, before everyone starts disagreeing with me... Radiosity is a BIG issue with the sort of pic you want to make. Vue isn't capable, and therfore will NOT yeild the same result. Can it be faked? I dunno, I'm pretty impressed with Rokol's attempt at it, and sure i feel that Vue is capable of phenominal work, but that aside can this be done? I'm glad you bought this up, and I for one am willing to help, and challenge myself with it also. We may not get to where we want, but I think we will have fun trying. Count me in. Email: kutteruk@yahoo.co.uk Kutter. Oh by the way... The model can be anything! it doesn't have to be complicated... look at the balls and candles pics! I think we should throw some examples of models in here to see what we can find. Then all pick the same model and see what we can do with it :) One other thing... I'm real busy at the moment and can't throw a lot of time at it, but I come to the forum everyday, so keep me up to date...
Oooh Shoop :) You posted as I was typing... Great pic bud, the Red ball looks better than the other two, but its an excellent attempt. I agree with you about perception, and I think that something like this can and will bring people together. Ideas will clash, but ultimately I think we can all learn a lot. Lets not have a 'contest' so to speak, lets just have a common place where we can come, show and tell what we've been up to ... I want to learn, and Renderosity is the best place on the net. Lets pool our resources and get this thing going :) Just need a common model so we can all be working from the same spot :) Kutter
Sure sounds like you and Ibanez are on the same page. Give it a try and I disagree with the (no mater how good you are with Vue, the sort of look your attempting is not possible!)All things are possible, and if you throw enough time and effort towards anything desired results can be attained. Good luck.
Yves (YL) inspired me to learn more about lights, (as I'm learning now) so, I know I don't have proper authority to speak in this matter But I think Patrick is right. If you want to create HDRI, my personal opinon would be Vue is not the proper tool. But realism/photorealism, well that's up to the viewers. One person might be happy with the picture from a $50 camera, then may be the next person won't be happy with the same shot with a top notch SLR camera. So, it is up to you, how you want to create your realism. And quiet frankly how can you make up a team, when every team member will have a different definition of photorealism? Look at all the pictures posted, everyone (including you) clamed the pictures are photo realistic. Yet they are very different from each other. But, as I was typing Kutter joined your leage. :-) Good luck to you two. You wrote, "Ever see a 3Ds Max HDRI render.. Thats lighting.. " ... well, that's the first and formost thing ofcourse, but "that's" not all. It requires HIGH detailed meshes, shadows & highlights, then ofcourse gradient plays a role; post work requires tonemapping or may be gamma correction or may be something else! And after all this the end result would make someone applaud and someone turn their face otherway! :-) ... My humble opinion.
Count me in too! I'll help. Anything we do re lighting will be useful, and will probably help others. Lighting is the most critical element and the first rule is to never take it for granted. Re: Kutter's comments about a common place to work, ... I think I can make part of my web site available to all via Anon FTP. Will take me a day to work out how, but was wanting to figure this out anyhow. I have lots of space and my web site is sitting right on top on the eastern Level 1 Line for the US, so it can handle any bandwidth anyone might have. Will post a URL here tomorrow if I can get this up and running correctly tonite. If anyone needs FTP software let me know.
Attached Link: http://www.gillesesnault.com
About realism 3 : Yes all this pictures are oil paintings ...by my friend Gilles Esnault.... no software at all .... this could be a good example of what we are looking for ... No ???Hmm Patrick. THIS is photorealism. BUT : About the post you made before these ones : I totally disagree with you! "3. The guitar : I have a friend who plays guitar. He owns a real stratocaster. It is much more dirty than the picture you have posted ... where is reality ??" This image IS photorealistic :) You can't say that because it's not dirty is isn't realistic. I play guitar, I've seen plenty of stratocasters and the new ones, definately aren't dirty. They look JUST like the one ibaneze posted :) "4. The candels : How many candels have you seen in your life, ok it is like in a photographer studio.... This is not real.... even if it is photorealistic. ... it is a composition" So what your saying is that an image from uhmm.. the medieval-age for example, can't be photorealistic since it's impossible to travel back in time? :) - Thomas
My opinion is that it is not possible to obtain in Vue the realism of the pictures shown by ibanezcollector, done with C4D for instance. By realism we can say a picture looking like a photo, as some which were presented above. The reason is there is no GI and radiosity and hdri in Vue. Of course we can fake them, but in that case huge rendering times are necessary since we need high quality renders (I mean rendering times > 100h for a single sphere !). One important thing is also to model the environment surrounding the objects of a scene : the environment will reflect in the objects and add to realism as we can see on ibanezcollector pic of 3 balls; this pic could be done in Vue but it should be necessary to model all environment or to add a semi-sphere with a mapped picture on it : again huge rendering time with Vue which is limiting the possibilities ! An other point, the quality of models, tends to increase rendering times. Could be interesting to have a contest on that topic :=p One of the first time I see a thread concerning realism in Vue most of the time people only want to do landscapes with Vue ;=) Yves
Wow, this thread is getting more and more interesting :) Ibanez, i think you are working with the wrong program. Vue d'esprit, as was said here before me, cannot do this type of renders. You'll need a good global lighting solution, and a razor-sharp renderer. C4D, Lightwave, Softimage, Max. Well, the big guys. Vue was intended to be a simple, easy to use (and cheap!!) landscape program. You can do wonderful art with it, and this community is the proof, but those sparkly swooshy sleeky car renders were never its strong point. As Patrick said here, photorealism is pretty much in the eye of the beholder. One looks for the perfect reflective car paint gloss, while the other looks for dirt, grit and imperfection. Personaly i stopped saying wow over those perfect renders as they have become almost mundane in the world of 3D. I get much more excited seeing an image which conveys a feeling, a mood, an atmosphere, a story. However, this type of photorealism is very much appreciated in the professional 3D world, where it's realy needed for industrial design and visualisation. But then again, you'll have to work with a "high end" program.
Thomas, What I would to say is that this may be 'photo' but not 'realistic' ... may be this is mmh ... 'photoidealistic'...? I can see the skill of the guy... but something is missing... not necessary dirt :) Have a look at the shadows in the 'guitar' picture... The volume button shadow, the tone button shadow ... and the micro shadow.... they are all false. What I can say about this picture is : brilliant ... but false shadows ... sorry ... :-) But this could be a great challenge to try a real 'photorealistic' picture with Vue
Well with this thread of attention getting so long I will just finish with you came in saying it couldn't be done and in just a few hours now you claim it just maybe possible. Good job on that. Have fun with the program. BTW I play Guitar too and that is NOT how a Strat's screws look either. It was once said to duplicate the real world in reality is what a good digital camera was made for. This is art we are doing here I think? LOL.. :)
Wow,this is going to be one of the longest threats of the last time :)
http://www.fredivoss.de
...yippi ah yeah or something like that...
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Ok I want to get 3 or 4 people that are pretty fluent in Vue to try and assemble some sort of team to try different ideas to eventually make a tutorial on realism and proper lighting. Wow thats a long sentence. Any how I am really close and just tryed something with pretty decent results. But I dont have a high quality model. I dont have the extra cash to purchase a very high quality model so we will have to scavage the web to find one. When a model is found we will all use that model to expirement till realism is achieved. When it is then we will begin the tutorial part of how it was achieved... Whatcha think, Hope this makes sense? You can reach me on aol instant messenger by the name ibanezcollector or thru my email savage21@wideopenwest.com I think with the right people and some crazy ideas we can break thru vue's half decent lighting and achieve realism..